Skip to main content
  • 105 Accesses

Abstract

Feminist literature has drawn attention to the lack of diverse voices in women’s research (Cook and Fonow, 1990; DeVault, 1990; Harding, 1991; Kaschak, 1992; Gorelick, 1996; Gottfried, 1996). This is especially true of the voices of women representing the diversity of color and class (Anzaldua, 1990; Bing and Reid, 1996; Collins, 1990; Reid, 1993; Reid and Kelly, 1994; Zinn et al., 1986). Even less represented in the literature are the implications of research conducted with groups who are marginalized from the dominant center of the inquiry process. In this chapter, we discuss two outcomes of a three-year project with women in transition seeking to become agents of change in their own lives. One of these outcomes was predicted; the other was total gift. The planned for outcome was the evolution of a collaborative methodology of adult education that grew organically out of our work with the community women and is based in theories of transformative learning, feminist post-structural pedagogy, and ecological dimensions of learning. Here we share three of the basic principles of our methodology, which foster what we describe as the development of an ecological consciousness. The second outcome, unforeseen, was the change experienced in the research team, itself. We will describe aspects of our own personal transformation as we sought to midwife change in others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anzaldua, G. (1990). Hacienda caras: Making face, Making Soul. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acker, J., Barry, K., and Esseveld, J. (1996). “Objectivity and Truth: Problems in Doing Feminist research.” In H. Gottfried (Ed.), Feminism and Social Change (pp. 60–87). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K., Armitage, S., Jack, D., and Wittner, J. (1990). “Beginning Where We Are.” In J. M. Nielsen (Ed.), Feminist Research Methods (pp. 94–112). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anzaldua, G. (1990). Hacienda caras: Making Face, Making Soul. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aptheker, B. (1989). Tapestries of Life: Women’s Work, Women’s Consciousness and the Meaning of Daily Experience. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bing, V. and Reid, P. T. (1996). “Unknown Women and Unknown Research: Consequences of Color and Class in Feminist Psychology.” In N. Goldberger, J. Tarule, B. Clinchy, and M. Belenky (Eds.), Knowledge, Difference and Power (pp. 175–202). New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookman, A. and Morgen, S. (Eds.) (1988). Women and the Politics of Empowerment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (2000). “Transformative Learning as Ideological Critique.” In J. Mezirow and Associates, Learning as Transformation (pp. 125–148). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. and Watkins, K. (1994). The Emerging Power of Action Inquiry Technologies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, J., Ettling, D., Jenett, D., and Shields, L. (1998). “Organic Research: Feminine Spirituality Meets Transpersonal Research.” In W Braud and R. Anderson (Eds.), Transpersonal Research Methods for the Social Sciences: Honoring Human Experience (pp. 114–127). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffman, P. M. (1989). Inclusive Language as a Means of Resisting Hegemony in Theological Education: a Phenomenology of Transformation and Empowerment of Persons in Adult Higher Education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1990). Black Feminist Thought. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. and Fonow, M. M. (1990). “Knowledge and Women’s Interests: Issues of Epistemology and Methodology in Feminist Sociological Research.” In J. M. Nielsen (Ed.), Feminist Research Methods (pp. 69–73). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. and Fonow, M. M. (Eds.) (1991). Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranton, P. (1994). Understanding and Promoting Transformative Learning: A Guide for Educators of Adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVault, M. (1990). “Talking and Listening from Women’s Standpoint: Feminist Strategies for Interviewing and Analysis.” Social Problems 37 (1), 96–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewane, C. M. (1993). Self Help Groups and Adult Learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettling, D. (2001). The Praxis of Sustaining Transformative Change. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettling, D. and Gozawa, J. (2000). “Morphogenic Fields: A Call for Radical Thinking and Being.” In K. Klenke (Ed.), 2000 Aom/IAom Proceedings Project 2005 18: 4 (pp. 61–71). Chesapeake: Maximilian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettling, D. and Thurston, M. (January 2001). Voices from the Margins. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Conference on Interdisciplinary Qualitative Studies, Athens, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M., Weis, L., Powell, L., and Wong, L. Mun. (1997). Off White. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberg, R. (1993). The Social Construction of Whiteness. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, M. M. (Ed.) (1988). Feminist Thought and the Structure of Knowledge. New York: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1993). In a Different Voice. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittell, M., Ortega-Bustamante, I., and Steffy, T. (1999). Women Creating Social Capital and Social Change. New York: Howard Samuels State Management and Policy Center, The University Center, The City University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger, N, Tarule, J., Clinchy, B., and Belenky, M. (1996). Knowledge, Difference and Power. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorelick, S. (1996). “Contradictions of Feminist Methodology.” In H. Gottfried (Ed.), Feminism and Social Change (pp. 23–45). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, H. (Ed.) (1996). Feminism and Social Change. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, B. (1994). “Diversity and Difference: Race and Feminist Psychotherapy.” In M. P. Mirkin (Ed.), Women in Context: Toward a Feminist Reconstruction of Psychotherapy (pp. 333–351). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. (1995). Feminisms and the Self The Web of Identity. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, E. (2000). “Social Contexts.” In E. Hayes and D. Flannery (Eds.), Women as Learners: The Significance of Gender in Learning (pp. 23–52). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, E. and Flannery, D. (2000). Women as Learners: The Significance of Gender in Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1993). Sisters of the Yam. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, A. (1996). The Color of Privilege. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J., Kaplan, A., Miller, J., Stiver, I., and Surrey, J. (1991). Women’s Growth in Connection. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaschak, E. (1992). Engendered Lives. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, C. (1991). Feminism and Psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1991). Getting Smart. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. and Associates. (2000). Learning as Transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mies, M. (1983). “Towards a Methodology for Feminist Research.” In G. Bowles and R. Klien (Eds.), Theories of Women’s Studies (pp. 60–84). Boston: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. B. (1986). Toward a New Psychology of Women. 2nd ed. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minh-ha, T. (1989). Woman, Native, Other. Indianopolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, N. (1985). The Journey is Home. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naples, N. (1998). Grassroots Warriors. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napels, N. and Clark, E. (1996). “Feminist Participatory Research and Empowerment: Going Public as Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse.” In H. Gottfried (Ed.), Feminism and Social Change (pp. 160–186). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, E. and O’Sullivan, E. (2002). “Transforming the Ecology of Violence: Ecology, War, Patriarchy, and the Institutionalization of Violence.” In E. O’Sullivan, A. Morrell, and M. A. O’Connor (Eds.), Expanding the Boundaries of Transformative Learning (pp. 173–184). New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sulllivan, E. (1999). Transformative Learning: Educational Vision for the 21st Century. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan E., Morrell, A., and O’Connor, M. A. (Eds.) (2002). Expanding the Boundaries of Transformative Learning. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poland, F. (1990). “Breaking the Rules: Assessing the Assessment of a Girls’ Project.” In L. Stanley (Ed.), Feminist Praxis (pp. 80–88). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, S. (1996). Wanting to be Something More:Transformation in Ethnically Diverse Working-Class Women Through the Process of Education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Los Angeles: Fielding Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, P. T. (1993). “Poor Women in Psychological Research.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 17, 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, P. T and Kelly, P. (1994). “Research on Women of Color: From Ignorance to Awareness.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 18, 377–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribbens, J. and Edwards, R. (Eds.) (1998). Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromstead, T. (2001). “Re-inhabiting the Female Body: Authentic Movement as a Gateway to Transformation.” The Arts in Psychotherapy 28, 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. (1998). The Theory and Practice of Transformative Learning: A Critical Review. Information Series, 374 Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult Career and Vocational Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. (2000). “Analyzing Research on Transformative Learning Theory.” In J. Mezirow and Associates, Learning as Transformation (pp. 285–328). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, K. and Marienau, C. (1995). Learning Environments for Women’s Adult Development: Bridges Toward Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant, M. and Pogson, P. (1995). Learning and Change in Adult Years. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. (2000). Women, Class and Education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell, E. J. (2000). “Feminist Pedagogies.” In E. Hayes and D. Flannery (Eds.), Women as Learners: The Significance of Gender in Adult Learning (pp. 155–183). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, E. and Padilla, M. (1990). “Mujeres unidas en acion: A Popular Education Process.” Harvard Educational Review 60 (1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, M., Baca, J., Cannon, L. W., Higginbotham, E., and Dill, B. (1986). “The Cost of Exclusionary Practices in Women’s Studies.” Signs: Journal of Women and Culture in Society 11, 290–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Edmund V. O’Sullivan Marilyn M. Taylor

Copyright information

© 2004 Edmund V. O’Sullivan and Marilyn M. Taylor

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ettling, D., Guilian, L. (2004). Midwifing Transformative Change. In: O’Sullivan, E.V., Taylor, M.M. (eds) Learning Toward an Ecological Consciousness: Selected Transformative Practices. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-8238-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics