Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Biochar insights from laboratory incubations monitoring O2 consumption and CO2 production

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biochar Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biochar has been touted as a long-term carbon sequestration tool. However, there are no studies evaluating biochar’s effect on oxygen (O2) consumption as a measure of the microbial respiration response to biochar. To gain insight into this aspect, we evaluated O2 consumption rates to test the hypothesis that biochar is an efficient agent for carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration in soils. Four different biochar types and one activated charcoal were incubated alone and associated with three different soils for approximately 2 months in laboratory incubations. Headspace concentration of CO2 and O2 was periodically quantified. The data presented here confirm that the CO2 production following biochar’s addition to soils results in a process that is correlated to oxygen consumption. However, this overall stimulation is not clearly related to biochar type. Activated carbon resulted in the highest statistically significant stimulation of activity, despite it possessing the lowest quantity of volatile carbon and mineral nutrient sources. Taking into consideration our results, we conclude that using biochar does achieve total carbon sequestration. However, the amount of available soil organic carbon following soil incorporation appears to be reduced following biochar addition and its long-term implication on this mineralizable soil organic carbon pool does deserve more research attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agegnehu G, Bass AM, Nelson PN, Muirhead B, Wright G, Bird MI (2015) Biochar and biochar-compost as soil amendments: effects on peanut yield, soil properties and greenhouse gas emissions in tropical North Queensland, Australia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 213:72–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida RF, Silveira CH, Mota RP, Moitinho M, Arruda EM, Mendonça ES, La Scala N, Wendling B (2015) For how long does the quality and quantity of residues in the soil affect the carbon compartments and CO2–C emissions? J Soils Sediments 16:2354–2365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida RF, Teixeira DB, Montanari R, Bolonhezi AC, Teixeira EB, Moitinho MR, Panosso AR, Spokas KA, La Scala Júnior N (2018) Ratio of CO2 and O2 as an index for categorising soil biological activity in sugarcane areas under contrasting straw management regimes. Soil Res 56:373–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Angert A, Yakir D, Rodeghiero M, Preisler Y, Davidson EA, Weiner T (2015) Using O2 to study the relationships between soil CO2 efflux and soil respiration. Biogeosciences 12:2089–2099

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Chen G, Chen L, Chen Y, Lehmann J, Mcbride MB, Hay AG (2011) Adsorption of copper and zinc by biochars produced from pyrolysis of hardwood and corn straw in aqueous solution. Bioresour Technol 102:8877–8884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng CH, Lehmann JE, Thies SD, Burton Engelhard MH (2006) Oxidation of black carbon by biotic and abiotic processes. Org Geochem 37:1477–1488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Creamer AE, Gao B, Zhang M (2014) Carbon dioxide capture using biochar produced from sugarcane bagasse and hickory wood. Chem Eng J 249:174–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EA, Janssens IA (2006) Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440:165–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster DN, Gleeson DB, Solaiman ZM, Jones DL, Murphy DV (2012) Decreased soil microbial biomass and nitrogen mineralisation with eucalyptus biochar addition to a coarse textured soil. Plant Soil 354:311–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ESRL: Earth System Research Laboratory (2016) Global monitoring division. Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Available via DIALOG http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/weekly.html. Accessed 22 Feb 2019

  • FAO: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2010) Challenges and opportunities for carbon sequestration in grassland systems: a technical report on grassland management and climate change mitigation. Integrated Crop Management, vol 9–2010. Available via DIALOG http://www.fao.org/3/a-i1399e.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2019

  • Fearnside PM, Barbosa RI (1998) Soil carbon changes from conversion of forest to pasture in Brazilian Amazonia. For Ecol Manag 108:147–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fidel RB, Laird DA, Parkin TB (2019) Effect of biochar on soil greenhouse gas emissions at the laboratory and field scales. Soil Syst 3:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa JD, Fout T, Plasynski S, Mcilvried Srivastava RD (2008) Advances in CO2 capture technology—the US Department of Energy’s Carbon Sequestration Program. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2:9–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fungo B, Lehmann J, Kalbitz K, Thionģo M, Tenywa M, Okeyo I, Neufeldt H (2019) Ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions from a field ultisol amended with tithonia green manure, urea, and biochar. Biol Fertil Soils 55:135–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • García-Jaramilloa M, Coxa L, Knicker HE, Cornejoa J, Spokas KA, Hermosína MA (2015) Characterization and selection of biochar for an efficient retention of tricyclazole in a flooded alluvial paddy soil. J Hazard Mater 285:581–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo LB, Gifford RM (2002) Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol 8:345–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo T, Ma N, Pan Y, Bedane AH, Xiao H, Eić M, Du Y (2018) Characteristics of CO2 adsorption on biochar derived from biomass pyrolysis in molten salt. Can J Chem Eng 96:2352–2360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Kua HW (2017) Factors determining the potential of biochar as a carbon capturing and sequestering construction material: critical review. J Mater Civ Eng 29:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Han G, Lan J, Chen Q, Yu C, Bie S (2017) Response of soil microbial community to application of biochar in cotton soils with different continuous cropping years. Sci Rep 7:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang L, Liu J, Shao Q, Xu X (2012) Carbon sequestration by forestation across China: past, present, and future. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:1291–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inyang M, Gao B, Pullammanappallil P, Ding WC, Zimmerman AR (2010) Biochar from anaerobically digested sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 101:8868–8872

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karhu K, Mattil T, Bergström I, Regina K (2011) Biochar addition to agricultural soil increased CH4 uptake and water holding capacity—results from a short-term pilot field study. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140:309–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keiluweit M, Nico PS, Johnson MG, Kleber M (2010) Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44:1247–1253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kyaw Tha Paw U, Xu L, Ideris AJ, Kochendorfer J, Wharton S, Rolston DE, Hsiao TC (2006) Title of subordinate document: Simultaneous carbon dioxide and oxygen measurements to improve soil efflux estimates. Kearney Foundation of Soil Science: soil carbon and California’s terrestrial ecosystems. (Final Report, 2004211, 1/1/2005–12/31/2006). Available via DIALOG http://kearney.ucdavis.edu/OLD%20MISSION/2004_Final_Reports/2004211PawU_FINALkms.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2019

  • Laird D, Brown RC, Amonette JE, Lehmann J (2009) Review of the pyrolysis platform for coproducing bio-oil and biochar. Biofuel Bioprod Biorefin 3:547–562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laird D, Fleming P, Wang B, Horton R, Karien D (2010) Biochar impact on nutrient leaching from a Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 185:436–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J (2007) A handful of carbon. Nature 447:143–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota—a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1812–1836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lentz RD, Ippolito JA, Spokas KA (2014) Biochar and manure effects on net nitrogen mineralization and greenhouse gas emissions from calcareous soil under corn. Soil Sci Soc Am J 78:1641–1655

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lim TJ, Spokas KA, Feyereisen G, Novak JM (2016) Predicting the impact of biochar additions on soil hydraulic properties. Chemosphere 142:136–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linn DM, Doran JW (1984) Effect of water-filled pore space on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide production in tilled and no-tilled soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:1267–1272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melillo JM, Steudler PA, Aber JD, Newkirk K, Lux H, Bowles FP, Catricala C, Magill A, Ahrens T, Morrisseau S (2002) Soil warming and carbon-cycle feedbacks to the climate system. Science 298:2173–2176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novak JM, Cantrell KB, Watts DW (2013) Compositional and thermal evaluation of lignocellulosic and poultry litter chars via high and low temperature pyrolysis. Bioenergy Res 6:114–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nuithitikul K, Srikhun S, Hirunpraditkoon S (2010) Influences of pyrolysis condition and acid treatment on properties of durian peel-based activated carbon. Bioresour Technol 101:426–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petzoldt T (2018) Title of subordinate document: Growth rates: Estimate Growth Rates from Experimental Data. R package version 0.7.2. Available via DIALOG https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=growthrates. Accessed 22 Feb 2019

  • Pietikainen J, Kiikkila O, Fritze H (2000) Charcoal as a habitat for microbes and its effect on the microbial community of the underlying humus. Oikos 89:231–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plaza M, González A, Pis J, Rubiera F, Pevida C (2014) Production of microporous biochars by single-step oxidation: effect of activation conditions on CO2 capture. Appl Energy 114:551–562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2019) Title of subordinate document: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available via DIALOG https://www.R-project.org. Accessed 22 Feb 2019

  • Rashidi NA, Yusup S (2017) Potential of palm kernel shell as activated carbon precursors through single stage activation technique for carbon dioxide adsorption. J Clean Prod 168:474–486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheer C, Grace PR, Rowlings DW, Kimber S, Van Zwieten L (2011) Effect of biochar amendment on the soil atmosphere exchange of greenhouse gases from an intensive subtropical pasture in northern New South Wales, Australia. Plant Soil 345:47–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Serafin J, Narkiewicz U, Morawski AW, Wróbel RJ, Michalkiewicz B (2017) Highly microporous activated carbons from biomass for CO2 capture and effective micropores at different conditions. J CO2 Util 18:73–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Zhu L, Cheng H, Yue S, Li S (2017) Effects of biochar application on CO2 emissions from a cultivated soil under semiarid climate conditions in northwest china. Sustainability 9:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigua GC, Novak JM, Watts DW, Cantrell KB, Shumaker PD, Szögi AA, Johnson MG (2014) Carbon mineralization in two ultisols amended with different sources and particle sizes of pyrolyzed biochar. Chemosphere 103:313–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smagin AV, Dolgikhb AV, Karelin DV (2016) Experimental studies and physically substantiated model of carbon dioxide emission from the exposed cultural layer of Veliky Novgorod. Eurasian Soil Sci 49:450–456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spokas KA (2010) Review of the stability of biochar in soils: predictability of O:C molar ratios. Carbon Manag 1:289–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spokas KA (2013) Impact of biochar field aging on laboratory greenhouse gas production potentials. GCB Bioenergy 5:165–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spokas KA, Reicosky DC (2009) Impacts of sixteen different biochar son soil greenhouse gas production. Ann Environ Sci 3:179–193

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spokas KA, Novak JM, Masiello CA, Johnson MG, Colosky EC, Ippolito JA, Trigo C (2014) Physical disintegration of biochar: an overlooked process. Environ Sci Technol Lett 1:326–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Wang S (2019) Preparation, modification and environmental application of biochar: a review. J Clean Prod 227:1002–1022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weldon S, Rasse DP, Budai A, Tomic O, Dörsch P (2019) The effect of a biochar temperature series on denitrification: which biochar properties matter? Soil Biol Biochem 135:173–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yargicoglu EN, Sadasivam BY, Reddy KR, Spokas K (2015) Physical and chemical characterization of waste wood derived biochars. Waste Manag 36:256–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu XY, Pan LG, Ying GG, Kookana RS (2010) Enhanced and irreversible sorption of pesticide pyrimethanil by soil amended with biochars. J Environ Sci 22:615–620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan JH, Xu RK, Zhang H (2011) The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresour Technol 102:3488–3497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oo AZ, Shigeto S, Akiyama H, Win KT, Shibata A, Yamamoto A, Sano T, Hirono Y (2018) Effect of dolomite and biochar addition on N2O and CO2 emissions from acidic tea field soil. PLoS One 13:1–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang CM, Song W, Sun GH, Xie LJ, Wang JL, Li KX, Sun CG, Liu H, Snape CE, Drage T (2013) CO2 capture with activated carbon grafted by nitrogenous functional groups. Energy Fuels 27:4818–4823

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Zhang S, Yang H, Shao J, Chen Y, Liao X, Wang X, Chen H (2017) Generalized two-dimensional correlation infrared spectroscopy to reveal mechanisms of CO2 capture in nitrogen enriched biochar. Proc Combust Inst 36:3933–3940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of São Paulo-USP, Piracicaba, Brazil

    Risely Ferraz Almeida

  2. United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, St. Paul, MN, USA

    Kurt A. Spokas

  3. University of Marília-Unimar, Marília, Brazil

    Daniel de Bortoli Teixeira

  4. Universidade Estadual Paulista-UNESP, Jaboticabal, Brazil

    Newton La Scala Júnior

Authors
  1. Risely Ferraz Almeida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kurt A. Spokas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel de Bortoli Teixeira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Newton La Scala Júnior
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Risely Ferraz Almeida.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 116 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Almeida, R.F., Spokas, K.A., de Bortoli Teixeira, D. et al. Biochar insights from laboratory incubations monitoring O2 consumption and CO2 production. Biochar 1, 249–258 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-019-00021-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-019-00021-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation