Abstract
We describe rules for building 2d theories labeled by 4-manifolds. Using the proposed dictionary between building blocks of 4-manifolds and 2d \(\mathcal{N} = (0,2)\) theories, we obtain a number of results, which include new 3d \(\mathcal{N} = 2\) theories T[M 3] associated with rational homology spheres and new results for Vafa–Witten partition functions on 4-manifolds. In particular, we point out that the gluing measure for the latter is precisely the superconformal index of 2d (0, 2) vector multiplet and relate the basic building blocks with coset branching functions. We also offer a new look at the fusion of defect lines/walls, and a physical interpretation of the 4d and 3d Kirby calculus as dualities of 2d \(\mathcal{N} = (0,2)\) theories and 3d \(\mathcal{N} = 2\) theories, respectively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
That is, detQ = ±1.
- 2.
Note, this cannot be deduced from the Rokhlin’s theorem as in the case of the E 8 manifold.
- 3.
Sometimes, to avoid clutter, we suppress the choice of the gauge group, G, which in most of our applications will be either G = U(N) or G = SU(N) for some N ≥ 1. It would be interesting to see if generalization to G of Cartan type D or E leads to new phenomena. We will not aim to do this analysis here.
- 4.
Recall, that a free Fermi multiplet contributes to the central charge (c L , c R ) = (1, 0).
- 5.
Another nice property of such 4-manifolds is that they admit an achiral Lefschetz fibration over the disk [Har79].
- 6.
But not all! See Fig. 3 for an instructive (counter)example.
- 7.
Depending on the context, sometimes M 3 will refer to a single component of the boundary.
- 8.
While this problem has been successfully solved for a large class of 3-manifolds [DGG1, CCV, DGG2], unfortunately it will not be enough for our purposes here and we need to resort to matching M 3 with T[M 3] based on identification of vacua, as was originally proposed in [DGH11]. One reason is that the methods of loc. cit. work best for 3-manifolds with sufficiently large boundary and/or fundamental group, whereas in our present context M 3 is itself a boundary and, in many cases, is a rational homology sphere. As we shall see below, 3d \(\mathcal{N} = 2\) theories T[M 3] seem to be qualitatively different in these two cases; typically, they are (deformations of) superconformal theories in the former case and massive 3d \(\mathcal{N} = 2\) theories in the latter. Another, more serious issue is that 3d theories T[M 3] constructed in [DGG1] do not account for all flat connections on M 3, which will be crucial in our applications below. This second issue can be avoided by considering larger 3d theories T (ref)[M 3] that have to do with refinement/categorification and mix all branches of flat connections [FGSA, FGP13]. Pursuing this approach should lead to new relations with rich algebraic structure and functoriality of knot homologies.
- 9.
The converse is not true since some line defects in 2d come from line operators in 3d.
- 10.
Explaining how to do this is precisely the goal of the present section.
- 11.
Note, in [VW94] the symmetry group U(1) U is enhanced to the global symmetry group SU(2) U due to larger R-symmetry of the starting point.
- 12.
When M 4 is non-compact χ(M 4) should be replaced by the regularized Euler characteristic, and when G = U(N) one needs to remove by hand the zero-mode to ensure that the partition function does not vanish identically.
- 13.
Here and in what follows the instanton number is not necessarily an integer.
- 14.
Let us note that H 2(M 4 +) ≠ H 2(B) ⊕ H 2(M 4 −). However, the lattice H 2(M 4 +) can be obtained from the lattice H 2(B) ⊕ H 2(M 4 −) by the so-called gluing procedure that will be described in detail shortly.
- 15.
Such lift exists because the manifold is Spinc.
References
D.M. Austin, SO(3)-instantons on L(p, q) ×R. J. Differ. Geom. 32 (2), 383–413 (1990)
T. Asselmeyer, Generation of source terms in general relativity by differential structures. Classical Quantum Gravity 14, 749–758 (1997). [ gr-qc/9610009 ]
S. Akbulut, 4-Manifolds. Oxford Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 25 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016)
A. Adams, D. Guarrera, Heterotic flux Vacua from hybrid linear models (2009) [ arXiv:0902.4440 ]
B.S. Acharya, S. Gukov, M theory and singularities of exceptional holonomy manifolds. Phys. Rep. 392, 121–189 (2004). [ hep-th/0409191 ]
B.S. Acharya, C. Vafa, On domain walls of N=1 supersymmetric Yang-Mills in four-dimensions (2001). [ hep-th/0103011 ]
M.F. Atiyah, R.S. Ward, Instantons and algebraic geometry. Commun. Math. Phys. 55 (2), 117–124 (1977)
L.F. Alday, F. Benini, Y. Tachikawa, Liouville/Toda central charges from M5-branes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 141601 (2010). [ arXiv:0909.4776 ]
L.F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, Y. Tachikawa, Liouville correlation functions from four-dimensional Gauge theories. Lett. Math. Phys. 91, 167–197 (2010). [ arXiv:0906.3219 ]
M.F. Atiyah, V. Patodi, I. Singer, Spectral asymmetry and Riemannian geometry. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc 5 (2), 229–234 (1973)
M. Aganagic, H. Ooguri, N. Saulina, C. Vafa, Black holes, q-deformed 2d Yang-Mills, and non-perturbative topological strings. Nucl. Phys. B715, 304–348 (2005). [ hep-th/0411280 ]
F. Benini, N. Bobev, Two-dimensional SCFTs from wrapped Branes and c-extremization. J. High Energy Phys. 1306, 005 (2013). [ arXiv:1302.4451 ]
C. Bachas, S. Monnier, Defect loops in gauged Wess-Zumino-Witten models. J. High Energy Phys. 1002, 003 (2010). [ arXiv:0911.1562 ]
I. Brunner, D. Roggenkamp, B-type defects in Landau-Ginzburg models. J. High Energy Phys. 0708, 093 (2007). [ arXiv:0707.0922 ]
M. Blau, G. Thompson, Aspects of N(T) ≥ 2 topological gauge theories and D-branes. Nucl. Phys. B492, 545–590 (1997). [ hep-th/9612143 ]
M. Blau, G. Thompson, Euclidean SYM theories by time reduction and special holonomy manifolds. Phys. Lett. B415, 242–252 (1997). [ hep-th/9706225 ]
C. Beem, T. Dimofte, S. Pasquetti, Holomorphic blocks in three dimensions. J. High Energy Phys. 2014 (12), Article 177, 118 pp. (2014)
I. Brunner, H. Jockers, D. Roggenkamp, Defects and D-Brane monodromies. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 13, 1077–1135 (2009). [ arXiv:0806.4734 ]
M. Bershadsky, C. Vafa, V. Sadov, D-branes and topological field theories. Nucl. Phys. B463, 420–434 (1996). [ hep-th/9511222 ]
C. Bachas, J. de Boer, R. Dijkgraaf, H. Ooguri, Permeable conformal walls and holography. J. High Energy Phys. 0206, 027 (2002). [ hep-th/0111210 ]
F. Benini, R. Eager, K. Hori, Y. Tachikawa, Elliptic genera of two-dimensional N = 2 gauge theories with rank-one gauge groups. Lett. Math. Phys. 104 (4), 465–493 (2014)
O. Bergman, A. Hanany, A. Karch, B. Kol, Branes and supersymmetry breaking in three-dimensional gauge theories. J. High Energy Phys. 9910, 036 (1999). [ hep-th/9908075 ]
P. Berglund, C.V. Johnson, S. Kachru, P. Zaugg, Heterotic coset models and (0,2) string vacua. Nucl. Phys. B460, 252–298 (1996). [ hep-th/9509170 ]
C.G. Callan, J.A. Harvey, Anomalies and fermion zero modes on strings and domain walls. Nucl. Phys. B250, 427 (1985)
N. Carqueville, I. Runkel, Rigidity and defect actions in Landau-Ginzburg models. Commun. Math. Phys. 310, 135–179 (2012). [ arXiv:1006.5609 ]
S. Cecotti, C. Cordova, C. Vafa, Braids, walls, and mirrors (2011). [ arXiv:1110.2115 ]
S.K. Donaldson, An application of gauge theory to four-dimensional topology. J. Differ. Geom. 18, 279–315 (1983)
R. Dijkgraaf, P. Sulkowski, Instantons on ALE spaces and orbifold partitions. J. High Energy Phys. 0803, 013 (2008). [ arXiv:0712.1427 ]
J. Distler, E. Sharpe, Heterotic compactifications with principal bundles for general groups and general levels. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 14, 335–398 (2010). [ hep-th/0701244 ]
T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto, S. Gukov, Gauge theories labelled by three-manifolds. Commun. Math. Phys. 325 (2), 367–419 (2014)
T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto, S. Gukov, 3-Manifolds and 3d Indices. [ arXiv:1112.5179 ]
T. Dimofte, M. Gabella, A.B. Goncharov, K-Decompositions and 3d gauge theories (2013). [ arXiv:1301.0192 ]
T. Dimofte, S. Gukov, L. Hollands, Vortex counting and Lagrangian 3-manifolds. Lett. Math. Phys. 98, 225–287 (2011). [ arXiv:1006.0977 ]
R. Dijkgraaf, E.P. Verlinde, M. Vonk, On the partition sum of the NS five-brane (2002). [ hep-th/0205281 ]
R. Dijkgraaf, L. Hollands, P. Sulkowski, C. Vafa, Supersymmetric gauge theories, intersecting Branes and free fermions. J. High Energy Phys. 0802, 106 (2008). [ arXiv:0709.4446 ]
J. de Boer, R. Dijkgraaf, K. Hori, A. Keurentjes, J. Morgan, et al., Triples, fluxes, and strings. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4, 995–1186 (2002). [ hep-th/0103170 ]
M. Freedman, The topology of four dimensional manifolds. J. Differ. Geom. 17, 357–453 (1982)
M. Furuta, Y. Hashimoto, Invariant instantons on S 4. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math. 37 (3), 585–600 (1990)
D.S. Freed, E. Witten, Anomalies in string theory with D-branes. Asian J. Math. 3, 819 (1999). [ hep-th/9907189 ]
H. Fuji, S. Gukov, P. Sulkowski, Super-a-polynomial for knots and BPS states. Nucl. Phys. B867, 506–546 (2013). [ arXiv:1205.1515 ]
J. Fuchs, C. Schweigert, A. Velentino, Bicategories for boundary conditions and for surface defects in 3-d TFT. Commun. Math. Phys. 321 (2), 543–575 (2013)
H. Fuji, S. Gukov, P. Sulkowski, H. Awata, Volume conjecture: refined and categorified. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 16 (2), 1669–1777 (2012)
H. Fuji, S. Gukov, M. Stos̆ić, P. Sulkowski, 3d analogs of Argyres-Douglas theories and knot homologies. J. High Energy Phys. 2013, 175 (2003)
O.J. Ganor, Compactification of tensionless string theories (1996) [ hep-th/9607092 ]
S. Gukov, Three-dimensional quantum gravity, Chern-Simons theory, and the A-polynomial. Commun. Math. Phys. 255 (3), 577–627 (2005). [ hep-th/0306165 ]
S. Gukov, Gauge theory and knot homologies. Fortschr. Phys. 55, 473–490 (2007). [ arXiv:0706.2369 ]
D. Gaiotto, N=2 dualities. J. High Energy Phys. 1208, 034 (2012). [ arXiv:0904.2715 ]
T. Gannon, C. Lam, Gluing and shifting lattice constructions and rational equivalence. Rev. Math. Phys. 3 (03), 331–369 (1991)
T. Gannon, C. Lam, Lattices and \(\Theta\)-function identities. I: Theta constants. J. Math. Phys. 33, 854 (1992)
T. Gannon, C. Lam, Lattices and θ-function identities. II: Theta series. J. Math. Phys. 33, 871 (1992)
J.P. Gauntlett, N. Kim, M five-branes wrapped on supersymmetric cycles. 2.. Phys. Rev. D65, 086003 (2002). [ hep-th/0109039 ]
A. Giveon, D. Kutasov, Seiberg duality in Chern-Simons theory. Nucl. Phys. B812, 1–11 (2009). [ arXiv:0808.0360 ]
S. Gukov, D. Pei, Equivariant Verlinde formula from fivebranes and vortices (2015). [ arXiv:1501.0131 ]
R.E. Gompf, A.I. Stipsicz, 4-manifolds and Kirby calculus. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 20 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999)
D. Gaiotto, E. Witten, Supersymmetric boundary conditions in N=4 super Yang-Mills theory. J. Stat. Phys. 135, 789–855 (2009). [ arXiv:0804.2902 ]
A. Gadde, S. Gukov, P.J. Putrov, Walls, lines, and spectral dualities in 3d Gauge theories. J. High Energy Phys. 2014, 47 (2014)
J.P. Gauntlett, N. Kim, D. Waldram, M Five-branes wrapped on supersymmetric cycles. Phys. Rev. D63, 126001 (2001). [ hep-th/0012195 ]
D. Gaiotto, G.W. Moore, A. Neitzke, Four-dimensional wall-crossing via three-dimensional field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 299, 163–224 (2010). [ arXiv:0807.4723 ]
S.B. Giddings, J. Polchinski, A. Strominger, Four-dimensional black holes in string theory. Phys. Rev. D48, 5784–5797 (1993). [ hep-th/9305083 ]
S. Gukov, J. Sparks, D. Tong, Conifold transitions and five-brane condensation in M theory on spin(7) manifolds. Classical Quantum Gravity 20, 665–706 (2003). [ hep-th/0207244 ]
M.B. Green, J. Schwarz, E. Witten, Superstring Theory. vol. 1: Introduction, 1st edn. (Cambridge, New York, 1987)
S. Gukov, C. Vafa, E. Witten, CFT’s from Calabi-Yau four folds. Nucl. Phys. B584, 69–108 (2000). [ hep-th/9906070 ]
A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S.S. Razamat, W. Yan, The 4d superconformal index from q-deformed 2d Yang-Mills. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 241602 (2011). [ arXiv:1104.3850 ]
J.L. Harer, Pencils of Curves on 4-Manifolds (ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 1979). Thesis (Ph.D.)-University of California, Berkeley
A. Hanany, E. Witten, Type IIB superstrings, BPS monopoles, and three-dimensional gauge dynamics. Nucl. Phys. B492, 152–190 (1997). [ hep-th/9611230 ]
K. Hori, J. Walcher, D-branes from matrix factorizations. C. R. Phys. 5, 1061–1070 (2004). [ hep-th/0409204 ]
M. Itoh, Moduli of half conformally flat structures. Math. Ann. 296 (4), 687–708 (1993)
C.V. Johnson, Heterotic coset models. Mod. Phys. Lett. A10, 549–560 (1995). [ hep-th/9409062 ]
V.G. Kac, D.H. Petersen, Infinite-dimensional Lie algebras, theta functions and modular forms. Adv. Math. 53 (2), 125–264 (1984)
A. Kapustin, N. Saulina, Surface operators in 3d topological field theory and 2d rational conformal field theory, in Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory and Perturbative String Theory. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 83 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2011), pp. 175–198
A. Kapustin, N. Saulina, Topological boundary conditions in abelian Chern-Simons theory. Nucl. Phys. B845, 393–435 (2011). [ arXiv:1008.0654 ]
A. Kapustin, E. Witten, Electric-magnetic duality and the geometric Langlands program. Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 1, 1–236 (2007). [ hep-th/0604151 ]
A. Kapustin, B. Willett, Wilson loops in supersymmetric Chern-Simons-matter theories and duality (2007). [ arXiv:1302.2164 ]
T. Kitao, K. Ohta, N. Ohta, Three-dimensional gauge dynamics from brane configurations with (p,q) - five-brane. Nucl. Phys. B539, 79–106 (1999). [ hep-th/9808111 ]
R. Lockhart, Fredholm, Hodge and Liouville theorems on noncompact manifolds. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 301 (1), 1–35 (1987)
F. Laudenbach, V. Poénaru, A note on 4-dimensional handlebodies. Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 100, 337–344 (1972)
N. Marcus, The other topological twisting of N=4 Yang-Mills. Nucl. Phys. B452, 331–345 (1995). [ hep-th/9506002 ]
M. Mackaay, Spherical 2-categories and 4-manifold invariants. Adv. Math. 143 (2), 288–348 (1999)
J. Minahan, D. Nemeschansky, C. Vafa, N. Warner, E strings and N=4 topological Yang-Mills theories. Nucl. Phys. B527, 581–623 (1998). [ hep-th/9802168 ]
I.V. Melnikov, C. Quigley, S. Sethi, M. Stern, Target spaces from Chiral gauge theories. J. High Energy Phys. 1302, 111 (2013). [ arXiv:1212.1212 ]
R.A. Norman, Dehn’s lemma for certain 4-manifolds. Invent. Math. 7, 143–147 (1969)
H. Nakajima, Instantons on ALE spaces, quiver varieties, and Kac-Moody Algebras. Duke Math. 76, 365–416 (1994)
S. Nawata, P. Ramadevi, Zodinmawia, X. Sun, Super-A-polynomials for twist knots. J. High Energy Phys. 1211, 157 (2012). [ arXiv:1209.1409 ]
K. Ohta, Supersymmetric index and s rule for type IIB branes. J. High Energy Phys. 9910, 006 (1999). [ hep-th/9908120 ]
M. Oshikawa, I. Affleck, Boundary conformal field theory approach to the critical two-dimensional Ising model with a defect line. Nucl. Phys. B495, 533–582 (1997). [ cond-mat/9612187 ]
T. Okazaki, S. Yamaguchi, Supersymmetric boundary conditions in 3D N = 2 theories, in String-Math 2013. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 88 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2014), pp. 343–349
H. Pfeiffer, Quantum general relativity and the classification of smooth manifolds (2004). [ gr-qc/0404088 ]
F. Quinn, Ends of maps. I. Ann. Math. (2) 110 (2), 275–331 (1979)
F. Quinn, Ends of maps. III. Dimensions 4 and 5. J. Differ. Geom. 17 (3), 503–521 (1982)
T. Quella, V. Schomerus, Symmetry breaking boundary states and defect lines. J. High Energy Phys. 0206, 028 (2002). [ hep-th/0203161 ]
R. Rohm, Topological defects and Differential structures. Ann. Phys. 189, 223 (1989)
N. Saveliev, Fukumoto-Furuta invariants of plumbed homology 3-spheres. Pac. J. Math. 205 (2), 465–490 (2002)
J. Sladkowski, Exotic smoothness and astrophysics. Acta Physiol. Pol. B40, 3157–3163 (2009). [ arXiv:0910.2828 ]
A. Smilga, Witten index in supersymmetric 3d theories revisited. J. High Energy Phys. 1001, 086 (2010). [ arXiv:0910.0803 ]
N. Seiberg, E. Witten, Electric - magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory. Nucl. Phys. B426, 19–52 (1994). [ hep-th/9407087 ]
C. Vafa, E. Witten, A strong coupling test of S duality. Nucl. Phys. B431, 3–77 (1994). [ hep-th/9408074 ]
E. Witten, Elliptic genera and quantum field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 109, 525 (1987)
E. Witten, Topological quantum field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 117, 353 (1988)
E. Witten, The Verlinde algebra and the cohomology of the Grassmannian (1993). [ hep-th/9312104 ]
E. Witten, Phases of N=2 theories in two-dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B403, 159–222 (1993). [ hep-th/9301042 ]
E. Witten, Monopoles and four manifolds. Math. Res. Lett. 1, 769–796 (1994). [ hep-th/9411102 ]
N. Warner, Supersymmetry in boundary integrable models. Nucl. Phys. B450, 663–694 (1995). [ hep-th/9506064 ]
E. Witten, Five-brane effective action in M theory. J. Geom. Phys. 22, 103–133 (1997). [ hep-th/9610234 ]
E. Witten, Toroidal compactification without vector structure. J. High Energy Phys. 9802, 006 (1998). [ hep-th/9712028 ]
E. Witten, Supersymmetric index of three-dimensional gauge theory, in The Many Faces of the Superworld (World Scientific, River Edge, 2000), pp. 156–184
E. Witten, SL(2,Z) action on three-dimensional conformal field theories with Abelian symmetry, in From Fields to Strings: Circumnavigating Theoretical Physics, vol. 2 (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005), pp. 1173–1200
E. Wong, I. Affleck, Tunneling in quantum wires: a boundary conformal field theory approach. Nucl. Phys. B417, 403–438 (1994)
Acknowledgements
We thank F. Quinn, D. Roggenkamp, C. Schweigert, A. Stipsicz, and P. Teichner for patient and extremely helpful explanations. We also thank T. Dimofte, Y. Eliashberg, A. Kapustin, T. Mrowka, W. Neumann, T. Okazaki, E. Sharpe, C. Vafa, J. Walcher, and E. Witten, among others, for a wide variety of helpful comments. The work of A.G. is supported in part by the John A. McCone fellowship and by DOE Grant DE-FG02-92-ER40701. The work of S.G. is supported in part by DOE Grant DE-FG03-92-ER40701FG-02 and in part by NSF Grant PHY-0757647. The work of P.P. is supported in part by the Sherman Fairchild scholarship and by NSF Grant PHY-1050729. Opinions and conclusions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of funding agencies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: M5-Branes on Calibrated Submanifolds and Topological Twists
We study the twisted compactification of 6d (2, 0) theory on a four-manifold M 4. In each of the cases listed in Table 5, such compactification produces a superconformal theory T[M 4] in the two non-compact dimensions. Via the computation of the T 2 partition function explained in the main text, the cases (a)–(c) correspond to previously studied topological twists of \(\mathcal{N} = 4\) super-Yang-Mills which, in turn, are summarized in Table 6.
Specifically, in the first case (a) the \(\mathcal{N} = 4\) SYM is thought of as an \(\mathcal{N} = 2\) gauge theory with an extra adjoint multiplet and the Donaldson–Witten twist [Wit88]. Its path integral localizes on solutions to the non-abelian monopole equations. The untwisted rotation group of the DW theory is then twisted by the remaining SU(2) symmetry to obtain the case (b). This twist (a.k.a. GL twist) was first considered by Marcus [Mar95] and related to the geometric Langlands program in [KW07]. The last case (c) is of most interest to us as it corresponds to (0, 2) SCFT in 2d. On a 4-manifold M 4, this twist is the standard Vafa–Witten twist [VW94].
Appendix 2: Orthogonality of Affine Characters
The Weyl–Kac formula for affine characters of \(\widehat{\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{u}}(2)_{k}\) is
where
Using the Weyl–Kac denominator formula the character can be rewritten as
Consider the integral
This shows that \(\widehat{\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{u}}(2)_{k}\) characters are orthogonal with respect to the measure
but this measure is exactly the index of SU(2) (0, 2) vector multiplet. The orthogonality of \(\hat{\mathfrak{u}}(1)_{k}\) characters can be verified in a similar way. We conjecture that \(\widehat{\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{u}}(N)_{k}\) (\(\hat{\mathfrak{u}}(N)_{k}\)) characters are orthogonal with respect to SU(N) (U(N)) vector multiplet measure as well.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gadde, A., Gukov, S., Putrov, P. (2016). Fivebranes and 4-Manifolds. In: Ballmann, W., Blohmann, C., Faltings, G., Teichner, P., Zagier, D. (eds) Arbeitstagung Bonn 2013. Progress in Mathematics, vol 319. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43648-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43648-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43646-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43648-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)