Abstract
India’s cultural diversity is an illustration of sustainable engagement of people with their environment where cultural practices are in a delicate ecological balance often with meagre resources and harsh conditions. This balance is underestimated when programmes and services seek inspiration and guidance from global trends without adequate attention to local reality. Poverty is treated as a failure of the people (and by the people as a failure of the Government) rather than a consequence of long-standing structural marginalization. Blaming the victim has been an important theme in evaluating cultural practices of people living with disadvantage. This is a serious error in judgement both on scientific and ethical grounds. Despite enduring scholarly work that recognizes the need for context-sensitive theory and research in the field of psychology, institutional practices have remained largely loyal to global trends. Large-scale intervention programmes in community welfare persist with practices that derive directly from mainstream psychology, especially in the fields of education, family studies and child development. Through the financial and ideological push from international NGOs that prescribe objectives and strategies for intervention, the real problem remains ignored despite claiming impressive outreach. Primarily because of misplaced emphases and misconstrued priorities, intervention initiatives often fail to meet the objectives of social justice and equity. Furthermore, they may even result in distancing people in marginalized communities further, on account of unintended consequences of welfare activity. This can be seen in the large number of youth that hang precariously in between the world that they knew and the one that was implicitly promised to them. In spite of claims about coverage in terms of numbers, providing ecologically valid, cultural relevant and socially just services is restricted to a handful of committed agencies. This article will focus on specific instances of educational and welfare programmes that are advanced without either the knowledge about or respect for local community ideology in the desire to bring about social change for their “upliftment”. A special case in point is the persistent inability for the poor to access and participate in good quality education despite their enthusiasm and motivation. After providing an overview of the ideological mismatch between local culture and global policy, I will also give examples of experiments that have been successful in working towards ethically and scientifically sound welfare initiatives.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
References
Adichie, C. (2009). The danger of a single story. TED talks https://www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story/transcript?language=en. Accessed 15 Dec 2018.
Arnett, J. (2008). The neglected 95%: why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614.
Attiah, K. (2014). Why won’t the US retify the U. N. child rights treaty? The Washington Post, November 21st, 2014. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2014/11/21/why-wont-the-u-s-ratify-the-u-n-s-child-rights-treaty/?utm_term=.a1c133523e56. Accessed 15 Dec 2018.
Bhatia, S. (2018). Decolonising psychology: globalisation, social justice and youth identities. New York: Oxford University Press.
Burman, E. (1996). Local, global or globalized? Child development and international child rights legislation. Childhood, 3(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568296003001004.
Chaudhary, N. (2017). Childhood, culture and social science: what we have gained and may be in the process of losing. In T. S. Saraswathi, A. Madan, & S. Menon (Eds.), Childhoods in India: Traditions, trends and transformations. New Delhi: Routledge ISBN: 9781138221710, 9781315098395. Accessed 15 Dec 2018.
Chaudhary, N. (2018). Cross-cultural psychology as a solution to global inequality: optimism, overconfidence or naiveté? An invited commentary on ‘The Positive Role of Culture: What Cross-Cultural Psychology Has to Offer to Developmental Aid Effectiveness Research’, by Symen A. Brouwers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(4), 535–544.
Devy, G. N. (2017). The crisis within: On education in India. New Delhi: Aleph.
Feinberg, C. (2016). The science of scarcity. The Harvard Magazine, May-June, 2015. Retrieved from: http://harvardmagazine.com/2015/05/the-science-of-scarcity. Accessed 15 Dec 2018.
Gergen, K., Gulerce, A., Lock, A., & Misra, G. (1996). Psychological science in cultural context. American Psychologist, 51(2), 496–503.
Goonsekere, S. (1997). Children, law and justice: a south Asian perspective. New Delhi: SAGE.
Henrich, J., Heine, H. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.
Keller, H., & Chaudhary, N. (2017). Is the mother essential for attachment? Models of care in different cultures. In H. Keller & K. Bard (Eds.), The cultural nature of attachment: contextualizing relationships and development (pp. 109–137). Cambridge: MIT Press https://www.esforum.de; https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/cultural-nature-attachment ISBN: 9780262036900. Accessed 15 Dec 2018.
Lemieux, C. (2012). Philosophie et sociologie: le prix du passage. Sociologie, 3(2), 199–209.
LeVine, R. A., & Norman, K. (2001). The infant’s acquisition of culture: early attachment reexamined in anthropological perspective. In C. C. Moore & H. F. Mathews (Eds.), The psychology of cultural experience (pp. 83–104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lucas, J. S. (2016). Side by side with responsive parents in the care for child development intervention. Early childhood matters. The Hague: Bernard van Leer Foundation https://bernardvanleer.org/app/uploads/2016/07/Early-Childhood-Matters-2016_11.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2018.
Maffi, L., & Woodley, E. (2012). Biocultural diversity conservation. London: Earthscan.
Misra, G. (1994). Psychology of control: cross-cultural considerations. The Journal of Individual Psychology, l2, 8–45.
Montenegro, M., & Glavin, T. (2015). In defense of difference. Seed Magazine. October 28th, 2015. Retrieved from http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/in_defense_of_difference/ on November 1st, 2015. Accessed 15 Dec 2018.
Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2014). Scarcity: the new science of having less and how it defines our lives. New York: Times Books.
Nielsen, M., Haun, D., Kärtner, J., & Legare, C. H. (2017). The persistent sampling bias in psychology: a call to action. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 162, 31–38.
Poonam, S. (2018). The dreamers: how young Indians are changing the world. New Delhi: Penguin.
Rajan, R. G., & Subhramanian, A. (2007). Aid and growth: what does cross-country evidence really show? National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 11513. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w11513. Accessed 15 Dec 2018.
Raman, V. (2000). Politics of childhood: perspectives from the South. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(46), 4055–4064.
Ramanujan, A. K. (1991). Folktales from India: a selection of oral tales from twenty-two languages. New York: Pantheon.
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality re-examined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Serpell, R. (1993). The significance of schooling: Life-journeys in an African society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Serpell, R., & Nsamenang, B. (2014). Locally relevant and quality ECCE programmes: implications of research on indigenous African child development and socialization. Early Childhood Care and Education Series (Vol. 3). Paris: UNESCO.
Singh, B. (2015). Poverty and the quest for life: spiritual and material strivings in rural India. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Sperry, D. E., Miller, P. J., & Sperry, L. L. (2018). Hazardous intersections: crossing disciplinary lines in developmental psychology. European Journal of Social Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431018812465.
Thapar, R. (2014). The past as present. Forging contemporary identities through history. New Delhi: Aleph Books.
Valsiner, J. (2017). Unity of the human mind at the age of globalisation (4th ed.). Bochum: Hans Kilian Preis Lecture April 28, 2017.
Weber, A., Fernald, A., & Diop, Y. (2017). When cultural norms discourage talking to babies: effectiveness of a parenting program in rural Senegal. Child Development, 88(5), 1513–1526.
Weisner, T. W., & Gallimore, R. (1977). My brother's keeper: child and sibling caretaking. Current Anthropology, 18(2), 169–190.
Woodhead, M. (1999). Reconstructing development psychology: some first steps. Children and Society, 13, 3–19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chaudhary, N. The Science and Ethics of Intervention Programmes in Family and Child Welfare: Towards Building an Inclusive Psychology for Social Justice. Hu Arenas 3, 155–171 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-019-00071-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-019-00071-z