Skip to main content

Forecasting Properties of Neural Network Generated Volatility Estimates

  • Chapter
Decision Technologies for Computational Finance

Part of the book series: Advances in Computational Management Science ((AICM,volume 2))

Abstract

The price of an option, from an arbitrage pricing model, as an estimate of the option’s fair market value is only as good as the volatility measures being used. Investors having access to superior forecasts of future volatility are likely to devise trading strategies that would generate profits by identifying mispriced options. The extant literature considers informational efficiency and finds that implied volatility is not an unbiased forecast of future volatility. The analysis suggests that implied volatility is related to moneyness, time to maturity and the ratio of put-to-call trading volume, however, the exact functional relation is unknown. In the absence of a known functional form, artificial neural networks (ANN) can generate a model that captures this systematic relationship. Results using equity option data show that, in general, neural networks do not produce superior estimates of future volatility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahmed P. and S. Swidler, “The Relation Between the Informational Content of Implied Volatility and Arbitrage Costs: Evidence from the Oslo Stock Exchange”, forthcoming in International Review of Economics and Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canina L. and S. Figlewski, “The Information Content of Implied Volatility”, The Review of Financial Studies, 1993; 6, 659–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi S., and M.E. Wohar, “Implied Volatility in Options Markets and Conditional Heteroscedasticity in Stock Markets”, The Financial Review, 1992; 27, 503–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke R.G., “Estimating and Using Volatility: Part 2”, Derivatives Quarterly, 1994; 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox J.C., S.A. Ross, and M. Rubinstein “Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach”, Journal of Financial Economics, 1979; 7, 229–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derman E., and I. Kani Riding on a Smile, Risk, 1994; 7(4), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumas B., J. Fleming, and R.E. Whaley “Implied Volatility Smiles: Empirical Tests”, Duke University Working Paper, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  • Figlewski S. “What Does an Option Pricing Model Tell Us About Option Prices”, Financial Analysts Journal, 1989; 12–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrow R.A., and A. Rudd, Option Pricing, 1983; Richard D. Irwin, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee T,. H. White, and C.W.J. Granger “Testing for Neglected Nonlinearity in Time Series Models”, Journal of Econometrics, 1993; 56, 269–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malliaris M. And L. Salchenberger, “Neural Networks for Predicting Options Volatility”, in Proceedings of World Congress on Neural Networks, 1994; Vol 2, San Diego, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 290–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein M. “Implied Binomial Tree”, Journal of Finance, 1994; 49 (3), 771–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein J. “Overreaction in the Options Market”, Journal of Finance, 1989; 44, 1011–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White H. “Learning Artificial Neural Network Models: A Statistical Perspective“, Neural Computation, 1989a; 1,425–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White H. “An additional Hidden Unit Test for Neglected Non-Linearity in Multilayer Feedforward Networks”, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 1989c; Washington DC. IEEE Press, New York, 2, 451–455

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ahmed, P., Swidler, S. (1998). Forecasting Properties of Neural Network Generated Volatility Estimates. In: Refenes, AP.N., Burgess, A.N., Moody, J.E. (eds) Decision Technologies for Computational Finance. Advances in Computational Management Science, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5625-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5625-1_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-8309-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5625-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics