Skip to main content

In Defense of the American Party System

  • Chapter
Here the People Rule
  • 118 Accesses

Abstract

The American party system has been criticized on four main grounds: (1) the parties do not offer the electorate a choice in terms of fundamental principles; their platforms are very similar and mean next to nothing; (2)they cannot discipline those whom they elect, and therefore they cannot carry their platforms into effect; (3) they are held together and motivated less by political principle than by desire for personal, often material, gain, and by sectional and ethnic loyalties; consequently party politics is personal and parochial; and (4) their structure is such that they cannot correctly represent the opinion of the electorate; in much of the country there is in effect only one party, and everywhere large contrib-utors and special interests exercise undue influence within the party.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Political Parties, U.S.A., ed. Robert A. Goldwin (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1961), 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. E. Schattschneider, Party Government (New York: Farrar & Rinehart, 1942).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Defenses of the American party system include A. Lawrence Lowell, Essays on Government (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1889)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arthur N. Holcombe, The Political Parties of Today (New York: Harper, 1925)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pendleton Herring, The Politics of Democracy (New York: Norton, 1940)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Herbert Agar, The Price of Union (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henry Jones Ford, The Rise and Growth of American Politics (New York: Macmillan, 1990), 303.

    Google Scholar 

  8. André Siegfried, “Stable Instability in France,”Foreign Affairs, XXXIV (April 1956): 395.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Herbert Luethy, France against Herself (New York: Meridian Books, 1957), 61.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Willmoore Kendall, “The Two Majorities,” Midwest Journal of Political Science IV, no. 4 (November 1960), 317–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lucian W. Pye, “The Politics of Southeast Asia,” eds. G. Almond and J. Coleman, The Politics of the Developing Areas (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1969), 97.

    Google Scholar 

  12. William Graham Sumner, The Challenge of Facts (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1914), 271–72.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Robert Moses, La Guardia: A Salute and a Memoir (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1957), 37–38.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sir Henry Sumner Maine, Popular Government (New York: Henry Holt, 1886), 106–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Banfield, E.C. (1985). In Defense of the American Party System. In: Here the People Rule. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2481-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2481-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9504-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2481-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics