Skip to main content

Abstract

We used infra-red triggered cameras, point counts, footprint monitors, and artificial nests baited with quail eggs to investigate the abundance of potential nest predators at 75 sites spread across a gradient of housing density in Franklin County, Tennessee. The total number of predators detected at each site showed a shallow positive rise with increasing housing density. Blue Jays (Cyanocitta cristata), domestic cats (Catus silvestris), raccoons (Procyon lotor), and opossums (Didelphis marsupialis) all increased in abundance, American Crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) decreased in abundance, and the abundance of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) was not related to housing density. Thus, in our study area, urbanization may increase populations of some nest predators, but not of others. The probability of predation on artificial nests containing a quail egg did not change with housing density, and quail egg predation was correlated only with the presence of raccoons and American Crows. These data suggest that quail eggs may not be an appropriate method for studying rates of predation on eggs or nestlings in urban settings, but may be helpful for assessing the abundance of American Crows and raccoons. More information is needed about how changes in the abundance of predators translates into changes in rates of predation on bird nests, and for studies of how urbanization affects populations of nest predators in regions other than North America and Europe. We also outline two parallel studies of economics and policy that may provide ways to connect conservation biology with changes in land-use planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adkins, C. A., and P. Stott. 1998. Home ranges, movements and habitat associations of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in suburban Toronto, Ontario, Canada. J. Zool. (Lond.) 244:335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger, S. R., and D. R. Osborne. 1982. Effects of urbanization on avian community organization. Condor 84:75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R. B. 1996. Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol. Appl. 6:506–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, R., and G. Woolfenden. 2001. Nest success and the timing of nest failure of Florida Scrub-Jays in suburban and wildland habitats, p. 385–404. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockett, C. D., and L. Gebhard. 1999. NIPF tax incentives: do they make a difference? J. Forestry 97:16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, D. M., and E. Nol. 1998. Influence of food abundance, nest-site habitat, and forest fragmentation on breeding ovenbirds. Auk 115:96–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churcher, P. B., and J. H. Lawton. 1987. Predation by domestic cats in an English village. J. Zool. (Lond.) 212:439–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S., and S. A. Temple. 1993. Rural residents’ free-ranging domestic cats: a survey. Wildl.Soc. Bull. 21:381–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooks, K. R., and M. E. Soulé. 1999. Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400:563–566.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, N., and R. Blair. 2001. Do temporal trends in Christmas Bird Counts reflect the spatial trends of urbanization in southwestern Ohio, p. 525–542. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielson, W. R., R. M. DeGraaf, and T. K. Fuller. 1997. Rural and suburban forest edges: effect on egg predators and nest predation rates. Landsc. Urb. Plan. 38:25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGraaf, R. M., and T. J. Maier. 1996. Effect of egg size on predation by white-footed mice. Wilson Bull. 108:535–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doncaster, C. P., and D. W. Macdonald. 1997. Activity patterns and interactions of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Oxford city. J. Zool. (Lond.) 241:73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, J. T. 1974. An urban bird community in Tuscon, Arizona: derivation, structure, regulation. Condor 76:184–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, L., M. D. Cadman, and R. J. MacKay. 1999. Nesting success of neotropical migrant songbirds in a highly fragmented landcape. Conserv. Biol. 13:338–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, D. G. 1995a. Forest fragmentation and nest-predation: Are experiments with Japanese Quail eggs misleading? Auk 112:767–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, D. G. 1995b. A reevaluation of the effects of forest fragmentation on rates of bird-nest predation. Conserv. Biol. 9:1316–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, D. G. 2000. Effects of forest roads on macroinvertebrate soil fauna of the Southern Appalachians mountains. Conserv. Biol. 14:57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogrefe T. C, R. H. Yahner, and N. H. Piergallini. 1998. Depredation of artificial ground nests in a suburban versus a rural landscape. J. Penn. Acad. Sci. 72:3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horchem, J. D., and R. R. Gottfried. 1998. Growth: boon or bane? A report of the Cumberland Center for Conservation and Sustainable Development, Sewanee, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberg, O., and M. Sandell. 1988. Spatial organisation and reproductive tactics in the domestic cat and other felids, p. 83–98. In D.C. Turner and P. Bateson (EDS.), The domestic cat. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luoma, J. R. 1997. Catfight. Audubon 99:85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, D. 1987. Running with the fox. Unwin Hyman, London-Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, R. E., G. Gowing, and C. E. Kendal. 1996. Nest predation in Autralian urban environments and the role of the pied currawong, Strepera graculina. Australian J. Ecol. 21:399–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, R. E., and C. E. Kendal. 1996. The contribution of artificial nest experiments to understanding avian reproductive success: a review of methods and conclusions. Ibis 138:298–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, J. M., K. McGowan, R. Donnelly, and R. Knight. 2001. Causes and consequences of expanding American Crow populations, p. 333–365. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiae, P. E., and F. Stearns. 1981. Mammals in forest islands in southeastern Wisconsin, p. 55–66. In R.L. Burgess and D.M. Sharpe (EDS.), Forest island dynamics in man-dominated landscapes. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, K. 2001. Demographic and behavioral comparisons of suburban and rural American Crows, p. 367–383. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melampy, M. N., E. L. Kershner, and M. A. Jones. 1999. Nest predation in suburban and rural woodlots of northern Ohio. Am. Midland Nat. 141:284–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nupp, T. E., and R. K. Swihart. 1996. Effect of forest patch area on population attributes of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) in fragmented landscapes. Can. J. Zool. 74:467–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, T. 1997. Coyote (Canis latrans) food habits in three urban habitat types of western Washington. Northwest Sci. 71:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, S. P. D., J. Hadidain, and D. A. Manski. 1998. Population density, survival, and rabies in raccoons in an urban national park. Can. J. Zool. 76:1153–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper, J. J. 1992. Nest predation experiments with quail eggs: too much to swallow? Oikos 65:528–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rottenborn, S. C. 1999. Predicting the impacts of urbanization on riparian bird communities. Biol. Conserv. 88:289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savard, J., and J. B. Falls. 2001. Bird-habitat relationships of breeding birds in residential areas of Toronto, Canada, p. 543–568. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic. Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. A. 1999. Foraging theory as a conceptual framework for studying nest predation. Oikos 85:151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stallcup, R. 1991. A reversible catastrophe. Observer 91:8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J. 1989. Where have all the birds gone? Princeton University Press, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triggs, B., H. Brunner, and J. M. Cullen. 1984. The food of fox, dog, and cat in Croajingalong National Park, south-eastern Victoria. Australian Wildl. Res. 11:491–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trine, C. L. 1998. Wood thrush population sinks and implications for the scale of regional conservation strategies. Conserv. Biol. 12:576–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove, D. S. 1985. Nest predation in forest tracts and the decline of migratory songbirds. Ecology 66:1211–1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove, D. S. 1999. The condor’s shadow: The loss and recovery of wildlife in America. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, R. D. 1983. Identification of urban habitat components which affect eastern gray squirrel abundance. Urban Ecol. 7:345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, T. C. ML, N. S. Sodhi, and I. M. Turner. 1998. Artificial nest and seed predation experiments in tropical lowland rainforest remnants of Singapore. Biol. Conserv. 85:97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haskell, D.G., Knupp, A.M., Schneider, M.C. (2001). Nest predator abundance and urbanization. In: Marzluff, J.M., Bowman, R., Donnelly, R. (eds) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5600-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1531-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics