Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Urbanization,avian communities,and landscape ecology

  • Chapter
Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World

Abstract

Human settlement is a prevalent source of land-use change worldwide, but our understanding of the effects of settlement on avian communities is limited. Settlement has been characterized as a gradient that extends from urban development to exurban and rural areas. An important advantage of the gradient approach is the potential to identify thresholds in the response of birds to settlement. Although gradients have been used in studying the effects of urbanization on birds, relatively little attention has been paid to the exurban end of the spectrum, despite the potential for this type of development to affect large expanses of habitat. Studies at relatively fine scales are useful for investigating the influence of proximate factors, such as vegetation structure and composition, on birds in human-dominated areas. However, such studies must be coupled with investigations at broader scales to gain a more complete understanding of the ways that human settlement affects bird communities. Urban-wildland gradients can be quantified using remotely-sensed imagery in combination with data on the intensity and pattern of settlement. However, metrics used to describe patterns of settlement are only useful to the extent that they represent something meaningful to birds. The extent of the landscape mosaic surrounding a study site that neEDS to be quantified depends on the goals for a particular study. We propose a research protocol for studying the effects of settlement on birds that may be useful at multiple scales. Study sites are distributed among land-cover and settlement types, and replicated surveys are progressively aggregated from small to large scales. These data serve as the basis for interpolation, using traditional statistical tools and geostatistical methods, to areas not sampled. To be effective, conservation must be focused on landscape mosaics, not habitat patches. Areas where people live and work are important components of these mosaics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alberti, M., E. Botsford, and A. Cohen. 2001. Quantifying the urban gradient: linking urban planning and ecology, p. 89–115. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, J. W., and R. W. Coffin. 1980. Breeding bird populations from forest to suburbia after thirty-seven years. Amer. Birds 34:3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., E. E. Hardy, J. T. Roach, and W. E. Witmer. 1976. A land-use and land-cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. USGS Professional Paper 964. USGS, Reston, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andren, H. 1992. Corvid density and nest predation in relation to forest fragmentation: a landscape perspective. Ecology 73:794–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatley, T. 1994. Habitat conservation planning. University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger, S. R., and D. R. Osborne. 1982. Effects of urbanization on avian community organization. Condor 84:75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, A. F. 1991. Roads, roadsides and wildlife conservation: a review, p.99–117. In D. A. Saunders and R. J. Hobbs [EDS.], Nature conservation 2: the role of corridors. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, NSW, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B. J. L. 1990. Urbanization, p.103–120. In B. L. I. Turner, W. C. Clark, R. W. Kates, J. F. Richards, J. T. Mathews, and W. B. Meyer [EDS.], The earth as transformed by human action. Cambridge University Press, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R. B. 1996. Land-use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol. Appl. 6:506–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R. 2001. Creating a homogeneous avifauna, p. 461–488. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, D. 2001. Urban birds: population, community, and landscape approaches, p. 155–177. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, D. T., T. A. Scott, and J. T. Rotenberry. 1997. Breeding bird abundance in an urbanizing landscape in coastal Southern California. Conserv. Biol. 11:406–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D. and A. Begazo. 2001. Mccaw abundance in relation to human population density, p. 429–439. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero, C. 1989. Avian community structure in a large urban park: controls of local richness and diversity. Land. Urban Plann. 17: 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clergeau, P., J. P. L. Savard, G. Mennechez, and G. Falardeau. 1998. Bird abundance and diversity along an urban-rural gradient: A comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor 100:413–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M. L. 1975. Towards a theory of continental species diversities: bird distributions over mediterranean habitat gradients, p.214–257. In M. L. Cody and J. M. Diamond [EDS.], Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. 1997. Conservation and human population growth: what are the linkages?, p.29–42. In S. T. A. Pickett [ED.], The ecological basis of conservation: heterogeneity, ecosystems, and biodiversity. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullingworth, B. 1997. Planning in the USA: policies, issues, and processes. Routledge, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darveau, M., P. Beauchesne, L. Belanger, J. Huot, and P. Larue. 1995. Riparian forest strips as habitat for breeding birds in boreal habitat. J. Wildl. Manage. 59:67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGraaf, R. M., and J. M. Wentworth. 1986. Avian guild structure and habitat associations in suburban bird communities. Urban Ecol. 9:399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGrove, J. M. 1992. Planning and growth management in the States. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duerksen, C. J., D. L. Elliot, N. T. Hobbs, E. Johnson, and J. R. Miller. 1997. Habitat protection planning: where the wild things are. Amer. Planning Assoc. Planning Advisory Serv. Rep. No. 470–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, T. M., and C. W. Sexton. 1994. Negative correlation of Blue Jays and Golden-cheeked Warblers near an urbanizing area. Conserv. Biol. 8:286–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, C. R. 1979. Effects of Interstate 95 on breeding birds in northern Maine. J. Wildl. Manage. 43:421–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T. 1995. Land mosaics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T., and L. Alexander. 1998. Roads and their major ecological effects. Ann. Rev. Ecology Syst. 29:207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraterrigo, J. M. 2000. Low-density settlement in the Rocky Mountain West: effects on bird communities and landscape patterns. M.S. thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, L. E., P. F. J. Eagles, and R. J. MacKay. 1995. Effects of residential development on forest-dwelling neotropical migrant songbirds. Conserv. Biol. 9:1408–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavareski, C. A. 1976. Relation of park size and vegetation to urban bird populations in Seattle, Washington. Condor 78:375–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geis, A. D. 1974. Effects of urbanization and type of urban development on bird populations, p.97–105. In J. H. Noyes and D. R. Progulski [EDS.], Wildlife in an Urbanizing Environment. November 27–29, 1973, Springfield, Massachusetts. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germaine, S. S., S. S. Rosenstock, R. E. Schweinsburg, and W. S. Richardson. 1998. Relationships among breeding birds, habitat, and residential development in greater Tucson, Arizona. Ecol. Appl. 8:680–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gittens, R. 1968. Trend-surface analysis of ecological data. J. Ecology 56:845–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. J., C. P. Catterall, and D. N. Jones. 1989. Foraging and other behaviour of birds in subtropical and temperate suburban habitats. Emu 89:216–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, E. J. 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosys. 1:143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, D. A. 1974. Suburban bird populations in southern California. Am. Midi. Nat. 92:461–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanowski, J. M., and G. J. Niemi. 1995. A comparison of on- and off-road bird counts: Do you need to go off road to count birds accurately? J. Field Ornithology 66:469–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargrove, W. W., and J. Pickering. 1992. Pseudo-replication: a sine qua non for regional ecology. Landscape Ecol. 6:251–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. D. 1988. Edge effects and conservation of biotic diversity. Conserv. Biol. 2:330–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, D., A. M. Knupp, and M. C. Schneider. 2001. Nest predator abundance and urbanization, p. 245–260. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilden, O. 1965. Habitat selection in birds. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 2:53–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, M. F. J., and D. G. Krementz. 1996. Neotropical migratory breeding bird communities in riparian forests of different widths along the Altamaha River, Georgia.Wilson Bull. 108:496–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hostetler, M. 2001. The importance of multi-scale analyses in avian habitat selection studies in urban environments, p. 139–154. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, J., E. McMahon, and L. Propst. 1997. Balancing nature and commerce in gateway communities. Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokimaki, J., and J. Suhonen. 1993. Effects of urbanization on the breeding bird species richness in Finland: a biogeographical comparison. Ornis Fenn. 70:71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., and R. R. Roth. 1971. Vegetation structure and avian diversity in several new world areas. Am. Nat. 105:423–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. L., G. N. Wallace, and W. E. Riebsame. 1995. Ranching the view: subdivisions versus agriculture. Conserv. Biol. 459–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knick, S. T., and J. T. Rotenberry. 1996. Landscape characteristics of fragmented shrubsteppe habitats and breeding passerine birds. Conserv. Biol. 9:1059–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knopf, F. L., and F. B. Samson. 1994. Scale perspectives on avian diversity in western riparian ecosystems. Conserv. Biol. 8:669–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. N. 1993. Compass and gyroscope: integrating science and politics for the environment. Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limerick, P. N. 1987. The legacy of conquest. W. W. Norton & Company, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H., and J. W. MacArthur. 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42:594–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, R. E., G. Gowing, and C. E. Kendal. 1996. Nest predation in Australian urban environments and the role of the Pied Currawong, Strepera graculina. Aust. J. Ecol. 21:399–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, J. M. 2001. Worldwide increase in urbanization and its effects on birds, p. 19–47. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, J. M., R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly. 2001. A historical perspective on urban bird research: trends, terms and approaches, p. 1–17. InJ. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, J. M., F. R. Gehlbach, and D. A. Manuwal. 1998. Urban environments: influences on avifauna and challenges for the avian conservationist. In J. M. Marzluff and R. Sallabanks [EDS.], Avian conservation: research and management. Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, J. M., and M. Restani. 1999. The effects of forest fragmentation on avian nest predation, p. 155–169. In J. A. Rochelle, L. A. Lehmann, and J. Wisniewski [EDS.], Forest fragmentation. Wildlife and management implications. Brill, Leiden, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M. J., and S. T. A. Pickett. 1990. Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71:1232–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. R., and N. T. Hobbs. 2000. Effects of recreational trails on nest predation rates and predator assemblages. Land. Urban Plann. 50:227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. R., J. A. Wiens, and N. T. Hobbs. 2001. How does urbanization affect bird communities in riparian habitats? An approach and preliminary assessment, p.427–439. In J. Craig, N. Mitchell, and D. Saunders [EDS.], Nature conservation 5. Nature conservation in production environments: Managing the matrix. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping-Norton, New South Wales, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumme, R. L., S. J. Schoech, G. E. Wooflenden, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 2000. Life in the fast lane: Demographic consequences of road mortality in the Florida Scrub-Jay. Cons. Biol. 14: 501–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, A. 1992. Characterizing exurbia. J. Planning Lit. 6:350–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilon, C. H., C. N. Long, and W. C. Zipperer. 1995. Effects of wildland development on forest bird communities. Land. Urban Plann. 32:81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRCS. 1995. USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service, National Res. Inv. http://www.nhq.nrcs.usda.gov/NRI/tables/1992/table.7.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dell, E. 2000. Wildlife communities and exurban development in Pitkin County, Colorado. M.S. Thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, P., and L. Osborne. 1980. The contribution of nest site characteristics to breeding-success among Blackbirds Turdus mercula. Ibis 122:512–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. 1991. Managing the commons. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, S. M. 1993. The spatial extent and relative influence of landscape-level factors on wintering bird populations. Landscape Ecol. 8:3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reijnen, R., R. Foppen, C. ter Braak, and J. Thissen. 1995. The effects of car traffic on breeding bird populations in woodland. III. Reduction in density in relation to the proximity of main roads. J. of Appl. Ecol. 32:187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reijnen, R., R. Foppen, and H. Meeuwsen. 1996. The effects of traffic on the density of breeding birds in Dutch agricultural grasslands. Biol. Conserv. 75:255–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riebsame, W. E., H. Gosnell, and D. M. Theobald. 1996. Land-use and landscape change in the Colorado mountains I: Theory, scale, and pattern. Mount. Res. and Devel. 16: 395–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, G. P. 1987. Geostatistics in ecology: Interpolating with known variance. Ecology 63:744–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolando, A., G. Maffei, C. Pulcher, and A. Giuso. 1997. Avian community structure along an urbanization gradient. Italian J. of Zool. 64:341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romme, W. H. 1997. Creating pseudo-rural landscapes in the mountain west, p. 139–161. In J. I. Nassauer [ED.], Placing nature. Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saab, V. 1999. Importance of spatial scale to habitat use by breeding birds in riparian forests: a hierarchical analysis. Ecol. Appl. 9:135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. A., R. J. Hobbs, and P. R. Ehrlich. 1993. Nature conservation 3: Reconstruction of fragmented ecosystems, global and regional perspectives. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, NSW, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savard, J. P. and J. B. Falls. 2001. Bird-habitat relationships of breeding birds in residential areas of Toronto, Canada, p. 543–568. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. A. and C. J. Whelan. 1999. Effects of exotic Lonicera and Rhamnus on songbird nest predation. Cons. Biol. 13: 1502–1506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. W. 1996. Effects of European settlement and land-use on regional patterns of similarity among Chesapeake forests. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 123: 223–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. W. 1997. Conservation in highly fragmented landscapes. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. F., and M. L. Hunter. 1988. Forest fragmentation and avian nest predation in forested landscapes. Oecologia 76:62–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. H. 1993. The citizen’s guide to planning. American Planning Association, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi, N. S. 1992. Comparison between urban and rural bird communities in prairie Saskatchewan: urbanization and short-term population trends. Can. Field-Nat. 106:210–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, D. F., and L. B. Best. 1980. Habitat selection by birds of riparian communities: evaluating effects of habitat alterations. J. Wildl. Manage. 44:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szaro, R. C, and M. D. Jakle. 1985. Avian use of a desert riparian island and its adjacent scrub habitat. Condor 87:511–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J. 1971. Distribution on environmental gradients: theory and a preliminary interpretation of distributional patterns in the avifauna of the Cordillera Vilcabamba, Peru. Ecology 52:23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theobald, D.M. 2000. Fragmentation by inholdings and exurban development, p. 155–174. In R.L. Knight, F.W. Smith, S.W. Buskirk, W.H. Romme, and W.L. Baker, [EDS.], Forest fragmentation in the central Rocky Mountains. University Press of Colorado, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theobald, D.M. and N. T. Hobbs. 1998. Forecasting rural land-use change: a comparison of regression- and spatial transition-based models. Geog. Env. Mod. 2: 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theobald, D. M., N. T. Hobbs, T. Bearly, J. A. Zack, T. Shenk, and W. E. Riebsame. 2000. Incorporating biological information in local land-use decision making: designing a system for conservation planning. Landscape Ecol. 15: 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theobald, D. M., J. R. Miller, and N. T. Hobbs. 1997. Estimating the cumulative effects of development on wildlife habitat. Land. Urban Plann. 39:25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilghman, N. G. 1987. Characteristics of urban woodlands affecting breeding bird diversity and abundance. Land. Urban Plann. 14:481–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G., R. H. Gardner, and R. V. O’Neill. 2000. Pattern and process: landscape ecology in theory and practice. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Centre for Human Settlements. 1996. An urbanising world: global report on human settlements, 1996. Oxford University Press for the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat), Oxford, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Bureau of the Census. 1998. Statistical abstract of the United States. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vale, T. R., and G. R. Vale. 1976. Suburban bird populations in west-central California. J. Biogeogr. 3:157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Der Zande, A., W. Ter Keurs, and W. Van Der Weijden. 1980. The impact of roads on the densities of four bird species in an open field habitat - evidence of a long-distance effect. Biol. Conserv. 18:299–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H. 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol. Rev. 42:207–264.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Func. Ecol. 3:385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A., and J. T. Rotenberry. 1981. Habitat associations and community structure of birds in shrubsteppe environments. Ecol. Monogr. 51:21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willson, M. F. 1974. Avian community organization and habitat structure. Ecology 55:1017–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Degree Program in Ecology/Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA

    James R. Miller & Jennifer M. Fraterrigo

  2. Colorado Division of Wildlife, 317 West Prospect, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA

    N. Thompson Hobbs

  3. Natural Resource Ecology Lab, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA

    N. Thompson Hobbs, David M. Theobald & John A. Wiens

Authors
  1. James R. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jennifer M. Fraterrigo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N. Thompson Hobbs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David M. Theobald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. John A. Wiens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, USA

    John M. Marzluff  & Roarke Donnelly  & 

  2. Archbold Biological Station, USA

    Reed Bowman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miller, J.R., Fraterrigo, J.M., Hobbs, N.T., Theobald, D.M., Wiens, J.A. (2001). Urbanization,avian communities,and landscape ecology. In: Marzluff, J.M., Bowman, R., Donnelly, R. (eds) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5600-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1531-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation