Skip to main content
Log in

Flotation in Seawater

  • Review
  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A classification of flotation processes carried out in concentrated electrolyte solutions, e.g., seawater, is proposed using the most obvious features of these processes: low or high content of Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions, pulp ionic strength, and pH. The first distinguishable group is the processes carried out in NaCl/KCl solutions, about 0.5 M in the case of salt flotation of inherently hydrophobic minerals, and at concentrations about 10 times higher in the flotation of potash ores. In the flotation of sulfide ores, such as nickel or copper ores, with xanthate-like collectors, the xanthate collector is apparently not affected by pulp ionic strength and only adjustment of frother may be required. Content of Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions in seawater is the main difference between such systems and fresh water. The presence of these metallic ions can adversely affect flotation in the pH ranges over which these ions hydrolyse. The successful flotation of Cu-Mo ores typically requires depression of pyrite at high pH values achieved with the use of lime. However, in seawater, flotation of Cu-Mo ores requires removal of the hydrolysis products of the Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions or the use of a pyrite depressant that can be effective over the pH ranges that are much below the pH of hydrolysis. Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions also affect flotation of phosphate ores with fatty acids. In this case, the depression mechanism is not caused by precipitating magnesium hydroxides on the mineral surface but by precipitation of collector insoluble salts, and the same ions are responsible for depression in both cases. In the seawater flotation of Cu-Mo sulfide ores and phosphate ores, the practical solution involves either removal of Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions prior to the flotation or complexation with other reagents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Castro S (2010) Chilean Patent, No 00475/INAPI

  2. Castro S (2012) Challenges in flotation of Cu-Mo sulfide ores in seawater. Water in Mineral Processing (J. Drelich, ed.), SME, pp. 29–40

  3. Castro S, Miranda C, Toledo P, Laskowski JS (2013) Effect of frothers on bubble coalescence and foaming in electrolyte solutions and seawater. Int J Miner Process 124:8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Castro S, Uribe L, Laskowski JS (2014) Depression of inherently hydrophobic minerals by hydrolysable metal cations: molybdenite depression in seawater. In Proc. 27th Int. Mineral Process, Congress, Santiago, pp. 207–217

  5. Cho YS, Laskowski JS (2002) Effect of flotation frothers on bubble size and foam stability. Int J Miner Process 64:69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cho YS, Laskowski JS (2002) Bubble coalescence and its effect on dynamic foam stability. Can J Chem Eng 80:299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Corin K, Reddy A, Miyen L, Wiese J, Harris P (2010) The effect of ionic strength of plant water on valuable mineral and gangue recovery in a platinum bearing ore from the Merensky Reef. In Proc. 25th Int. Mineral Processing Congress, Brisbane, pp. 1807–1814

  8. Fuerstenau DW, Rosenbaum JM, Laskowski JS (1983) Effect of surface functional groups on the flotation of coal. Coll. Surf. 8:153–160

  9. Fuerstenau MC, Palmer BR (1976) Anionic flotation of oxides and silicates. In FLOTATION - AM Gaudin Memorial Volume (MC Fuerstenau, ed), SME, Vol. 1, pp. 148–196

  10. Gleick PH (1996) Water resources. In: Schneider SH (ed) Encyclopedia of climate and weather, vol 2. Oxford University press, New York, pp 817–823

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gorain BK, Jiang J, Mitchell J, Kondos P (2016) The AMBS flotation process for copper and copper-gold ores; bench to plant applications. In Proc. 28th Int. Mineral Processing Congress, Quebec City, Paper 769

  12. Hamilton IC, Woods R (1986) Surfactant properties of alkyl xanthates. Int J Miner Process 17:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. James RO, Healy TW (1972) Adsorption of hydrolysable metal ions at the oxide-water interface. J Colloid Interface Sci 40:42–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Klassen VI (1963) Coal flotation, Gosgortiekhizdat, Moscow (Russian text)

  15. Klassen VI, Mokrousov VA (1963) An introduction to the theory of flotation. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Laskowski JS, Kitchener JA (1969) The hydrophobic-hydrophilic transition on silica. J Colloid Interface Sci 29:670–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Laskowski JS, Iskra J (1970) Role of capillary effects in bubble-particle collision in flotation. Trans. IMM, Section C 79 : C6-C10

  18. Laskowski JS, Xu Z, Yoon RH (1991) Energy barrier in particle-bubble attachment and its effect on flotation kinetics. In Proc. 17th Int. Mineral Processing Congress, Dresden, Vol. 2, pp. 237–249

  19. Laskowski JS, Pawlik M, Ansari A (2007) Effect of brine concentration on the Krafft point of log chain amines. Can Metall Q 46:295–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Laskowski JS (2013) From amine molecules adsorption to amine precipitate transport by bubbles: a potash ore flotation mechanism. Miner Eng 45:170–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Leja J (1982) Surface chemistry of froth flotation, Plenum Press

  22. Lekki J (1970) Use pf plant water in flotation of copper sulfide ores from Lubin and Polkowice mines in the light of the tests on sodium chloride - α-terpineol - xanthae system. Ph.D. Thesis, Silesian University of Technology. Gliwice, Poland

  23. Li H, Zhou A, Xu Z, Masliah JH (2005) Role of acidified sodium silicate in low temperature bitumen extraction from poor-processing oil sand ores. Ind Eng Chem Res 44:4753–4761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lopez-Valdivieso A, Montejano Castillo L, Lopez Miranda A, Alvarado Gomez E (2013) Effect of magnesium and calcium ions on the floatability of apatite at sea water ionic strength using carboxylic type collectors. In COM2013 Conference, Montreal, October 27-31, 2013

  25. Nanthakumar B, Grimm D, Pawlik M (2009) Anionic flotation of high-iron phosphate ores – control of process water chemistry and depression of iron minerals by starch and guar gum. Int J Miner Process 92:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Poling GW (1976) Reactions between thiol reagents and sulphide minerals. In FLOTATION – AM Gaudin Memorial Volume (MC Fuerstenau, ed), SME, Vol. 1, pp. 334–363

  27. Quinn JJ, Kracht W, Gomez CO, Gagnon C, Finch JA (2007) Comparing the effect of salts and frother (MIBC) on gas dispersions and froth properties. Miner Eng 20:1296–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rebolledo E, Laskowski JS, Gutierrez L, Castro S (2017) Use of dispersants in flotation of molybdenite in seawater. Miner Eng 100:71–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Traube J (1926) Attraction intensity or attraction pressure. Colloid Chemistry (J Alexander, Ed), Chemical Catalog Co, Vol. 1, pp. 640–646

  30. Yousef AA, Arafa MA, Ibrahim SS, Abdel Khalek MA (2003) Seawater usage in flotation for minerals beneficiation in arid regions (Arab countries). In Proc. 22nd Int. Mineral Processing Congress, Cape Town, Vol. 2, pp. 1023–1033

Download references

Funding

This study received financial support from CRHIAM provided via CONICYT/FONDAP-15130015 project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. S. Laskowski.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laskowski, J.S., Castro, S. & Gutierrez, L. Flotation in Seawater. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 36, 89–98 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-018-0018-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-018-0018-6

Keywords

Navigation