Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hand Replantation with Proximal Row Carpectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
HAND

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to present our operative technique and postoperative results of the hand replantation with proximal row carpectomy in cases of complete amputation at the level of wrist joint. From May 2003 to April 2005, five patients suffered from complete amputation of the hand due to industrial trauma. Amputation level was radiocarpal joint in three cases and midcarpal joint in two cases. Three cases represented guillotine type and two cases with local crush type injuries. All were men and the mean age was 26.6 years. The mean follow-up period was 26.8 months. At the time of replantation, the wrist joint was stabilized with transarticular fixation using three to four Kirschner’s wires after performing proximal row carpectomy. Postoperatively, functional results such as muscle strength, range of motion of the wrist and fingers, and sensory recovery were assessed according to Chen’s criteria. Joint width and arthritic changes of the radio-capitate joint were evaluated with radiologic tools. According to Chen’s criteria, the overall results in five cases were classified as grade II. Intrinsic muscle power of hands was found to be grade 4. The mean grip and pinch powers were 41% and 45%, respectively, compared to contralateral hand. The mean arc of flexion–extension of wrist was 53°. Total mean active motion of fingers was 215 degrees. Static two-point discrimination of fingertip ranged from 8 to 13 mm. On the follow-up, computerized tomography showed well-preserved radio-capitate joint space without any arthritic changes. While performing hand replantation after amputation at the radiocarpal or midcarpal level, proximal row carpectomy is a useful procedure to preserve joint motion of the wrist in selected cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angeles JG, Heminger H, Mass DP. Comparative biomechanical performances of 4-strand core suture repairs for zone II flexor tendon lacerations. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2002;27:508–17. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2002.32619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker H, Orak F, Duponselle E. Early active motion following a beveled technique of flexor tendon repair: report on fifty cases. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1979;4:454–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beris AE, Soucacos PN, Malizos KN, Mitsionis GJ, Soucacos PK. Major limb replantation in children. Microsurgery. 1994;15:474–8. doi:10.1002/micr.1920150708.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cannon DL, Urbaniak JR. Transcarpal and radiocarpal wrist amputation and replantation. In: Watson HK, Weinzweig J, editors. The wrist. 1st ed. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 269–76.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen ZW, Meyer VE, Kleinert HE, Beasley RW. Present indications and contra-indications for replantation as reflected by long-term functional results. Orthop Clin North Am. 1981;12:849–70.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chuang DC, Lai JB, Cheng SL, Jain V, Lin CH, Chen HC. Traction avulsion amputation of the major upper limb: a proposed new classification, guidelines for acute management, and strategies for secondary reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1624–38. doi:10.1097/00006534-200111000-00030.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chung DW, Kim KB, Chun SW. Proximal row carpectomy for management of the post-traumatic arthritis of the carpus. J Korean Soc Surg Hand. 2001;6:69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cupo ME, Sheredos SJ. Clinical evaluation of a new, above-elbow, body-powered prosthetic arm: a final report. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1998;35:431–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. DiDonna ML, Kiefhaber TR, Stem PJ. Proximal row carpectomy: study with a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2359–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Graham B, Adkins P, Tsai TM, Firrell J, Breidenbach WC. Major replantation versus revision amputation and prosthetic fitting in the upper extremity: a late functional outcomes study. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1998;23:783–91. doi:10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80151-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoang NT. Hand replantations following complete amputations at the wrist joint: first experiences in Hanoi, Vietnam. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2006;31:9–17. doi:10.1016/j.jhsb.2005.09.018.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ipsen T, Lundkvist L, Barfred T, Pless J. Principles of evaluation and results in microsurgical treatment of major limb amputations: a follow-up study of 26 consecutive cases 1978–1987. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg. 1990;24:75–80. doi:10.3109/02844319009004524.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jebson PJ, Hayes EP, Engber WD. Proximal row carpectomy: a minimum 10-year follow-up study. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2003;28:561–9. doi:10.1016/S0363–5023(03)00248-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim KC, Ha SH, Lee GJ, Kim JS, Woo SH. Modified Becker’s repair in zone II flexor tendon injury followed by early active mobilization. J Korean Soc Surg Hand. 2004;9:257–61.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kuiken T. Targeted reinnervation for improved prosthetic function. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2006;17:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2005.10.001.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lake C, Dodson R. Progressive upper limb prosthetics. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2006;17:49–72. doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2005.10.004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Malt RA, McKhann CF. The classic Replantation of severed arms. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;133:3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Meyer VE. Hand amputations proximal but close to the wrist joint: prime candidates for reattachment (long-term functional results). J Hand Surg [Am]. 1985;10:989–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pederson WC. Replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:823–41. doi:10.1097/00006534-200103000-00027.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Scheker LR, Chesher SP, Netscher DT, Julliard KN, O’Neill WL. Functional results of dynamic splinting after transmetacarpal, wrist, and distal forearm replantation. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1995;20:584–90. doi:10.1016/S0266-7681(05)80115-9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schuind F, Linscheid RL, An KN, Chao EY. A normal data base of posteroanterior roentgenographic measurements of the wrist. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:1418–29.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith P. Lister’s The hand: Diagnosis and Indications, 4th Ed. London, Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2002. pp 224–226.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tark KC, Kim YW, Lee YH, Lew JD. Replantation and revascularization of hands: clinical analysis and functional results of 261 cases. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1989;14:17–27. doi:10.1016/0363-5023(89)90054-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tomaino MM, Delsignore J, Burton RI. Long-term results following proximal row carpectomy. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1994;19:694–703. doi:10.1016/0363-5023(94)90284-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vanstraelen P, Papini RP, Sykes PJ, Milling MA. The functional results of hand replantation: the Chepstow experience. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1993;18:556–64. doi:10.1016/0266-7681(93)90003-X.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang-Hyun Woo.

About this article

Cite this article

Woo, SH., Lee, YK., Lee, HH. et al. Hand Replantation with Proximal Row Carpectomy. HAND 4, 55–61 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-008-9141-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-008-9141-z

Keywords

Navigation