Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Aortic root enlargement in patients undergoing double valve replacement for rheumatic etiology–preliminary results

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Combined aortic and mitral valve disease is usually of rheumatic origin. In these patients we often encounter problem of small valve annuli particularly with aortic annulus. It is still debated whether a small prosthesis should be used or aortic root should be enlarged to prevent Patient Prosthesis Mismatch (PPM). This study was undertaken to review our strategy and feasibility of Aortic Root Enlargement (ARE) in patient undergo Double Valve Replacement (DVR) to avoid mismatch without increase in cost of treatment, morbidity or mortality.

Materials and methods

We reviewed 11 patients who underwent double valve replacement along with aortic root enlargement between January 2010 and December 2010. Patients at high risk for PPM and whose aortic annulus did not admit minimum of 19 mm aortic valve were selected for aortic root enlargement. Operative procedure involved extension of aortotomy incision between left and non coronary cusp without entering left atrium and reconstructing the defect with autologous Pericardium and implanting appropriate size valve to avoid or decrease PPM

Results

There were no operative or in hospital mortality. Mean age of patients was 33.83 years (range 12–50). Average body surface area was 1.37 m2 (range 1.1–1.65). Most patients underwent root enlargement for stenotic lesion. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 179 min (range 150–238 min). And mean cross clamp time was 120 min (range 91–155 min). With root enlargement one size bigger valve was replaced in 10 patients and PPM was eliminated in 6 patients while in 5 patient PPM was reduced to moderate level. Other variables like inotropic requirement, duration of ventilation, blood product used and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay were comparable to a routine double valve replacement without root enlargement.

Conclusions

Aortic root enlargement can be safely done even in patients undergoing concomitant aortic and mitral valve replacement. With ARE patients benefit bigger size prosthesis without additional mortality and morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation. 1978;58:20–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1131–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rastan H, Koncz J. Aortoventriculoplasty: a new technique for the treatment of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1976;71:920–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Najafi H, Somers J. Mitral and aortic annular enlargement for insertion of adequate size prosthetic valves. J Card Surg. 1993;8:472–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nicks R, Cartmill T, Bernstein L. Hypoplasia of the aortic root. The problem of aortic valve replacement. Thorax. 1970;25:339–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Manouguian S, Seybold-Epting W. Patch enlargement of the aortic valve ring by extending the aortic incision to the anterior mitral leaflet. New operative technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979;78:402–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sommers KE, David TE. Aortic valve replacement with patch enlargement of the aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:1608–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Carrier M, Pellerin M, Perrault LP, et al. Experience with the 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in the elderly. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:S249–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhong Q, Xiao Y, Chen J, Ma R. Strategy of aortic root enlargement in patients undergoing aortic and mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:782–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Okuyama H, Hashimoto K, Kurosawa H, Tanaka K, Sakamoto Y, Shiratori K. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:869–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nunez L, Aguado MG, Pinto AG, Larrea JL. Enlargement of the aortic annulus by resecting the commissure between the left and noncoronary cusp. Tex Heart Inst J. 1983;10:301–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bortolotti U, Mossuto E, Maraglino G, et al. Annular enlargement during aortic valve replacement: preliminary results with a simplified technique. J Card Surg. 1992;7:235–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Cartier PC, Metras J, Lemieux MD. Patient-prosthesis mismatch can be predicted at the time of operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:S265–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kumar Ravinuthala Venkat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muppiri, V.K., Ali, S.N., Venkat, K.R. et al. Aortic root enlargement in patients undergoing double valve replacement for rheumatic etiology–preliminary results. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 27, 161–164 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-011-0118-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-011-0118-0

Keywords

Navigation