Skip to main content
Log in

Instrumentalist Interpretations of Hindu Environmental Ethics

  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many environmental ethicists believe that any adequate environmental ethic should attribute ‘direct moral standing’ (often glossed in terms of intrinsic value) to plants, animals, and the rest of nature. But certain interpretations of Hindu environmental ethics apparently attribute only instrumental value to nature. This places them in direct conflict with the purported adequacy condition on an environmental ethic. So, is such a Hindu ethical view really inadequate? In his recent book Hinduism and Environmental Ethics, Christopher Framarin claims that it is because Hindu instrumentalism about nature is either viciously circular or unacceptably arbitrary. I argue, however, that Framarin’s claim founders in virtue of his misconstruing the logical structure of instrumental value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bradley, B. (1998). Extrinsic value. Philosophical Studies, 91, 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Framarin, C. G. (2014). Hinduism and environmental ethics: law, literature and philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frankena, W. (1973). Ethics (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C. (1983). Two distinctions in goodness. Philosophical Review, 92, 169–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, B. K. (1986). Hindu perspectives on the use of animals in science. In T. Regan (Ed.), Animal sacrifices: religious perspectives on the use of animals in science. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. (1903). Principia ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. (1922). Philosophical studies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, J. (1986). The end of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rønnow-Rasmussen, T. (2002). Instrumental values—strong and weak. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 5, 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rønnow-Rasmussen, T., & Zimmerman, M. J. (Eds.). (2005). Recent work on intrinsic value. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. J. (2001). The nature of intrinsic value. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. J. (2014). Intrinsic vs. extrinsic value. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy < http://plato.stanford.edu > .

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roy W. Perrett.

Additional information

My thanks to two anonymous referees for the journal, who provided a number of helpful suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perrett, R.W. Instrumentalist Interpretations of Hindu Environmental Ethics. SOPHIA 57, 661–668 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-016-0533-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-016-0533-1

Keywords

Navigation