Skip to main content
Log in

Static aerobic composting of municipal sewage sludge with forced ventilation: Using matured compost as bulking conditioner

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Static aerobic composting of municipal sewage sludge with forced ventilation or air ventilation using matured compost as bulking conditioner was investigated. Physical and chemical parameters, e.g., temperature, moisture content, VSS, CODcr, pH, and germination index (GI), were analyzed to characterize the composting process. Fermentation starts quickly in both forced and air ventilation compost heaps and reaches high-temperature stage after 2 d, owing to the bulking function of matured compost. Compared to air ventilation, however, forced ventilation enables the high-temperature stage to last longer for approximately 7 d. The moisture content of both compost bodies decreases from 62% to about 50% as a result of evaporation, and it decreases slightly faster in forced ventilation compost heap after 13 d due to the higher temperature and better ventilation condition. Although no obvious differences of VSS and pH are observed between both compost heaps, the soluble CODCr and GI show differences during the second half period of fermentation. In forced ventilation compost, the soluble CODCr has a small rebound after 13 d, and GI decreases from 46% to 35% but then increases. These results show that in general, the matured compost is a good conditioner and force ventilation with a proper air supply strategy can be more efficient than air ventilation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. RIHANI M, MALAMIS D, BIHAOUI B, ETAHIRI S, LOIZIDOU MASSOBHEI O. In-vessel treatment of urban primary sludge by aerobic composting [J]. Bioresource technology, 2010, 101(15): 5988–5995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. DIAS B O, SILVA C A, HIGASHIKAWA F S, ROIG AS NCHEZ-MONEDERO M A. Use of biochar as bulking agent for the composting of poultry manure: Effect on organic matter degradation and humification [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(4): 1239–1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. GU W, ZHANG F, XU P, TANG S, XIE K, HUANG XHUANG Q. Effects of sulphur and Thiobacillus thioparus on cow manure aerobic composting [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(11): 6529–6535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. HUANG H L, ZENG G M, JIANG R Q, YUAN X Z, YU M, HUANG D L, ZHANG J, CFENG C L. Fluorescence spectroscopy characteristics of humic acid by inoculating white-rot fungus during different phases of agricultural waste composting [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2009, 16: 440–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. NARKHEDE S, ATTARDE SINGLE S. Combined aerobic composting of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge [J]. Global Journal of Environmental Research, 2010, 4(2): 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  6. MARTINS ODEWES T. Loss of nitrogenous compounds during composting of animal wastes [J]. Bioresource Technology, 1992, 42(2): 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. OGUNWANDE G, OSUNADE J, ADEKALU KOGUNJIMI L. Nitrogen loss in chicken litter compost as affected by carbon to nitrogen ratio and turning frequency [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(16): 7495–7503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. TREMIER A, DE GUARDIA A, MASSIANI C, PAUL EMARTEL J. A respirometric method for characterising the organic composition and biodegradation kinetics and the temperature influence on the biodegradation kinetics, for a mixture of sludge and bulking agent to be co-composted [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2005, 96(2): 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ADHIKARI B K, BARRINGTON S, MARTINEZ JKING S. Effectiveness of three bulking agents for food waste composting [J]. Waste Management, 2009, 29(1): 197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. MATHUR S, PATNI NLEVESQUE M. Static pile, passive aeration composting of manure slurries using peat as a bulking agent [J]. Biological Wastes, 1990, 34(4): 323–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. GOYAL S, DHULL SKAPOOR K. Chemical and biological changes during composting of different organic wastes and assessment of compost maturity [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2005, 96(14): 1584–1591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. WU S, YUE Q, QI Y, GAO B, HAN SYUE M. Preparation of ultra-lightweight sludge ceramics (ULSC) and application for pharmaceutical advanced wastewater treatment in a biological aerobic filter (BAF) [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(3): 2296–2300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. KHALIL A, HASSOUNA M, EL-ASHQAR HFAWZI M. Changes in physical, chemical and microbial parameters during the composting of municipal sewage sludge [J]. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2011, 27(10): 2359–2369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. HUA Z, DELONG LLEILEI W. Characteristics of dewatered sewage sludge and green waste co-composting [C]// Digital Manufacturing and Automation (ICDMA), 2011 Second International Conference, 2011: 289–292.

    Google Scholar 

  15. GAJALAKSHMI SABBASI S. Solid waste management by composting: State of the art [J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2008, 38(5): 311–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. BERNAL M, ALBURQUERQUE JMORAL R. Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. A review [J]. Bioresource technology, 2009, 100(22): 5444–5453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. SM RS S, GUSTAFSSON L, BECK-FRIIS BJ NSSON H. Improvement of the composting time for household waste during an initial low pH phase by mesophilic temperature control [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2002, 84(3): 237–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. WANG P, CHANGA C, WATSON M, DICK W, CHEN YHOITINK H. Maturity indices for composted dairy and pig manures [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2004, 36(5): 767–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. WONG J, MAK K, CHAN N, LAM A, FANG M, ZHOU L, WU QLIAO X. Co-composting of soybean residues and leaves in Hong Kong [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2001, 76(2): 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. TIQUIA S, TAM NHODGKISS I. Effects of composting on phytotoxicity of spent pig-manure sawdust litter [J]. Environmental Pollution, 1996, 93(3): 249–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. IGLESIAS JIM NEZ EPEREZ GARCIA V. Evaluation of city refuse compost maturity: A review [J]. Biological Wastes, 1989, 27(2): 115–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. ZUCCONI F, PERA A, FORTE MDE BERTOLDI. Evaluating toxicity of immature compost [J]. Biocycle, 1981, 22(2): 54–57.

    Google Scholar 

  23. BERNAI M, PAREDES C, SANCHEZ-MONEDERO MCEGARRA J. Maturity and stability parameters of composts prepared with a wide range of organic wastes [J]. Bioresource Technology, 1998, 63(1): 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. TANG J-C, MAIE N, TADA YKATAYAMA A. Characterization of the maturing process of cattle manure compost [J]. Process Biochemistry, 2006, 41(2): 380–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. DIAZ S, GRIME J, HARRIS JMCPHERSON E. Evidence of a feedback mechanism limiting plant response to elevated carbon dioxide [J]. Nature, 1993, 364(6438): 616–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhou Shi  (施周).

Additional information

Foundation item: Projects(50978087, 50908081) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ouyang, Jx., Shi, Z., Zhong, H. et al. Static aerobic composting of municipal sewage sludge with forced ventilation: Using matured compost as bulking conditioner. J. Cent. South Univ. 21, 303–309 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-014-1941-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-014-1941-4

Key words

Navigation