Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy in early breast cancer using observational data revisited: a propensity score-matched analysis

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Life Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent observational studies showed that breast-conserving surgery (BCS) resulted in superior survival compared to mastectomy in breast cancer patients. This study compared the clinical outcomes of BCS and mastectomy using propensity score (PS) matching analysis, which had advantages over conventional methods in reducing bias. Nonmetastatic breast cancer patients who underwent BCS and mastectomy were matched 1:1 based on their PS. We used the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox-regression model to estimate the treatment effects. A total of 2,866 patients with a median follow-up time of 67 months were included in the original study population. Although the mastectomy cohort (N=1,219) had more advanced disease compared to the BCS cohort (N=1,647), LRFS was similar between the two groups (93.8% vs. 92.4%, P>0.05). BCS (vs. mastectomy) was associated with improved DFS (73.8% vs. 58.7%, P<0.01) and CSS (91% vs. 78.2%, P<0.01) in the original population. In the PS-matched population (N=1,668), clinicopathological features were equally distributed between the two cohorts. BCS (vs. mastectomy) was not associated with improved DFS (70.7% vs. 66.9%, P>0.05) or CSS (87.5% vs. 84.9%, P>0.05). We found that PS methods reduce bias when estimating treatment effects using observational data. BCS and mastectomy show equivalent outcomes in nonmetastatic breast cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdulkarim, B.S., Cuartero, J., Hanson, J., Deschênes, J., Lesniak, D., and Sabri, S. (2011). Increased risk of locoregional recurrence for women with T1-2N0 triple-negative breast cancer treated with modified radical mastectomy without adjuvant radiation therapy compared with breast-conserving therapy. JCO 29, 2852–2858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, S., Pappas, L., Neumayer, L., Kokeny, K., and Agarwal, J. (2014). Effect of breast conservation therapy vs mastectomy on disease-specific survival for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg 149, 267–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Badwe, R., Hawaldar, R., Nair, N., Kaushik, R., Parmar, V., Siddique, S., Budrukkar, A., Mittra, I., and Gupta, S. (2015). Locoregional treatment versus no treatment of the primary tumour in metastatic breast cancer: An open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 16, 1380–1388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Black, D.M., Hunt, K.K., and Mittendorf, E.A. (2013). Long term outcomes reporting the safety of breast conserving therapy compared to mastectomy: 20-year results of EORTC 10801. Gland Surg 2, 120–123.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K., Zeng, Y., Jia, H., Jia, W.J., Yang, H., Rao, N., Song, E., Cox, C. E., and Su, F. (2012). Clinical outcomes of breast-conserving surgery in patients using a modified method for cavity margin assessment. Ann Surg Oncol 19, 3386–3394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K., Liu, J., Zhu, L., Su, F., Song, E., and Jacobs, L.K. (2015). Comparative effectiveness study of breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy in the general population: A NCDB analysis. Oncotarget 6, 40127–40140.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Elze, M.C., Gregson, J., Baber, U., Williamson, E., Sartori, S., Mehran, R., Nichols, M., Stone, G.W., and Pocock, S.J. (2017). Comparison of propensity score methods and covariate adjustment. J Am College Cardiology 69, 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B., Anderson, S., Bryant, J., Margolese, R.G., Deutsch, M., Fisher, E.R., Jeong, J.H., and Wolmark, N. (2002). Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347, 1233–1241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, P., You, L., Wu, D., Shi, A., Miao, Q., Rana, U., Martin, D.P., Du, Y., Zhao, G., Han, B., et al. (2018). Adherence to endocrine therapy among Chinese patients with breast cancer: Current status and recommendations for improvement. PPA 12, 887–897.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann-Johnsen, O.J., Karesen, R., Schlichting, E., and Nygard, J.F. (2015). Survival is better after breast conserving therapy than mastectomy for early stage breast cancer: A registry-based follow-up study of Norwegian women primary operated between 1998 and 2008. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 3836–3845.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Haukoos, J.S., and Lewis, R.J. (2015). The propensity score. JAMA 314, 1637–1638.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, E.S., Lichtensztajn, D.Y., Gomez, S.L., Fowble, B., and Clarke, C. A. (2013). Survival after lumpectomy and mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer. Cancer 119, 1402–1411.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Krall, J.A., Reinhardt, F., Mercury, O.A., Pattabiraman, D.R., Brooks, M. W., Dougan, M., Lambert, A.W., Bierie, B., Ploegh, H.L., Dougan, S. K., et al. (2018). The systemic response to surgery triggers the outgrowth of distant immune-controlled tumors in mouse models of dormancy. Sci Transl Med 10, eaan3464.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, A.M., García-Valdecasas, J.C., Delgado, S., Castells, A., Taurá, P., Piqué, J.M., and Visa, J. (2002). Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: A randomised trial. Lancet 359, 2224–2229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, M., Harris, J.R., and Schnitt, S.J. (2012). Surgical margins in lumpectomy for breast cancer—bigger is not better. N Engl J Med 367, 79–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Onitilo, A.A., Engel, J.M., Stankowski, R.V., and Doi, S.A. (2014). Survival comparisons for breast conserving surgery and mastectomy revisited: Community experience and the role of radiation therapy. Clin Med Res 13, 65–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, S.S.K., Kaptanis, S., Haddow, J.B., Mondani, G., Elsberger, B., Tasoulis, M.K., Obondo, C., Johns, N., Ismail, W., Syed, A., et al. (2017). Current margin practice and effect on re-excision rates following the publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus and ABS consensus guidelines: A national prospective study of 2858 women undergoing breast-conserving therapy in the UK and Ireland. Eur J Cancer 84, 315–324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Maaren, M.C., de Munck, L., de Bock, G.H., Jobsen, J.J., van Dalen, T., Linn, S.C., Poortmans, P., Strobbe, L.J.A., and Siesling, S. (2016). 10 year survival after breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy compared with mastectomy in early breast cancer in the Netherlands: A population-based study. Lancet Oncol 17, 1158–1170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Tienhoven, G., Voogd, A.C., Peterse, J.L., Nielsen, M., Andersen, K. W., Mignolet, F., Sylvester, R., Fentiman, I.S., van der Schueren, E., van Zijl, K., et al. (1999). Prognosis after treatment for loco-regional recurrence after mastectomy or breast conserving therapy in two randomised trials (EORTC 10801 and DBCG-82TM). EORTC breast cancer cooperative group and the Danish breast cancer cooperative group. Eur J Cancer 35, 32–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veronesi, U., Cascinelli, N., Mariani, L., Greco, M., Saccozzi, R., Luini, A., Aguilar, M., and Marubini, E. (2002). Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347, 1227–1232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H., Jia, W., Chen, K., Zeng, Y., Li, S., Jin, L., Wang, L., Song, E., and Su, F. (2012). Cavity margins and lumpectomy margins for pathological assessment: Which is superior in breast-conserving surgery? J Surg Res 178, 751–757.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC1302300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81720108029, 81621004, 81490750), Guangdong Science and Technology Department (2016B030229004), Guangzhou Science Technology and Innovation Commission (201803040015). The research is partly supported by Fountain- Valley Life Sciences Fund of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Education Foundation, and Grant [2013] 163 from the Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Molecular Mechanism and Translational Medicine of the Guangzhou Bureau of Science and Information Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shunrong Li or Erwei Song.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, K., Pan, Z., Zhu, L. et al. Comparison of breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy in early breast cancer using observational data revisited: a propensity score-matched analysis. Sci. China Life Sci. 61, 1528–1536 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-018-9396-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-018-9396-x

Keywords

Navigation