Abstract
We cannot take for granted our ability to appropriate the word ‘transcendence’ in our common discourse, if only because we may not have a common discourse for this concept. Words may slide, slip and lose their hold, so that a time may come when it is better to let them go lest further damage is caused. There is an irony in a situation in which intellectuals think of themselves as the guardians of sense. What if the perilous state of the concept of transcendence has to do, in part, at least, with what we, as intellectuals, have made of it? It is not my intention, in this introduction, to answer that question one way or another, but one cannot read the papers in this collection without being confronted by it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1997 The Claremont Graduate School
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Phillips, D.Z. (1997). Introduction: Appropriating ‘Transcendence’. In: Phillips, D.Z., Tessin, T. (eds) Religion without Transcendence?. Claremont Studies in the Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25915-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25915-1_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-25917-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-25915-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)