Skip to main content
Log in

Mechatronic Design of a Synergetic Upper Limb Exoskeletal Robot and Wrench-based Assistive Control

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Upper limb exoskeletal rehabilitation robots are required to assist patients’ arms to perform activities of daily living according to their motion intentions. In this paper, we address two questions: how to design an exoskeletal robot which can mechanically reconstruct functional movements using only a few actuators and how to establish wrench-based assistive control. We first show that the mechanism replicating the synergic feature of the human upper limb can be designed in a recursive manner, meaning that the entire robot can be constructed from two basic mechanical units. Next, we illustrate that the assistive control for the synergetic exoskeletal robot can be transformed into an optimization problem and a Riemannian metric is proposed to generate anthropomorphic reaching movements according to contact forces and torques. Finally, experiments are carried out to verify the functionality of the proposed theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Riener R, Nef T, Colombo G. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 2005, 43, 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kwakkel G, Kollen B J, Krebs H I. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2008, 22, 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hubbard I J, Parsons M W, Neilson C, Carey L M. Task-specific training: Evidence for and translation to clinical practice. Occupational Therapy International, 2009, 16, 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bayona N A, Bitensky J, Salter K, Teasell R. The role of task-specific training in rehabilitation therapies. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 2005, 12, 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jarrasse N, Proietti T, Crocher V, Robertson J, Sahbani A, Morel G, Roby-Brami A. Robotic exoskeletons: A perspective for the rehabilitation of arm coordination in stroke patients. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2014, 8, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Maciejasz P, Eschweiler J, Gerlach-Hahn K, Jansen-Troy A, Leonhardt S. A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 2014, 11, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hogan N, Krebs H I, Charnnarong J, Srikrishna P, Sharon A. MIT-MANUS: A workstation for manual therapy and training. I. Proceedings IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, Tokyo, Japan, 1992, 161–165.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Lum P S, Burgar C G, Van der Loos M, Shor P C, Majmundar M, Yap R. MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 2006, 43, 631–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Loureiro R, Amirabdollahian F, Topping M, Driessen B, Harwin W. Upper limb robot mediated stroke therapy- GENTLE/s approach. Autonomous Robots, 2003, 15, 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nef T, Guidali M, and Riener R, ARMin III–arm therapy exoskeleton with an ergonomic shoulder actuation. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 2009, 6, 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Keller U, van Hedel H J A, Verena K M, Riener R. ChARMin: The first actuated exoskeleton robot for pediatric arm rehabilitation. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2016, 21, 2201–2213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim B, Deshpande A D. An upper-body rehabilitation exoskeleton Harmony with an anatomical shoulder mechanism: Design, modeling, control, and performance evaluation. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2017, 36, 414–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Perry J C, Rosen J, Bums S. Upper-limb powered exoskeleton design. IEEE-ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2007, 12, 408–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gopura R A R C, Kiguchi K, Li Y. SUEFUL-7: A 7DOF upper-limb exoskeleton robot with muscle-model-oriented EMG-based control. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, St. Louis, MO, USA, 2009, 1126–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Carignan C, Tang J, Roderick S. Development of an exoskeleton haptic interface for virtual task training. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, St. Louis, MO, USA, 2009, 3697–3702.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Otten A, Voort C, Stienen A, Aarts R, van Asseldonk E, van der Kooij H. LIMPACT: A hydraulically powered self-aligning upper limb exoskeleton. IEEE-ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2015, 20, 2285–2298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanger T D. Human arm movements described by a low-dimensional superposition of principal components. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2000, 20, 1066–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Santello M, Flanders M, Soechting J F. Postural hand synergies for tool use. Journal of Neuroscience, 1998, 18, 10105–10115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vidal R, Ma Y, Sastry S S. Generalized Principal Component Analysis, 1st ed, Springer, New York, USA, 2016.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Artemiadis P K, Kyriakopoulos K J. EMG-based control of a robot arm using low-dimensional embeddings. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2010, 26, 393–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Santello M, Bianchi M, Gabiccini M, Ricciardi E, Salvietti G, Prattichizzo D, Ernst M, Moscatelli A, Jorntell H, Kappers A M L, Kyriakopoulos K, Albu-Schaeffer A, Castellini C, Bicchi A. Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands. Physics of Life Reviews, 2016, 17, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xiong C H, Chen W R, Sun B Y, Liu M J, Yue S G, Chen W B. Design and implementation of an anthropomorphic hand for replicating human grasping functions. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2016, 32, 652–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim S, Park F C. Fast robot motion generation using principal components: Framework and algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2008, 55, 2506–2516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Magermans D, Chadwick E, Veeger H, Van Der Helm F. Requirements for upper extremity motions during activities of daily living. Clinical Biomechanics, 2005, 20, 591–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. van Andel C J, Wolterbeek N, Doorenbosch C A, Veeger D H, Harlaar J. Complete 3D kinematics of upper extremity functional tasks. Gait & Posture, 2008, 27, 120–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen W, Xiong C, Huang X, Sun R, Xiong Y. Kinematic analysis and dexterity evaluation of upper extremity in activities of daily living. Gait & Posture, 2010, 32, 475–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Coscia M, Cheung V C, Tropea P, Koenig A, Monaco V, Bennis C, Micera S, Bonato P. The effect of arm weight support on upper limb muscle synergies during reaching movements. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 2014, 11, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Davies P M. Steps to Follow: The Comprehensive Treatment of Patients with Hemiplegia, 2nd ed, Springer Science & Business Media, New York, USA, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Koshland G F, Galloway J C, Nevoret-Bell C J. Control of the wrist in three-joint arm movements to multiple directions in the horizontal plane. Journal of Neurophysiology, 2000, 83, 3188–3195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Brown C Y, Asada H H. Inter-finger coordination and postural synergies in robot hands via mechanical implementation of principal components analysis. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Diego, CA, USA, 2007, 2877–2882.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chen W, Xiong C, Yue S. Mechanical implementation of kinematic synergy for continual grasping generation of anthropomorphic hand. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2015, 20, 1249–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Murray R M, Li Z, Sastry S S, Sastry S S. A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation, CRC press, Florida, USA, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu Q C, Wang X S, Chen L, Du F P. Transmission model and compensation control of double-tendon-sheath actuation system. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2015, 62, 1599–1609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 91648203 and 51335004), the International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFE0113600), and the Science Foundation for Innovative Group of Hubei Province (Grant No. 2015CFA004).

The authors would like to thank Ting Wang, Xiaowei Cheng, and Xuan Wu for their contributions to the development of the experimental platform.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caihua Xiong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, L., Xiong, C., Liu, K. et al. Mechatronic Design of a Synergetic Upper Limb Exoskeletal Robot and Wrench-based Assistive Control. J Bionic Eng 15, 247–259 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-018-0019-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-018-0019-7

Keywords

Navigation