Skip to main content
Log in

Rootstock effects on seed yield and quality in watermelon

  • Research Report
  • Published:
Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 24 January 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

This research was conducted to investigate rootstock effects on seed yield and quality in watermelon. The work was conducted in the experimental fields and laboratories of the Department of Horticulture of the University of Cukurova in the 2016 and 2017 growing seasons. Watermelon cv. Crimson sweet (CS) scion was grafted onto three different rootstocks (Cucurbita ‘NUN-9075’, Lagenaria ‘Argentario’, and citron watermelon ‘PI296341’). Plants were assessed according to their main stem length, main stem diameter, number of nodes, biomass, pollen production and development, fruit yield and quality, and seed yield and quality. NUN-9075/CS and Argentario/CS graft combinations resulted in higher average stem length, plant biomass, fruit yield and quality, seed yield, seed emergence, and germination percentage. There was no significant difference observed between graft combinations in pollen viability, pollen germination, and normal pollen production. No significant difference was observed between graft combinations in accelerated ageing (AA), and the seed germination decreased after AA of 192 h. In the second year (2017), there was higher main stem length, main stem diameter, total fruit yield, seed yield, and number of seeds per fruit compared to the first year (2016). Based on the results of this study, NUN-9075 rootstock performed better than other rootstocks; hence, it is recommended as the best rootstock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 24 January 2020

    The original version of the acknowledgement unfortunately contained a mistake.

  • 24 January 2020

    The original version of the acknowledgement unfortunately contained a mistake.

References

  • Alexopoulos AA, Kondylis A, Passam H (2007) Fruit yield and quality of watermelon in relation to grafting. J Food Agric Environ 5:178–189. https://doi.org/10.3923/ja.2007.362.365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambika S, Manonmani V, Somasundaram G (2014) Review on effect of seed size on seedling vigour and seed yield. Res J Seed Sci 7:31–38. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjss.2014.31.38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews PK, Marquez CS (1993) Graft incompatibility. Hort Rev Am Soc Hort Sci 15:183–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Baalbaki R, Elias S, Marcos-Filho J, McDonald MB (2009) Seed vigor testing handbook. AOSA Ithaca NY USA (contribution to the handbook on seed testing, 32)

  • Barbosa WFS, Steiner F, de Oliveira LCM, Henrique P, das Chagas M (2016) Comparison of seed priming techniques with regards to germination and growth of watermelon seedlings in laboratory condition. Afr J Biotechnol 15:2596–2602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bie Z, Han X, Zhu J, Tang M, Huang Y (2010) Effect of nine squash rootstocks on the plant growth and fruit quality of melon. Acta Hortic 856:77–82

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bosgnin DA (2002) Origin and evolution of cultivated cucurbits. Cienc Rural 32:715–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton BD, Fish WW, Roberts W, Popham TW (2009) The influence of rootstock selection on fruit quality attributes of watermelon. Open Food Sci J 3:5–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Colla G, Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Rea M (2006) Effect of salinity on yield, fruit quality, leaf gas exchange, and mineral composition of grafted watermelon plants. HortScience 41:622–627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demir I, Mavi K (2008) Effect of salt and osmotic stresses on the germination of pepper seeds of different maturation stages. Braz Arch Biol Technol 51:897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djidonou D, Gao Z, Zhao X (2013) Economic analysis of grafted tomato production in sandy soils in northern Florida. Horttechnology 23:613–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elazar F, Zoran I (2014) Grafted vegetables—the influence of rootstock and scion on post harvest quality. Folia Hortic 26:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eti S, Stosser R (1988) Fertility of the mandarin variety clementine citrus–reticulata blanco I. Pollen quality and pollen tube growth. Hortic Sci 53:160–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez HG, Godina FR, Ortiz HO, Mendoza AB, Torres VR, De la Fuente MC (2017) Use of chitosan-PVA hydrogels with copper nanoparticles to improve the growth of grafted watermelon. Molecules 22:1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22071031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn CA, Weber JL, McGill AT, Kruger MC (2015) Increased intake of selected vegetables, herbs and fruit may reduce bone turnover in post-menopausal women. J Nutr 7:2499–2517

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta PC (1993) Seed vigour testing. In: Agrawal PK (ed) Handbook of seed testing. DAC, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi, pp 242–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaskani MJ, Kwon SW, Kim DH (2005) Comparative study on vegetative, reproductive and qualitative traits of seven diploid and tetraploid watermelon lines. Euphytica 145:259–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King SR, Davis AR, Zhang XP, Crosby K (2010) Genetics, breeding and selection of rootstocks for Solanaceae and Cucurbitaceae. Sci Hortic 127:106–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong QS, Chen JL, Liu Y, Ma YH, Liu P, Wu SY, Bie ZL (2014) Genetic diversity of Cucurbita rootstock germplasm as assessed using simple sequence repeat markers. Sci Hortic 175:150–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lima MS, Cardoso AII, Verdial MF (2003) Plant spacing and pollen quantity on yield and quality of squash seed. Hortic Bras 21:443–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Ren J, Zhang Y, An J, Chen M, Chen H, Xu C, Ren H (2015) A new grafted rootstock against root-knot nematode for cucumber, melon, and watermelon. Agron Sustain Dev 35:251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Galarza S, San Bautista A, Perez DM (2004) Effects of grafting and cytokinin-induced fruit setting on color and sugar-content traits in glasshouse-grown triploid watermelon. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 79:971–976

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marcos-Filho J (2015) Seed vigor testing: an overview of the past, present and future perspective. Sci Agric 72:363–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsic KN, Znidarcic D, Jakse M (2016) Different scion/rootstock combinations influence the yield and quality of grafted watermelon fruits. Acta Hortic 1142:19–24. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2016.1142.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavi K, Atak M (2016) Effect of organic priming on seedling emergence of watermelon under low temperature stress. In: Proceedings of the 7th international scientific agriculture symposium, “Agrosym 2016”. Jahorina, pp 1727–1732

  • McGregor CE, Waters V (2013) Pollen viability of F1 hybrids between watermelon cultivars and disease-resistant, infraspecific crop wild relatives. HortScience 48:1428–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeuse AD (1962) The Cucurbitaceae of Southern Africa. Bothalia 8:1–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed FH, Abd El-Hamed KE, Elwan MWM, Hussien MNE (2014) Evaluation of different grafting methods and rootstocks in watermelon grown in Egypt. Sci Hortic 168:145–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naz A, Butt MS, Sultan MT, Qayyum MMN, Niaz RS (2014) Watermelon lycopene and allied health claims. EXCLI J 13:650–660

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nerson H (2004) Fruit-set order affects seed yield and germinability in melon (Cucumis melo L.). J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 79:985–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerson H (2005) Effects of fruit shape and plant density on seed yield and quality of squash. Sci Hortic 105:293–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerson H, Paris HS (2002) Relationship between fruit shape and seed yield in Cucurbita pepo. Rep Cucurbit Genet Cooperative 24:82–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton JD (1966) Testing of plum pollen viability with tetrazolium salts. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 89:132–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Olaniyi JO, Tella BA (2011) Effects of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers on the growth, seed yield and nutritional values of egusi melon (Citrullus lanatus (Thumb) Mans.) in Ogbomoso South west Nigeria. Int Res J Plant Sci 2:328–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozmen S, Kanber R, Sari N, Unlu M (2015) The effects of deficit irrigation on nitrogen consumption, yield, and quality in drip irrigated grafted and ungrafted watermelon. J Integr Agric 14:966–976

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paris H (2017) Origin of the dessert watermelon, Citrullus lanatus. Acta Hortic 1151:87–94. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1151.15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren Y, McGregor C, Zhang Y, Gong G, Zhang H, Guo S, Sun H, Cai W, Zhang J, Xu Y (2014) An integrated genetic map based on four mapping populations and quantitative trait loci associated with economically important traits in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). BMC Plant Biol 14:33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sain RS, Joshi P (2003) Pollen fertility of interspecific F1 hybrids in genus Citrullus (Cucurbitaceae). Curr Sci 85:431–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Singh P, Sanders DC, Wehner TC (2001) Germination of watermelon seeds at low temperature. Rep Cucurbit Genet Cooperative 24:59–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares VN, Rodrigues HCS, Gadotti GI, Meneghello GE, Villela FA (2016) Influence of fungi associated with watermelon seeds on physiological and health quality. Aust J Crop Sci 10:852–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souza RHV, Villela FA, Aumonde TZ (2013) Methodologies based on seedling performance for vigor assessment of pumpkin seed. J Seed Sci 35:374–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanghellini MS, Schultheis JR (2005) Genotypic variability in staminate flower and pollen grain production of diploid watermelons. HortScience 40:752–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turhan A, Ozmen N, Kuscu H, Serbeci MS, Seniz V (2012) Influence of rootstocks on yield and fruit characteristics and quality of watermelon. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 53:336–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Shang L, Luan F (2013) A highly efficient regeneration system for watermelon (Citrullus Lanatus Thunb.). Pak J Bot 45:145–150

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yetisir H, Sari N (2004) Effect of hypocotyls morphology on survival rate and growth of watermelon seedlings grafted on rootstocks with different emergence performance at various temperatures. Turk J Agric For 28:231–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Yetisir H, Caliskan ME, Soylu S, Sakar M (2006) Some physiological and growth responses of watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thumb.) Matsum. and Nakai] grafted onto Lagenaria siceraria to flooding. Environ Exp Bot 58:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Cukurova University Scientific Research Project Unit (Grant No. FDK-2016-6465) (Bilimsel Araştırma Projesi—BAP). We also thank Antalya seedling Company for providing seeds and seedlings production. Indebted thanks to Ph.D. and M.Sc. students who helped during field and laboratory work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nebahat Sari.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised due to a retrospective Open Access order.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kombo, M.D., Sari, N. Rootstock effects on seed yield and quality in watermelon. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 60, 303–312 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-019-00131-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-019-00131-x

Keywords

Navigation