Skip to main content
Log in

Use of rating of perceived exertion for determining plyometric exercises intensity in physically active men

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sport Sciences for Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to use rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale to evaluate popular bilateral plyometric exercise intensities. Fourteen physically active men (age 20.64 ± 1.4 years; height 176.93 ± 6.83 cm; weight 75.28 ± 11.1 kg) volunteered to participate in this study and performed a set of ten repetitions plyometric exercises to depth jump from 35 cm box, 35 cm box jump, depth jump from 60 cm box, 60 cm box jump, pike jump, tuck jump, and squat jump in a session with 5-min rest in between exercises. RPE was measured following the completion of each exercise using 0–10 Borg RPE scale. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and the level of significant was set at p <0.05. The results indicated that squat jump was harder than other types of bilateral plyometric exercises such as 35 cm box jump, depth jump from 35 cm box, and tuck jump (p < 0.05). Moreover, the 35 cm box jump was easier than other plyometric exercises (p < 0.05). With regard to the results of this investigation, it can be recommended that athletes and strength and conditioning professionals use these findings to design plyometric training in their training schedule and keep in their mind that plyometric exercises have different intensities, however, the total volume was matched.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asadi A (2013) Effects of in-season short-term plyometric training on jumping and agility performance of basketball players. Sport Sci Health 9:133–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mirzaei B, Norasteh AA, Asadi A (2013) Neuromuscular adaptation to plyometric training: depth jump versus countermovement jump on sand. Sport Sci Health 9:145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Potach DH, Chu DA (2008) Plyometric training. In: Baechle TR, Erale RW (eds) Essentials of strength training and conditioning. Human Kinetics, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ebben WP, Simenz C, Jensen RL (2008) Evaluation of plyometric intensity using electromyography. J Strength Cond Res 22:861–868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wallace BJ, Kernozek TW, White JM, Wright GA, Huang C (2010) Quantification of vertical ground reaction forces of popular bilateral plyometric exercises. J Strength Cond Res 24:207–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Asadi A (2014) Monitoring plyometric exercise intensity using rating of perceived exertion scale. Phys Act Rev 1:10–15

    Google Scholar 

  7. Noble BJ, Robertson R (1996) Perceived exertion, 1st edn. Human Kinetics, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  8. Singh F, Foster C, Tod D, McGuigan MR (2007) Monitoring different types of resistance training using session rating of perceived exertion. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2:34–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gearhart RF, Goss FL, Lagally KM, Jakici JM, Gallagher J, Robertson RJ (2001) Standardized scaling procedures for rating of perceived exertion during resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res 15:320–325

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Arazi H, Asadi A, Nasehi M, Delpasand A (2012) Cardiovascular and blood lactate responses to an acute plyometric exercise in female volleyball and handball players. Sport Sci Health 8:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eston RG, Lamb KL, Parfitt CG, King N (2005) The validity of predicting maximal oxygen uptake from a perceptually regulated graded exercise test. Eur J Appl Physiol 94:221–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chu DA (1998) Jumping into plyometrics. Human Kinetics, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  13. Day ML, McGuigan MR, Brice G, Foster C (2004) Monitoring exercise intensity during resistance training using the session RPE scale. J Strength Cond Res 2:353–358

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wilmore JH, Costill DL (1994) Physiology of sport and exercise. Human Kinetics, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cafarelli E, Bigland-Ritchie B (1979) Sensation of static force in muscles of different length. Exp Neurol 65:511–525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author gratefully acknowledges the volunteers involved in this study. No sources of funding were sought or awarded for this study and the author reports no conflicts of interest regarding this study.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abbas Asadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Asadi, A. Use of rating of perceived exertion for determining plyometric exercises intensity in physically active men. Sport Sci Health 10, 75–78 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-014-0176-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-014-0176-y

Keywords

Navigation