Abstract
The popular hypothesis of increasing Retums in the new growth theory has an implication which has been inevitably related to population. The assumption of ‘learning by doing’, almost by definition, implies that productivity growth is an increasing function of the aggregate production activity, which in turn might be affected by the size of population. One version of the ‘human capital’ approach to growth assumes that the external effect in production depends on the total stock of human capital, which in turn leads to a positive relationship between population and technological growth. A third approach to modelling increasing Retums is to emphasize the ‘non-rivalry’ factor, normally referred to as ‘knowledge’, in the production technology. Some researchers (such as Romer, 1990) concentrate on the public accessibility of knowledge when it is used; others (such as Arrow, 1962) show that the per capita cost of creating knowledge is inversely related to the population size. In either case, a larger population size can support more publicly accessible knowledge, which is another kind of connection between technological growth and population.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arrow, K.J. (1962), ‘The Economic Implications of Leaming-by-Doing’, Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155–73.
Backus, D.K., Kehoe, P.J. and Kehoe, T.J. (1992), ‘In Search of Scale Effect in Trade and Growth’, Journal of Economic Theory, 58, 377–409.
Barro, R.J. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995), Economic Growth (New York: McGraw-Hill).
Boserup, E. (1965), The Conditions of Agricultural Progress (London: Allen & Urwin).
Boserup, E. (1981), Population and Technological Change (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press).
Goodfriend, M. and McDermott, J. (1995), ‘Early Development’, American Economic Review, 85, 116–33.
Ethier, W.J. (1982), ‘National and International Retums to Scale in the Modern Theory of International Trade’, American Economic Review, 72, 389–405.
Jones, E.L and Woolf, S.J. (1969), Agrarian Change and Economic Development (London: Methuen).
Kremer, M. (1993), ‘Population Growth and Technological Change: One Million BC to 1990’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 681–716.
Lee, R.D. (1986), ‘Malthus and Boserup: A Dynamic Synthesis’, in D. Coleman and D. Schofield (eds), The State of Population Theory: Forward from Malthus (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), 96–130.
Lee, R.D. (1988), ‘Induced Population Growth and Induced Technological Progress: Their Interaction in the Acceleration Stage’, Mathematical Population Studies, 1, 265–88.
Pryor, F.L. and Maurer, S.B. (1982), ‘On Induced Economic Change in Precapitalist Society’, Journal of Development Economics, 10, 325–53.
Romer, P.M. (1990), ‘Endogenous Technological Change’, Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71–S102.
Romer, P.M. (1994), ‘The Origin of Endogenous Growth’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 3–22.
Yang, X. and Borland, J. (1991), ‘A Microeconomic Mechanism for Economic Growth’, Journal of Political Economy, 99, 460–82.
Yang, X. and Ng, Y.-K. (1993), Specialization and Economic Organization: A New Classical Microeconomic Framework (Amsterdam: North-Holland).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chu, C.Y.C., Tsai, YC. (1998). Productivity, Investment in Infrastructure and Population Size: Formalizing the Theory of Ester Boserup. In: Arrow, K.J., Ng, YK., Yang, X. (eds) Increasing Returns and Economic Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26255-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26255-7_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-26257-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-26255-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)