Skip to main content
Log in

From Calamities to Disasters: Pitirim Aleksandrovič Sorokin’s Insights

  • COFFEE BREAK
  • Published:
Human Arenas Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When Sorokin wrote the book Man and Society in Calamity, it was very clear what he meant by calamities—natural or man-made (war and revolution, famine, and pestilence)—and how these “monsters” transformed the normal flow of individuals’ lives. Indeed, since calamities occur in each and every age, they exert great influence on many aspects of everyday life: from forms of thought to acting, from social life to the cultural processes of society. Sorokin defines the “typical effects” that are repeated whenever disasters of the same type occur. The principle still holds today; after many years, the lexicon has changed, preferring the term disaster to calamity (now considered archaic, obsolete), but the effects of the events that we call disasters—on the thoughts, behavior, social organization, and cultural life of individuals—have not changed. And this is true despite the fact that scholars not always agree on which events should and/or could fall into this category. In contemporary society, we can hypothesize, even if briefly, the classification and the characteristics of disasters, since these elements differentiate the actions taken by the community affected and by those providing aid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: have we understimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely eversive events? American Psychologist, 59, 20–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A., Galea, S., Bucciarelli, A., & Vlahov, D. (2006). Psychological resilience after disaster. Psychological Science, 17, 181–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, G. A. (2001). Disasters, sociology of. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 6, pp. 3718–3721). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mangone, E. (2017). Social and cultural dynamics revisiting the Work of Pitirim A. Sorokin. Cham: Springer International Publisher AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangone, E. (2018). The reconstruction of a new system of needs after a post-war emergency. In S. Schliewe, N. Chaudhary, & G. Marsico (Eds.), Cultural psychology of intervention in the globalized world. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Manyena, S. B. (2006). The concept of resilience. Disasters, 30(4), 433–450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 127–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, B. D., Thomas, D. S. K., Fothergill, A., & Blinn-Pike, L. (Eds.). (2010). Social vulnerability to disaster. Boca Raton: CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1972). L’épistémologie des relations interdisciplinaires. In OCDE (ed.), L’interdisciplinarité: problèmes d’enseignement et de recherche dans les universités. Paris: OCDE. Retrieved June 20, 2015, from http://www.fondationjeanpiaget.ch/fjp/site/textes/VE/jp72_epist_relat_interdis.pdf.

  • Sorokin, P. A. (1948). The reconstruction of humanity. Boston: The Bacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, P. A. (1958). Integralism is my philosophy. In W. Burnett (Ed.), This is my Philosophy Twenty of the World’s Outstanding Thinkers reveal the Deepest Meaning they have found in Life (pp. 180–189). London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, P. A. (2010). Man and society in calamity. Brunswick (U.S.A.) and London (U.K.): Transaction Publishers (orig. ed. 1942).

  • van den Eynde, J., & Veno, A. (1999). Coping with disastrous events: an empowering model of community healing. In R. Gist & B. Lubin (Eds.), Response to disaster: psychosocial community and ecological approaches (pp. 167–192). Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emiliana Mangone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mangone, E. From Calamities to Disasters: Pitirim Aleksandrovič Sorokin’s Insights. Hu Arenas 1, 79–85 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-018-0001-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-018-0001-2

Keywords

Navigation