Skip to main content
Log in

Graduate construction management programs in the U.S.: Lessons learned from leading institutions

  • Information Technology
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Graduate programs in construction can be designed to incorporate a broad range of subjects, including construction management, construction engineering, and other management subjects. However, few studies were performed previously on the graduate education in construction management and the operation of graduate programs. Thus, a study is necessary to evaluate current construction management programs at the graduate level before discussing how to develop them further. This study aims at identifying leading construction management programs in the US by using a relevant ranking method and investigating how they manage and operate graduate programs in universities. The authors have developed a survey questionnaire to identify overall facts regarding graduate program management. The major findings obtained from surveying 16 schools are illustrated and explained in detail in this paper. The results obtained from the survey are expected to provide useful information to a practical side as well as an academic side. They become an important asset if a university has a plan to launch a new construction graduate program or there are some schools that intend to reflect their current situations by comparing with other peer institutions. For a practical purpose, they will provide useful information to people considering construction as their higher degrees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abudayyeh, O., Dibert-DeYoung, A., and Jaselskis, E. (2004). “Analysis of trends in construction research: 1985-2002.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 130, No. 3, pp. 433–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arditi, D. and Polat, G. (2010). “Graduate education in construction management.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vo. 136, No. 3, pp. 175–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atalah, A. and Muchemedzi, R. (2006). “Improving enrollment in the master of construction management program at bowling green state university.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol. 132, No. 4, pp. 312–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinowsky, P. S. and Diekmann, J. E. (2004). “Construction engineering management educators: History and deteriorating community.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 130, No. 5, pp. 751–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, G. R. (2011). The economics of tuition and fees in higher educationhttp://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1068&context=workingpapers〉.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, A. and Rask, K. (2007). “The influence of the U.S. news and world report collegiate rankings on the matriculation decision of high-ability students: 1995–2004.” Economics of Education Review, pp. 244–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. B. (1992). “A challenge for research.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vo1. 118, No. 3, pp. 422–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahren, C. T. and Johnston, D. W. (2011). “Linkages between construction engineering education and research.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 137, No. 10, pp. 887–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jortberg, R. F. and Haggard, T. R. (1993). CII: The first ten years, construction industry institute, Bureau of Engineering Research, The University of Texas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakmazaheri, S. and Rasdorf, W. (1998). “Foundation for research in computing in civil engineering.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledbetter, B. S. (1985). “Pioneering construction engineering education.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 111, No. 1, pp. 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. N. and Cheng, Y. (2005). “Academic ranking of world universities — Methodologies and problems.” Higher Education in Europe, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberlender, G. D. (1984). “Development of construction research.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 110, No. 4, pp. 486–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oglesby, C. H. (1982). “Construction education: Past, present, and future.” Journal of Construction Division, Vol. 108, No. 4, pp. 605–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oglesby, C. H. (1990). “Dilemmas facing construction education and research in 1990s.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 116, No. 1, pp. 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellicer, E., Yepes, V., and Ortega, A. J. (2013). “Method for planning graduate programs in construction management.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol. 139, No. 1, pp. 33–41 〈http://dx.dio.org/10.1061/(ASCE)El.1943-5541.0000120〉.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. S., Hanna, A., Bank, L C., and Shapira, A. (2007). “Education in construction engineering and management built on tradition: Blue print for tomorrow.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 133, No. 9, pp. 661–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J (2005). “Challenges in ranking of universities.” Invited paper for the First International Conference on World Class Universities, Shanghai Jaio Tong University, Shanghai, June 16–18, pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. T. (2001). “A principal component analysis of the U.S. news & world report tier rankings of colleges and universities.” Economics of Education Review, Vol. 20,Issue 3, pp. 235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, K. B. (2005). “Researching internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 10, No. 3, Article 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yepes, V., Pellicer, E., and Ortega, A. J. (2012). “Designing a benchmark indicator for managerial competences in construction at the graduate level.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol. 138, No. 1, pp. 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sangwook Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, S., Esmaeilzadeh, A. & Lee, DE. Graduate construction management programs in the U.S.: Lessons learned from leading institutions. KSCE J Civ Eng 17, 1664–1671 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0493-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0493-8

Keywords

Navigation