Summary
To describe and evaluate a refraction-derived method and a clinically derived method to calculate the correct corneal power for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and to compare the results to the commonly used history-derived method. Retrospective analysis were conducted in consecutive case from clinical practice. For each patient, we established the pre-LASIK and post-LASIK spectacle refraction, the pre-LASIK (Kpre) and post-LASIK K readings (Kpost). We then calculated the pre-and post-LASIK refraction at the corneal plane and the amount of correction obtained by the refraction surgery (ΔSEQco). The cases were divided into two groups. Group I was used to derive two formulas. The values obtained with the two methods were compared with the K by history-derived method (Kc.hd) in group II to validate the results. The K values calculated by using the refraction-derived method (Kc.rd) and the K values calculated using the clinically derived method (Kc.cd) correlated highly with Kc.hd. The correct corneal power for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations after LASIK can use refraction-derived method and clinically derived method instead of history-derived method when some refractive parameters are not available.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Koch D D, Liu J F, Hyde L L et al. Refractive complications of cataract surgery after radial keratometry. Am J Ophthalmol, 1989,108:676–682
Lyle W A, Jin G J. Intraocular lens prediction in patients who undergo cataract surgery following previous radial keratotomy. Arch Opthalmol, 1997,115:457–461.
Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Nguyen N X et al. Underestimation of intraocular lens keratectomy. Ophthalmology, 1999,106:693–702
Gimel H, Sun R, Kaye GB. Refractive error in cataract surgery after previous refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2000,26:142–144
Lesher M P, Schumer D J, Huker D J et al. Phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation after excimer laser photorefrative keratectomy:a case report. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1994,20:265–258
Kalaki R S, Danjoux J P, Fraenkel G E et al. Intraocular lens power calculation for catarac surgery after photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia. J Refract Surg, 1997;13: 362–367.
Feiz V, Mannis M J, Garcia-Ferrer F et al. Intraocular lens power calculation after laser in stiu keratomileusis for myopia and hyperopia:a standardized approach. Cornea, 2001;20:792–797
Holladay J T. IOL calculations following radial keratotomy surgery.Questions and answers. Refract Corneal Surg, 1989;5:36
Shammmas H J. Intraocular lens power calculations. Avoiding the errors. Glendale, CA: News Circle, 1996.117–118
Gimbel H V, Sun R. Accuracy and predictability of intraocular lens power calculations after laser in situ keratomileusis. J cataract Refract Surg, 2001,27:571–576
Shammas H J, Maya C. Correcting the corneal power measurements for intraocular lens power calculations after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Opthalmol, 2003,136:426–432
Chen W, Xu C C, Wang Q M et al. The relationship between 3-dimensional morphological change and clinical diopter after Lasik. Opthalmol Res, (Chinese), 2002,20:49–52
Shammas H J. Intraocular lens power calculations. In: Azar DT, Intraocular lens in cataract and refractive surgery. Philadelphia: WB Sanders, 2001.60–61
Odebthal M T P, Eggink C A, Melles G et al. Clinical and theoretical results of intraoclar lens power calculation for cataract after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. Arch Ophthalmol, 2002,120:431–438.
Hamed A M, Wang L, Misra M et al. A comparative analysis of five methods of determining corneal refractive power in eyes that have undergone myopic laser in situ leratotomileusis. Ophthalmology, 2002;109:651–658.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
LIU Lei, male, born in 1963, Associate Professor
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, L., Dong, J. & Li, X. Correcting the corneal power measurements after myopic laser In Situ keratomileusis. J. Huazhong Univ. Sc. Technol. 26, 472–474 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-006-0425-7
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-006-0425-7