Skip to main content
Log in

Identification and crop performance of acid sulfate soil-tolerant rice varieties

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aims to: 1) identify acid sulfate soil (ASS)-tolerant rice varieties from the genetic stock of Korean rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties under ASS conditions; 2) to evaluate their yield performance, and elucidate the physiological mechanism for ASS tolerance with the identified tolerant varieties. Two hundred sixty-six rice varieties were screened for ASS tolerance, and we identified two japonica-indica hybrid varieties, Geumgang (GG) and Pungsan (PS), as having high tolerance under ASS paddy conditions (pH 3). We first conducted a yield trial of GG and PS grown in Wagner pots to determine their potential yields under ASS conditions. A yield trial under paddy field condition followed. In the pot experiment, the ASS-tolerant varieties, GG and PS, showed significantly higher yields than PT-1, which is a local reference variety in mildly improved soil pH conditions (pH 4.1–4.6). Al and Fe content in GG and PS were significantly lower than that of PT-1, so there might be some mechanism that inhibits the absorption of toxic metal ions in the tolerant varieties. In the paddy conditions, the grain yields more than 5 t ha−1 of the two tolerant varieties under mildly improved soil pH condition were significantly higher than PT-1. Dry matter weights of above ground parts also showed the same trend as grain yield. The study demonstrated that the ASS-tolerant japonica-indica rice varieties with high yielding potential could contribute to the improvement of rice yield in ASS regions, and will be good materials for the development of acid soil-tolerant rice varieties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Attanandana T, Chakranon B, Kyuma K, Moncharoen P. 1999. Improvement of a peat soil for rice cultivation in Thailand. Jpn. J. Trop. Agric. 43: 91–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark RB, Zeto SK, Baligar VC, Ritchey KD. 1997. Growth traits and mineral concentrations of maize hybrids grown on unlimed and lime acid soil. J. Plant Nutr. 20: 1773–1795

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farina MPW, Channon P, Thibaud GR. 2000. A comparison of strategies for ameliorating subsoil acidity: II. Long-term soil effects. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64: 652–658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foy CD. 1992. Soil chemical factors limiting plant root growth. Adv. Soil Sci. 19: 97–149

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • International Rice Research Institute. 1996. Standard evaluation system for rice. Ed 4, IRRI, Manila, pp. 35

    Google Scholar 

  • Itoh T, Saigusa M. 2002. Yield survey method. In: Hashiba, T. and Kanahama K. (Eds.) A manual of experiments for agriculture. Soft Science Publications, Tokyo, pp 32–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Izaguirre-Mayoral ML, Sinclair TR. 2005. Soybean genotypic difference in growth, nutrient accumulation and ultrastructure in response to manganese and iron supply in solution culture. Ann. Bot. 96: 149–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jugsujinda A, Krairapanond A, Patrick WH Jr. 1995. Influence of extractable iron, aluminum, and manganese on P-sorption in flooded acid sulfate soils. Biol. Fertil. Soil 20: 118–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kang DJ, Futakuchi K, Dumnoenngam S, Ishii R. 2007. Highyielding performance of a new rice variety, IR53650 in mildly improved acid sulfate soil conditions. Plant Prod. Sci. 10: 64–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang DJ, Futakuchi K, Dumnoenngam S, Mechai T, Chakranon B, Ishii R. 2001. Factors related to differences in rice yield among districts in Narathiwat Province, southern Thailand. Jpn. J. Trop. Agric. 45: 49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang DJ, Ishii R. 2003. Studies on acid soil tolerance of rice plants (Oryza sativa L.): I. Morphological and physiological characteristics of acid soil tolerant varieties of rice plants. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 72: 171–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kang DJ, Ishii R. 2006. Formation of organic acids in the root apices of rice plants (Oryza sativa L.) grown in acidic nutrient solution containing aluminum. Plant Prod. Sci. 9: 228–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khatiwada SP, Senedhira D, Carpena AL, Zeigler RS, Fernandez PG. 1996. Variability and genetics of tolerance for aluminum toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 93: 738–744

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kinraide TB. 1997. Reconsidering the rhizotoxicity to hydroxyl, sulphate, and fluoride complexes of aluminum. J. Exp. Bot. 48: 1115–1124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kinraide TB, Parker DR, Zobel RW. 2005. Organic acid secretion as a mechanism of aluminum resistance: a model incorporating the root cortex, epidermis, and the external unstirred layer. J. Exp. Bot. 56: 1853–1865

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ma JF, Nagao S, Huang CF, Nishimura M. 2005. Isolation and characterization of a rice mutant hypersensitive to Al. Plant Cell Physiol. 46: 1054–1061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ma JF, Shen R, Zhao Z, Wissuwa M, Takeuchi Y, Ebitani E, Yano M. 2002. Response of rice to Al stress and identification of quantitative trait loci for Al tolerance. Plant Cell Physiol. 43: 652–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minella E, Sorrells ME. 1992. Aluminum tolerance in barley: genetic relationships among genotypes of diverse origin. Crop Sci. 32: 593–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miyasaka SC, Hawes MC. 2001. Possible role of root border cells in detection and avoidance of aluminum toxicity. Plant Physiol. 125: 1978–1987

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moraghan JT. 1992. Iron-manganese relationships in white lupin grown on a calciaquoll. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56: 471–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osaki M, Watababe T, Tadano T. 1997. Beneficial effect of aluminum on growth of plants adapted to low pH soils. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 43: 551–563

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reid DA, Fleming AL, Foy AD. 1971. A methods for determining aluminum response of barley in nutrient solution in comparison to response in Al-toxic soil. Agron. J. 63: 600–603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan PR, Shaff IE, Kochian LV. 1992. Aluminum toxicity in roots: Correlation among ionic currents, ion fluxes, and root elongation in aluminum-sensitive and aluminum-tolerant wheat cultivars. Plant Physiol. 99: 1193–1200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vijarnsorn P, Eswaran H. 2002. The Soil Resources of Thailand. First Press Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 55–84

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll HR, Mutert E. 1995. Global extent, development and economic impact of acid soils. Plant Soil 171: 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Willert FJ, Stehouwer RC. 2003. Compost, limestone, and gypsum effects on calcium and aluminum transport in acidic minespoil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67: 778–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe T, Okada K. 2005. Interaction effects of Al, Ca and other cations on root elongation of rice cultivars under low pH. Ann. Bot. 95: 379–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yampracha S, Attanandana T, Sidibe-Diarra A, Yost RS. 2005. Predicting the dissolution of rock phosphates in flooded acid sulfate soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 69: 2000–2011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JL, Zhang L, Li YY, You JF, Wu P, Zheng SJ. 2006. Citrate transports play a critical role in aluminum-stimulated citrate efflux in rice bean (Vigna umbellate) roots. Ann. Bot. 97: 579–584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kang, DJ., Seo, YJ., Lee, BK. et al. Identification and crop performance of acid sulfate soil-tolerant rice varieties. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 13, 75–81 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-010-0002-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-010-0002-2

Key words

Navigation