Skip to main content
Log in

Blunt force impact to the head using a teeball bat: systematic comparison of physical and finite element modeling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blunt head trauma secondary to violent actions with various weapons is frequently a cause of injury in forensic casework; differing striking tools have varying degrees of injury capacity. The systematic approach used to examine a 19-year-old student who was beaten with a wooden teeball bat will be described. The assailant stopped beating the student when the teeball bat broke into two pieces. The surviving victim sustained bruises and a forehead laceration. The State’s Attorney assigned a forensic expert to examine whether the forces exerted on the victim’s head (leading to the fracture of the bat) were potentially life threatening (e.g. causing cranial bone fractures). Physical modeling was conducted using a pigskin-covered polyethylene end cap cushioned by cellulose that was connected to a piezoelectric force gauge. Experiments with teeball bats weighing 295–485 g demonstrated that 12–20 kN forces were necessary to cause a comparable bat fracture. In addition to physical testing, a computer-aided simulation was conducted, utilizing a finite-element (FE) method. In the FE approach, after selecting for wood properties, a virtual bat was swung against a hemisphere comprising two layers that represented bone and soft tissue. Employing this model, a 17.6 kN force was calculated, with the highest fracture probability points resembling the fracture patterns of the physically tested bats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thali MJ, Kneubuehl BP, Dirnhofer R. A “skin-skull-brain model” for the biomechanical reconstruction of blunt forces to the human head. Forensic Sci Int. 2002;125:195–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Adamec J, Praxl N, Schneider K, Graw M. Estimation of effective mass of longish rigid instruments in head impacts. Int J Leg Med. 2011;125:763–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharkey EJ, Cassidy M, Brady J, Gilchrist MD, NicDaeid N. Investigation of the force associated with the formation of lacerations and skull fractures. Int J Leg Med. 2012;126:835–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adamec J, Mai V, Graw M, Schneider K, Hempel JM, Schöpfer J. Biomechanics and injury risk of a headbutt. Int J Leg Med. 2013;127:103–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Parmar K, Hainsworth SV, Rutty GN. Quantification of forces required for stabbing with screwdrivers and other blunter instruments. Int J Leg Med. 2012;126:43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roth S, Raul JS, Ludes B, Willinger R. Finite element analysis of impact and shaking inflicted to a child. Int J Leg Med. 2007;121:223–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roth S, Vappou J, Raul JS, Willinger R. Child head injury criteria investigation through numerical simulation of real world trauma. Comput Methods Progr Biomed. 2009;93:32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Raul JS, Roth S, Ludes B, Willinger R. Influence of the benign enlargement of the subarachnoid space on the bridging veins strain during a shaking event: a finite element study. Int J Leg Med. 2008;122:337–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Raul JS, Deck C, Willinger R, Ludes B. Finite-element models of the human head and their applications in forensic practice. Int J Leg Med. 2008;122:359–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rashid B, Destrade M, Gilchrist MD. Mechanical characterization of brain tissue in simple shear at dynamic strain rates. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013;28:71–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamel A, Llari M, Piercecchi-Marti MD, Adalian P, Leonetti G, Thollon L. Effects of fall conditions and biological variability on the mechanism of skull fractures caused by falls. Int J Leg Med. 2013;127:111–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Asgharpour Z, Baumgartner D, Willinger R, Graw M, Peldschus S. The validation and application of a finite element human head model for frontal skull fracture analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;33:16–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li Z, Zou D, Liu N, Zhong L, Shao Y, Wan L, Huang P, Chen Y. Finite element analysis of pedestrian lower limb fractures by direct force: the result of being run over or impact? Forensic Sci Int. 2013;229:43–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tang Z, Tu W, Zhang G, Chen Y, Lei T, Tan Y. Dynamic simulation and preliminary finite element analysis of gunshot wounds to the human mandible. Injury. 2012;43:660–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smart JL, Kaliszan M. Use of a finite element model of heat transport in the human eye to predict time of death. J Forensic Sci. 2013;58(Suppl. 1):s69–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bahill AT, Freitas MM. Two methods for recommending bat weights. Ann Biomed Eng. 1995;23:436–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Saukko P, Knight B. Knight’s forensic pathology. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mattias Kettner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kettner, M., Ramsthaler, F., Potente, S. et al. Blunt force impact to the head using a teeball bat: systematic comparison of physical and finite element modeling. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 10, 513–517 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-014-9586-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-014-9586-z

Keywords

Navigation