Skip to main content
Log in

Postmodernism and Crises in Psychology

  • Arena of Becoming
  • Published:
Human Arenas Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The twentieth century went through a turmoil that produced crises in almost all the academic disciplines, but also in our civilization as such. In the 1980s, postmodernity appeared as one of the buzzwords that tried to rationalize some aspects of the turmoil. Many had problems with the term (like Lapoujade, this volume). This paper, however, pursues the crisis in psychology that Karl Bühler and Lev Vygotsky invited to discuss in the late 1920s. The aim is to examine what this crisis actually was about. A closer look at the appearance of psychology in philosophy in the eighteenth century demonstrates that rather philosophy instead of psychology went into a crisis. The objective aspects of medieval philosophy represented a kind of stability in the discipline. Yet, when psychology appeared as a part of metaphysics in the German Enlightenment, this stability was severely disturbed. The aspect of subjectivity that psychology introduced to philosophy created a crisis that provoked Immanuel Kant and forced him to develop his critical philosophy. Since then, subjectivity has been an accepted aspect of philosophy, but not with full agreement about how it should be understood. On this basis, Edmund Husserl talked about a crisis in European sciences in general. This paper, on the other hand, highlights the postmodern assumption, which says that the crisis is to be located in narratives produced by the sciences themselves. The broader the narratives are, the more they appear as self-contradictory. The more they pretend to explain, the more they fail to grasp the indeterminacy that is embedded in reality and actual life. As long as psychology is about the actual life, psychology is a science that can tell us about the crisis in narratives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adorno, T.W. (1966). Negative Dialektik, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition. Second Edition, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

  • Baumgarten, A. G. (2004). Metaphysik, ûbersetzt von Ge. Friedr. Meier, Jena, Dietrich Scheglmann Reprints.

  • Billig, M. (1997). From codes to utterances: cultural studies, discourse and psychology, in Ferguson, M & P. Golding (Eds.)(1997). Cultural studies in question, London, Sage, pp. 205–226.

  • Blumenthal, A.L. (1973) Introduction, in Wundt, W. (1973). The language of gestures, The Hague, Mouton.

  • Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind. How psychology found its language. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (2015). Principles of philosophy, in Descartes, R. (2015). The passions of the soul and other late writings, Transl. By M. Moriarty, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 119–166.

  • Foucault, M. (1981). The order of discourse, Transl. By I. McLeod in Young, R. (Ed.)(1981). Untying the text: a post-structuralist reader, Boston, Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 51–78.

  • Foucault, M. (1998). The will to knowledge. The history of sexuality. Volume 1, Transl. By R. Hurley, London, Penguin Books.

  • Foucault, M. (2008). Introduction to Kant’s Anthropology, Transl. By R. Nigro & K. Briggs, Los Angeles, Semiotexte.

  • Føllesdal, D. (1969). Husserl’s notion of noema, The Journal of Philosophy 66 (1969), pp. 680–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge UK, Polity.

  • Husserl, E. (1935/1970). The Vienna lecture, in Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology, Transl. by D. Carr, Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 269–299.

  • Husserl, E. (1970). Logical Investigation 1, Prolegomena to pure logic; expression and meaning; the ideal unity of species, 2nd Ed. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul

  • Husserl, E. (1998). The Paris lectures, transl. By P. Koestenbaum, Dorrecht, Kluwer Husserl, E. (2001). Logical investigations. Vol. 1, Transl. By J.N. Findlay, London, Routledge.

  • Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1959). Amerikanische Beobachtungen eines Bühler-Schülers, Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, Vol. 6, 1959, pp. 69–76.

  • Kierkegaard, S. (2009). Repetition and philosophical crumbs, Transl. by M.G. Piety, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

  • Klempe, S.H. (2014). Kierkegaard and the rise of modern psychology, New Brunswick NJ, Transaction Publishers.

  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern, Tranls. By C. Porter, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge, Transl. By G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Minneapolis MN, University of Minnesota Press Lyotard, J-F. (1986). Det postmoderne forklaret for børn, Korrespondance 1982–85, oversat av Brügger, Frandsen & Lervad, København, Akademisk forlag.

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1991). The inhuman, Transl. By G. Bennington & R. Bowlby, Cambridge UK, Polity Press.

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S. (2000). Social representations. Explorations in social psychology, Cambridge UK, Polity Press.

  • Piaget, J. (1973). Structuralism, Transl. By C. Maschler, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1956). Being and nothingness. A phenomenological essay on ontology, New York, Washington Square Press.

  • Saussure, F. de (2011). Cours in general linguistics, Transl. by W. Baskin, New York, Columbia University Press.

  • Sturm, T. (2012). Bühler and Popper: Kantian therapies for the crisis in psychology, studies in the history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences 43 (2012), pp 462–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, F. (2011). The sciences of the soul. The early modern origins of psychology, Transl. by S. Brown, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

  • Vygotsky, L. (1930/1997). Preface to Bühler, in Rieber, R.W. & J. Wollock (1997)(Eds.). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Volume 3, Problems of the theory and history of psychology, including the chapter on the crisis in psychology, New York, Plenum Press, pp 163–173.

  • Vygotsky, L. (1997). The crisis in psychology, in in Rieber, R.W. & J. Wollock (1997)(Eds.). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Volume 3, Problems of the theory and history of psychology, including the chapter on the crisis in psychology, New York, Plenum Press, pp 233–344.

  • Wundt, W. (1902). Outlines of psychology. Second revised English edition from the fourth revised German edition, Transl. By C.H. Judd, London, Wilhelm Engelmann.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven Hroar Klempe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klempe, S.H. Postmodernism and Crises in Psychology. Hu Arenas 1, 373–385 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-018-0038-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-018-0038-2

Keywords

Navigation