Skip to main content

Existence and Predication

  • Chapter
The Ontological Argument

Part of the book series: New Studies in the Philosophy of Religion ((NSPR))

  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

Very many philosophers have thought that the Ontological Argument collapses because ‘Existence is not a Predicate’ (e.g. Ayer, Broad, Wisdom, in Plantinga [3] p. 38). The most celebrated supporter of this view is Kant (pp. 504–7), but it is found briefly stated in Gassendi’s criticism of Descartes’ argument (II 186); and the slogan, ‘Existence is not a Predicate’, has a venerable history in its own right (cf. Rescher [3] pp. 79–80).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1972 Jonathan Barnes

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barnes, J. (1972). Existence and Predication. In: The Ontological Argument. New Studies in the Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00773-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics