Skip to main content

Geomorphometric Landscape Analysis of Agricultural Areas and Rangelands of Western Australia

  • Chapter
Geopedology
  • 1897 Accesses

Abstract

Several techniques exist for generating landform units and these differ in terms of their categorical structure. The geopedologic approach to landform classification is based on a strong integration of geomorphology and pedology using geomorphology as a tool to improve and speed up soil mapping. Likewise, the Australian classification of landforms proposes a two-level descriptive procedure for a systematic, parametric description of landforms into landform patterns and landform elements. This chapter examines geopedology in the context of soil-landscape studies in Australia, and discusses two case studies from Western Australia, where GIS-based geomorphometric tools were used for semi-automated classification of landform elements, based on topographic attributes like slope, curvature or elevation percentile. The case studies illustrate how results of the geomorphic classification add value to management decisions related to rangelands, precision agriculture, spatial analysis, and modelling of land degradation, and other spatial modelling applications where landscape morphometry is an influential factor in the processes under study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blaszczynski JS (1997) Landform characterization with geographic information systems. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 63(2):183–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Caccetta PA (2000) Technical note. A simple approach for reducing discontinuities in digital elevation models (DEMs), Report 2000/231. CSIRO, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Coops NC, Gallant JC, Loughhead AN, Mackey BJ, Ryan PJ, Mullen IC, Austin MP (1998) Developing and testing procedures to predict topographic position from digital elevation models (DEMs) for species mapping (Phase 1). Report to Environment Australia, Client report 271. CSIRO FFP, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikau R, Brabb EE, Mark RM (1991) Landform classification of New Mexico by computer, Open file report 91-634. US Geological Survey, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  • Drăguţ L, Blaschke T (2006) Automated classification of landform elements using object-based image analysis. Geomorphology 81:330–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallant JC, Wilson JP (2000) Primary topographic attributes. In: Wilson JP, Gallant JC (eds) Terrain analysis, principles and applications. Wiley, New York, pp 51–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallant JC, Dowling TI, Read AM, Wilson N, Tickle P, Inskeep C (2011) 1 second SRTM derived digital elevation models user guide. Geoscience Australia, Canberra. Available at www.ga.gov.au/topographic-mapping/digital- elevation-data.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Gessler PE, Moore ID, McKenzie NJ, Ryan PJ (1995) Soil-landscape modelling and spatial prediction of soil attributes. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 9(4):421–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen A (2003) Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 17(3):235–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen-Zanker A, Straatman B, Uljee I (2005) Further developments of a fuzzy set map comparison approach. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 19(7):769–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hengl T, Reuter HI (eds) (2009) Geomorphometry – concepts, software, applications, vol 33, Developments in Soil Science. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingseisen B, Metternicht G, Paulus G (2008) Geomorphometric landscape analysis using a semi-automated GIS-approach. Environ Model Software 23:109–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klingseisen B, Warren G, Metternicht G (2004) Landform: GIS based generation of topographic attributes for landform classification in Australia. In: Strobl J, Blaschke T, Griesebner G (eds) Angewandte Geoinformatik 2004, Beiträge zum 16 AGIT-Symposium, Salzburg. Wichmann, Heidelberg, pp 344–353

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan RA, Shary PA (2009) Landforms and landform elements in geomorphometry. In: Hengl T, Reuter HI (eds) Geomorphometry – concepts, software, applications, vol 33, Developments in soil science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 227–254

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie NJ, Ryan PJ (1999) Spatial prediction of soil properties using environmental correlation. Geoderma 89:67–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie NJ, Gessler PE, Ryan PJ, O’Connell DA (2000) The role of terrain analysis in soil mapping. In: Wilson JP, Gallant JC (eds) Terrain analysis, principles and applications. Wiley, New York, pp 245–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Gessler PE, Nielsen GA, Peterson GA (1993) Terrain analysis for soil specific crop management. In: Robert PC, Rust RC, Larson WE (eds) Proceedings of first workshop, soil specific crop management. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 27–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn P, Beven K, Chevallier P, Planchon O (1991) The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modeling using digital terrain models. Hydrological Processes 5:59–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauter M (2006) GIS-gestützte Analyse zur Berechnung potenzieller Lawinenabbruchgebiete. In: Strobl J, Blaschke T, Griesebner G (eds) Angewandte Geoinformatik 2006, Beiträge zum 18 AGIT-Symposium, Salzburg. Wichmann, Heidelberg, pp 569–578

    Google Scholar 

  • RIKS (2006) Map comparison kit home page. Available from: http://www.riks.nl/mck/

  • Schoknecht N (2003) Land unit mapping for the Ord and Keep River catchments. Department of Agriculture Western Australia, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore AK (1990) Terrain position as mapped from a gridded digital elevation model. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 4:33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speight JG (1974) A parametric approach to landform regions. In: Brown EH, Waters RS (eds) Progress in geomorphology. Alden Press, London, pp 213–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Speight JG (1990) Landform. In: McDonald et al (eds) Australian soil and land survey field handbook, 2nd edn. Inkata Press, Melbourne, pp 9–57

    Google Scholar 

  • The National Committee on Soil and Terrain (2009) Australian soil and land survey field handbook, 3rd edn. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventura SJ, Irvin BJ (2000) Automated landform classification methods for soil-landscape studies. In: Wilson JP, Gallant JC (eds) Terrain analysis, principles and applications. Wiley, New York, pp 245–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser H, de Nijs T (2006) The map comparison kit. Environ Model Software 21(3):346–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren G, Metternicht G, Speijers J (2005) Creating land management units on high resolution remote sensing data and DEM derived terrain attributes using spatially weighted multivariate classification. In: Proceedings of the Pecora 16 “Global Priorities in Land Remote Sensing”, 23–27 October 2005, Sioux Falls, South Dakota. CD-rom

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren G, Metternicht G, Speyers J (2006) Use of a spatially weighted multivariate classification of soil properties, terrain and remote sensing data to form land management units. ASPRS 2006 annual conference, Reno

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D, Corner R (2011) Classification and use of landform information to increase the accuracy of land condition monitoring in Western Australian pastoral rangelands. ISDE 7, 23–25 August 2011, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D, Corner R, Schut T (2012) Object based data fusion of landform and ancillary data for upscaling soil-landscape mapping in the Western Australian rangelands. IGARSS 2012, 23–25 August 2011, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood J (2009) The LandSerf manual. User guide for LandSerf. Available from: http://www.soi.city.ac.uk/~jwo/landserf/

  • Zevenbergen LW, Thorne CR (1987) Quantitative analysis of land surface topography. Earth Surf Process Landf 12:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research underlying the two case studies was funded by a grant of the Australian Research Council, within the ARC-Linkage programme. The authors also acknowledge SpecTerra Services, the Muresk Institute of Agriculture, and the Department of Agriculture and Food of Western Australia for providing data and expert knowledge as well as assistance with field operations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Klingseisen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klingseisen, B., Metternicht, G., Paulus, G., Wilson, D. (2016). Geomorphometric Landscape Analysis of Agricultural Areas and Rangelands of Western Australia. In: Zinck, J.A., Metternicht, G., Bocco, G., Del Valle, H.F. (eds) Geopedology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19159-1_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics