Skip to main content

The Contribution of the Dry Port Concept to the Extension of Port Life Cycles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Terminal Planning

Part of the book series: Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series ((ORCS,volume 49))

Abstract

Despite the temporary respite afforded by worldwide recession, limitations on port capacity still plague the container handling industry. At the same time, competitive pressures continue to mount on container ports. In recent years, the dry port concept has increasingly been applied, not only as a vehicle for overcoming capacity problems, but also as a deliberate attempt at expanding or reinforcing the hinterlands of container ports. The objective of this paper is to apply the Product Life Cycle to ports and to relate dry port development to the prolongation of the growth and/or maturity phases of a Port’s Life Cycle. In doing so, the dry port concept is explained by reference to both the literature and industry examples. The Product Life Cycle is then related specifically to container port development, and the prospect of dry ports exerting a positive impact on the Product Life Cycle of container ports is evaluated. The paper concludes by identifying the circumstances which are likely to characterize a successful implementation of the dry port concept, such that the desired effect of prolonging a port’s growth and/or maturity phases is achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alker S, Joy V, Roberts P, Smith N (2000) The definition of brownfield. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 43(1):49–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard B (2007) Freight transport coursework. Journal of Commerce (New York) April 30

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresford A (2009) Dry Ports: A Comparative Study of the UK and Nigeria. CYTICMS and Department of LMS of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Presentation at the International Forum on Shipping, Ports and Airports

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardebring PW,Warnecke C (1995) Combi-terminal and Intermodal Freight Centre Development. KFB Report (16), KFB-Swedish Transport and Communication Research Board, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn C (1981) Interstate system and capitalist world-economy: one logic or two? International Studies Quarterly 25(1):19–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen M, Fagerholt K, Ronen D (2004) Ship routing and scheduling: status and perspectives. Transportation Science 38:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordeau JF, Laporte G, Mercier A (2001) A unified tabu search heuristic for vehicle routing problems with time windows. Journal of the Operational Research Society 52:928–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane KPB (2000) The competitive position of the port of Hong Kong. The Journal of the Korean Association of Shipping Studies 31:45–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane KPB, Khanna M(1999) Economies of scale in large container ships. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 33(2):185–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane KPB, Khanna M (2000) Economies of scale in large containerships: optimal size and geographical implications. Journal of Transport Geography 8(3):181–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane KPB, Wang Y (2009) A capacity-based measure of container port accessibility. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications 12(2):103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane KPB, Cullinane SL, Kwan R (2000) Logistics decisions in Southern China: mode choice. Hong Kong Logistics 2:4–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane KPB, Wang TF, Cullinane SL (2004) Container terminal development in mainland China and its impact on the competitiveness of the port of Hong Kong. Transport Reviews 24(1):33–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi S (2003) European briefing: polycentricity in European spatial planning: from an analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies 11(8):979–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Errington A (1994) The peri-urban fringe: Europe’s forgotten rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies 10(4):367–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan Y, Cheung RK (2004) The berth allocation problem: models and solutions. OR Spectrum 26(1):75–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen P, Oguz C, Mladenevic N (2008) Variable neighborhood search for minimum cost berth allocation. European Journal of Operational Research 191(3):636–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison R (2008) International Trade, Transportation Corridors, and Inland Ports: Opportunities for Canada. Pacific-Asia Gateway and Corridor Research Consortium (ed), Online Publication: http://www.gateway-corridor.com/roundconfpapers/documents/Harrison_Robert_Winnipeg.pdf, 13 pp

  • HHLA [Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG] (2008) Expansion Plans in Film: Burchardkai Times Two. http://www.hhla.de/Expansion-plans.105.0.html?&no_cache=1&L=1, accessed September 12, 2010

  • Imai A, Nishimura E, Papadimitriou S (2001) The dynamic berth allocation problem for a container port. Transportation Research B 35(4):401–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai A, Nishimura E, Papadimitriou S, Liu M (2006) The economic viability of container mega-ships. Transportation Research E 42(1):21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarˇzemskis A, Vasiliauskas AV (2007) Research on dry port concept as intermodal node. Transport 2007 XXII(3):207–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim KH, Moon KC (2003) Berth scheduling by simulated annealing. Transportation Research B 37:541–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Klink HA, Van Den Berg G (1998) Gateways and intermodalism. Journal of Transport Geography 6(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P, Armstrong G (2004) Principles of Marketing, 10th edition. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • L¹evêeque P, Roso V (2002) Dry Port Concept for Seaport Inland Access with Intermodal Solutions. Masters Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Park YM, Kim KH (2003) A scheduling method for berth and quay cranes. OR Spectrum 25(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PoR [Port of Rotterdam] (2010) Maasvlakte 2. http://www.maasvlakte2.com/en/index/, accessed September 12, 2010

  • Reichart T (1999) Bausteine der Wirtschaftsgeographie. UTB, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigue JP (2006) Challenging the derived transport demand thesis: Issues in freight distribution. Environment & Planning A 38(8):1449–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roso V (2007) Evaluation of the dry port concept from an environmental perspective: a note. Transportation Research – Part D 12(7):523–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roso V, Woxenius J, Lumsden K (2008) The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland. Journal of Transport Geography 17(5):338–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rytköonen J (1999) The Risk of Maritime Traffic and Terminal Constructions in the Future. Presentation at the Joint Seminar on Ports and Maritime Environment in the Gulf of Finland (Espoo, Finland)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäatzl L (1996) Wirtschaftsgeographie 1 – Theorie, 6th edition. UTB, Paderborn

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper M (1997) The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift N (2004) Intensities of feeling: towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler – Series B 86(1):57–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD [United Nations Conference on Trade and Development] (ed) (1982) Multimodal Transport and Containerisation (TD/B/C.4/238/Supplement 1, Part Five: Ports and Container Depots). Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD [United Nations Conference on Trade and Development] (ed) (1991) Handbook on the Management and Operation of Dry Ports. Online Publication: http://unctad.org/en/docs/rdpldc7_en.pdf, Geneva, 93 pp

  • UNECE [United Nations Economic Commission for Europe] (ed) (1998) UN/LOCODE – Code for Ports and other Locations. Recommendation 16. Online Publication: http://www.unece.org/cefact/recommendations/rec16/rec16_ecetrd205e.pdf, Geneva, 9 pp

  • Vis IFA, Koster RD (2003) Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: an overview. European Journal of Operational Research 147(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Cullinane KPB (2008) Measuring container port accessibility: an application of the principal eigenvector method (pem). Maritime Economics and Logistics 10(1/2):75–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whebella CFJ (1969) Corridors: a theory of urban systems. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 59(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegmans B, Masurel E, Nijkamp P (1999) Intermodal freight terminals: an analysis of the terminal market. Transportation Planning and Technology 23:105–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yount KR (2003) What are brownfields? finding a conceptual definition. Environmental Practice 5(1):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Wan Y, Liu J, Linn RC (2002) Dynamic crane deployment in container storage yards. Transportation Research B 36(6):537–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Cullinane .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cullinane, K., Wilmsmeier, G. (2011). The Contribution of the Dry Port Concept to the Extension of Port Life Cycles. In: Böse, J. (eds) Handbook of Terminal Planning. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, vol 49. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8408-1_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics