Skip to main content
  • 720 Accesses

Abstract

The intent of this chapter is to illustrate various organisational theories that were developed in the last century, beginning from “scientific management”, also called “Taylorism”, to the more recent theories of “population ecology”, “new institutionalism” and “transaction cost theory”. We will illustrate the current state of organisational theories and follow its evolution along paths both convergent and divergent, before arriving at a point where an unequivocal understanding of organisational theories and models is difficult. Our attention will then turn to neo-institutional theory, and we will explore how organisations attempt to incorporate norms by drawing from their environments. Here, we illustrate the concept of “institutional isomorphism” as a fundamental explanation for the homogenisation of organisational forms and compliance to norms and laws by articulating three distinct types: “mimetic isomorphism”, “normative isomorphism” and “coercive isomorphism”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Burns T, Stalker G (1961) The management of innovation. Tavistock, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier M (1963) Le Phénoméne Bureaucratique. Editions du Servil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis GF (1991) Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate net-work. Adm Sci Q 36:583–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48(2):147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin F, Sutton JR (1998) The strength of a weak state: the rights revolution and the rise of human resources management divisions. Am J Sociol 104:441–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson L (1987) Strategy and structural adjustment to regain fit and performance: in defense of contingency theory. J Manag Stud 24(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson L (2001) The contingency theory of organizations. Foundations for organizational science. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman LB (1990) Legal environments and organizational governance: the expansion of due process in the American workplace. Am J Sociol 95:1401–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman LB (1992) Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: organizational mediation of civil rights law. Am J Sociol 97:1513–1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Empson L (2006) Professionals in partnership. In: John C (ed) Production values: futures of professionalism. Demos, London, pp 144–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayol H (1930) Industrial and general administration (trans: Coubrough JA). Sir Isaac Pitman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall R (1991) Organizations: structures, processes and outcomes. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan MT, Freeman J (1977) The population ecology of organizations. Am J Sociol 82(5):929–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haveman HA (1993) Follow the leader: mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Adm Sci Q 38:564–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence P, Lorsch J (1967) Organization and environment. Harvard Business School, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Leicht KT, Fennel LM (2008) Institutionalism and the professions. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, Sahlin-Andersson K (eds) The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 431–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo E (1933) The human problems of an industrial civilization. Harvard, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton R (1949) Social theory and social structure. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Sociol 83(2):340–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver C (1997) Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource-based views. Strateg Manag J 18:697–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi W (1979) A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Manag Sci 25(9):833–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings J (1975) The relevance of the structural contingency model for organizational effectiveness. Adm Sci Q 20:393–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings J (1992) Structural contingency theory: a reappraisal. Res Organ Behav 14:267–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow C (1961) The analysis of goals in complex organizations. Am Sociol Rev 26:854–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J (1982) Organizations and organization theory. Ballinger, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J, Salancik G (1978) The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Harper&Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh D (1973) The measurement of organization structures: does the context determine form? Organ Dyn 1:19–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh D, Hickson DF, Hinings CR, Turner C (1968) Dimension of organizational structure. Adm Sci Q 13:65–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott WR (1987) The adolescence of institutional theory. Adm Sci Q 32(4):493–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott WR (1995) Institutions and organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick P (1948) Foundations of the theory of organization. Am Sociol Rev 13(1):25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selznick P (1949) TVA and the grass roots: a study in the sociology of formal organization. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor FW (1911) The principles of scientific management. Harper & Brothers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson J (1967) Organization in action. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert PS, Zucker LG (1983) Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: the diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935. Adm Sci Q 28:22–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trist E, Bamforth K (1951) Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal getting. Hum Relat 4:3–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1921) Economy and society. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson O (1975) Markets and hierarchies. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J (1958) Management and technology. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Previtali, P. (2015). Organisational Theories and Models. In: Innovative Accreditation Standards in Education and Training. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16916-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics