Abstract
The price of an option, from an arbitrage pricing model, as an estimate of the option’s fair market value is only as good as the volatility measures being used. Investors having access to superior forecasts of future volatility are likely to devise trading strategies that would generate profits by identifying mispriced options. The extant literature considers informational efficiency and finds that implied volatility is not an unbiased forecast of future volatility. The analysis suggests that implied volatility is related to moneyness, time to maturity and the ratio of put-to-call trading volume, however, the exact functional relation is unknown. In the absence of a known functional form, artificial neural networks (ANN) can generate a model that captures this systematic relationship. Results using equity option data show that, in general, neural networks do not produce superior estimates of future volatility.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ahmed P. and S. Swidler, “The Relation Between the Informational Content of Implied Volatility and Arbitrage Costs: Evidence from the Oslo Stock Exchange”, forthcoming in International Review of Economics and Finance.
Canina L. and S. Figlewski, “The Information Content of Implied Volatility”, The Review of Financial Studies, 1993; 6, 659–681.
Choi S., and M.E. Wohar, “Implied Volatility in Options Markets and Conditional Heteroscedasticity in Stock Markets”, The Financial Review, 1992; 27, 503–530.
Clarke R.G., “Estimating and Using Volatility: Part 2”, Derivatives Quarterly, 1994; 35–40.
Cox J.C., S.A. Ross, and M. Rubinstein “Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach”, Journal of Financial Economics, 1979; 7, 229–263.
Derman E., and I. Kani Riding on a Smile, Risk, 1994; 7(4), 2–9.
Dumas B., J. Fleming, and R.E. Whaley “Implied Volatility Smiles: Empirical Tests”, Duke University Working Paper, 1995
Figlewski S. “What Does an Option Pricing Model Tell Us About Option Prices”, Financial Analysts Journal, 1989; 12–15
Jarrow R.A., and A. Rudd, Option Pricing, 1983; Richard D. Irwin, IL.
Lee T,. H. White, and C.W.J. Granger “Testing for Neglected Nonlinearity in Time Series Models”, Journal of Econometrics, 1993; 56, 269–290
Malliaris M. And L. Salchenberger, “Neural Networks for Predicting Options Volatility”, in Proceedings of World Congress on Neural Networks, 1994; Vol 2, San Diego, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 290–295.
Rubinstein M. “Implied Binomial Tree”, Journal of Finance, 1994; 49 (3), 771–818
Stein J. “Overreaction in the Options Market”, Journal of Finance, 1989; 44, 1011–1023
White H. “Learning Artificial Neural Network Models: A Statistical Perspective“, Neural Computation, 1989a; 1,425–464
White H. “An additional Hidden Unit Test for Neglected Non-Linearity in Multilayer Feedforward Networks”, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 1989c; Washington DC. IEEE Press, New York, 2, 451–455
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ahmed, P., Swidler, S. (1998). Forecasting Properties of Neural Network Generated Volatility Estimates. In: Refenes, AP.N., Burgess, A.N., Moody, J.E. (eds) Decision Technologies for Computational Finance. Advances in Computational Management Science, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5625-1_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5625-1_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-8309-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5625-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive