Skip to main content
Log in

A study on driver’s workload of telematics using a driving simulator: A comparison among information modalities

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, diffusion of telematics services and an explosive increase of in-vehicle display devices, such as Car Navigation Systems (CNSs), are becoming the new causes of traffic accidents. This is due to ‘inattention’ caused by an increase in the driver’s mental workload while he/she is driving. This situation has lead many countries to consider controlling the use of in-vehicle devices while driving through legislation. This research studies the effect of voice or display information systems on drivers through the Driver Eye Movement Analysis and the measurement of response ability. The experiment is carried out in a driving simulator and the results are presented through the comparative analysis of the driver’s visual field via the gaze tracking device and the average of correct answer rates for arithmetic problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cho, K. Y., Bae, C. H., Chu, Y. and Suh, M. W., “An Overview of Telematics: a System Architecture Approach,” Int. J. Automotive Technology, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 509–517, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kim, H. K. and Lee, S. Y., “Trend of Telematics Technology,” J. Korea Institute of Communication Science, Vol. 20, No. 12, pp. 14–31, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ross, T. and Burnett, G., “Evaluating the Human-Machine Interface to Vehicle Navigation Systems as an Example of Ubiquitous Computing,” Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 661–674, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Road Traffic Safety Authority (South Korea), “Statistical Analysis of Traffic Accident,” RTSA Annual Report, pp. 61–70, 2005.

  5. Lal, S. K. and Craig, A., “A critical review of the psychophysiology of driver fatigue,” Biol. Psychol., Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 173–194, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi, I. K., “A Study on the Analysis of Interface Design on Car Navigation System,” Proc. Conference of Korea Multimedia, pp. 361–367, 2002.

  7. Wang, Y., Zhang, W., Wu, S. and Guo, Y., “Simulator for Driving Safety Study — A Literature Review,” Virtual Reality, Vol. 4563, pp. 584–593, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Suh, M. W., Koo, T. Y., Kwon, S. J., Shin, Y. S., Cho, K. Y. and Park, D. Y., “Development of SVPG,” Trans. Korean Society of Automotive Engineer, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 195–200, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Park, P. and Cha, D. W., “Development of Human-Machine Interface Evaluation System and Simulator for Car Navigation System,” Proc. ESK Conference, pp. 13–18, 1998.

  10. Nobuyuki, U., Yoichi, A. and Kenshiro, P., “Effects of Cell Phone Conversation Load on Viewpoints Control while Driving,” JARI Research Journal, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 229–232, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yuji, U., Shinichi, U. K., Takero, H., Ryuta, T. and Toshihiro, W., “Voice Information System that Adapts to Driver’s Mental Workload,” R&D Review of Toyota CRDL, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 16–22, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Young, K., Regan, M. and Hammer, M., “Driver Distraction: A Review of the Literature,” Monash University, Accident Research Centre, Report No. 206, pp. 44–52, 2003.

  13. Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., Walker, G. H., Baber, C. and Jenkins, D. P., “Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design,” Ashgate Publishing Limited, pp. 301–305, 2005.

  14. Angell, L., Auflick, J., Austria, P. A., Kochhar, D., Tijerina, L., Biever, W., Diptiman, T., Hogsett, J. and Kiger, S., “Driver Workload Metrics Project Task2 Final Report,” DOT Technical Report, No. DOT HS 810 635, pp. 427–433, 2006.

  15. Jin, H., Katusuura, T., Iwanaga, K., Shimomura, Y., Sugiura, K. and Mochizuki, M., “Evaluation of mental workload accompanying the cognitive task of in- vehicle information device,” Proc. 6th Asian Design International Conference, 2003.

  16. Takada, Y. and Shimoyama, O., “Evaluation of drivingassistance system based on drivers’ workload,” Proc. Int. Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, 2001.

  17. Uno, H. and Hiramatsu, K., “Effect of auditory distractions on driving behavior during lane change course negotiation: estimation of spare mental capacity as a index of attention distraction,” JSAE Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 219–224, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myung-Won Suh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koo, TY., Park, KJ., Kim, BY. et al. A study on driver’s workload of telematics using a driving simulator: A comparison among information modalities. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 10, 59–63 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-009-0048-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-009-0048-6

Keywords

Navigation