Skip to main content

Converting a Slip Table Random Vibration Test to a Fixed Base Modal Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Topics in Modal Analysis I, Volume 5

Abstract

Validation of finite element models using experimental data with unknown boundary conditions proves to be a significant obstacle. For this reason, the boundary conditions of an experiment are often limited to simple approximations such as free or mass loaded. This restriction means that vibration testing and modal analysis testing have typically required separate tests since vibration testing is often conducted on a shaker table with unknown boundary conditions. If modal parameters can be estimated while the test object is attached to a shaker table, it could eliminate the need for a separate modal test and result in a significant time and cost savings. This research focuses on a method to extract fixed base modal parameters for model validation from driven base experimental data. The feasibility of this method was studied on an Unholtz-Dickie T4000 shaker and slip table using a mock payload and compared with results from traditional modal analysis testing methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

\( a \) :

Acceleration

\( f \) :

Force

\( H \) :

Frequency response function

\( q \) :

Principal coordinates associated with \( \it \Psi \)

\( p \) :

Principal coordinates associated with \( \it \Upsilon \)

\( x \) :

Displacement

\( \phi \) :

Modal matrix

\( F \) :

Modal force

\( \it \Psi \) :

Mass normalized mode shape

\( R \) :

Reduction matrix

\( \it \Upsilon \) :

Constraint mode shapes

Superscripts:

 

\( + \) :

Pseudo-inverse

\( {\hbox{T}} \) :

Transpose

Subscripts:

 

\( f \) :

Degree of freedom at free location

\( c \) :

Degree of freedom at constraint location

\( fs \) :

Full system

\( diag \) :

Diagonal matrix

References

  1. Mayes RL, Allen MS (2011) Converting a driven base vibration test to a fixed base modal analysis. In: International modal analysis conference, Jacksonville

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen MS, Gindin HM, Mayes RL (2010) Experimental modal substructuring to extract fixed-base modes from a substructure attached to a flexible fixture. In: International modal analysis conference, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  3. Crowley JR, Klosterman AL, Rocklin GT, Vold H (1984) Direct structural modification using frequency response functions. In: International modal analysis conference, Orlando, pp 58–65

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mayes RL, Bridgers LD (2009) Extracting fixed base modal models from vibration tests on flexible tables. In: International modal analysis conference, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hensley DP, Mayes RL (2006) Extending SMAC to multiple references. In: International modal analysis conference, St. Louis, pp 220–230

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brandon R. Zwink .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1 Unconstrained Mode Shapes on Seismic Mass

Fig. A1.1
figure a_31

Rigid X on seismic

Fig. A1.2
figure b_31

Rigid Y on seismic

Fig. A1.3
figure c_31

Twist about Z on seismic

Fig. A1.4
figure d_31

Rigid Z on seismic

Fig. A1.5
figure e_31

Twist about Y on seismic

Fig. A1.6
figure f_31

Twist about X on seismic

Fig. A1.7
figure g_31

Elastic mode 1 on seismic

Fig. A1.8
figure h_31

Elastic mode 2 on seismic

Fig. A1.9
figure i_31

Elastic mode 3 on seismic

Fig. A1.10
figure j_31

Elastic mode 4 on seismic

Appendix 2 Unconstrained Mode Shapes on Shaker Table

Fig. A2.11
figure k_31

Rigid fore-aft on shaker table

Fig. A2.12
figure l_31

Lateral mode of shaker table

Fig. A2.13
figure m_31

Vertical mode of shaker table

Fig. A2.14
figure n_31

Elastic 1 on shaker table

Fig. A2.15
figure o_31

Elastic 2 on shaker table

Fig. A2.16
figure p_31

Elastic 3 on shaker table

Fig. A2.17
figure q_31

Elastic 4 on shaker table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2012

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zwink, B.R., Mayes, R.L., Kelton, D.W., Heister, J.D., Hunter, P.S., Gomez, A.J. (2012). Converting a Slip Table Random Vibration Test to a Fixed Base Modal Analysis. In: Allemang, R., De Clerck, J., Niezrecki, C., Blough, J. (eds) Topics in Modal Analysis I, Volume 5. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2425-3_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2425-3_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-2424-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-2425-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics