Skip to main content

Diagnostic Errors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Patient Safety in Surgery
  • 1679 Accesses

Abstract

The current rate of diagnostic error in modern medicine is about 10–15 %. Diagnostic error remains the most common reason for malpractice litigation, and it is the most costly category in this regard. Autopsy series suggest a significant rate of diagnostic error contributing to preventable patient mortality. While system errors may contribute to poor communication, the most common cause of diagnostic failure is a cognitive lapse or faulty reasoning on the part of the physician. This chapter considers the main theories explaining diagnostic reasoning and error. Armed with the knowledge of how diagnostic error commonly occurs, physicians may be in a better position to prevent error in the future. Various strategies to reduce diagnostic error are considered. The key to the reduction of diagnostic error may lie in the process of timely follow-up. This allows the diagnosis to be reconsidered, and it provides the physician with a more accurate understanding of his/her own diagnostic skills. With appropriate follow-up, alert physicians may detect error when it occurs, and they may alter their practice to prevent similar errors in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Friedman CP, Gatti GG, Franz TM, Murphy GC, Wolf FW, Heckerling PS, Fine PL, Miller TM, Elstein AS. Do physicians know when their diagnoses are correct? J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:334–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Harrison RV, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296(9):1094–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berner ES, Graber ML. Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. Am J Med. 2008;121 Suppl 5:S2–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shojania KG, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman L. Changes in autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA. 2003;289(21):2849–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bishop TF, Ryan AM, Casalino LP. Paid malpractice claims for adverse events in inpatient and outpatient settings. JAMA. 2011;305(23):2427–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Saber Tehrani AS, Lee H, Matthews SC, Shore A, Makery MA, Provnost PJ, Newman-Toker DE. 25-year summary of US malpractice claims for diagnostic errors 1986–2010: an analysis from the National Practitioner Data Bank. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(8):672–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Graber ML, Franklin N, Gordon R. Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(13):1493–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schiff GD, Hasan O, Kim S, Abrams R, Cosby K, Lambert BL, Elstein AS, Hasler S, Kabongo ML, Krosnjar N, Odwazny R, Wisniewski MF, McNutt RA. Diagnostic error in medicine: analysis of 583 physician-reported errors. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(20):1881–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zwaan L, de Bruijne M, Wagner C, Thijs A, Smits M, van der Wal G, Timmermans DR. Patient record review of the incidence, consequences, and causes of diagnostic adverse events. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(12):1015–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zwaan L, Thijs A, Wagner C, van der Wal G, Timmermans DR. Relating faults in diagnostic reasoning with diagnostic errors and patient harm. Acad Med. 2012;87(2):149–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Croskerry P. Clinical cognition and diagnostic error: applications of a dual process model of reasoning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009;14:27–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Norman G. Dual processing and diagnostic errors. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009;14:37–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rajkomar A, Dhaliwal G. Improving diagnostic reasoning to improve patient safety. Perm J. 2011;15(3):68–73.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Croskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad Med. 2003;78(8):775–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Croskerry P. Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decision making. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41(1):110–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bond WF, Schwartz LM, Weaver KR, Levick D, Giuliano M, Graber ML. Differential diagnosis generators: an evaluation of currently available computer programs. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;27(2):213–19.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Schiff GD. Minimizing diagnostic error: the importance of follow-up and feedback. Am J Med. 2008;121 Suppl 5:S38–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Redelmeier DA. The cognitive psychology of missed diagnoses. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:115–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ely JW, Graber ML, Croskerry P. Checklists to reduce diagnostic errors. Acad Med. 2011;86(3):307–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Mark Hammerberg MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hammerberg, E.M. (2014). Diagnostic Errors. In: Stahel, P., Mauffrey, C. (eds) Patient Safety in Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4369-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4369-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4368-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4369-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics