Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Energy policy, market environment and the economic benefits of enterprises: evidence from China’s petrochemical enterprises

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the external impact of China’s energy policy and market environment changes and the internal impact of internal control and management on the economic benefits of petrochemical enterprises. From 2011 to 2015, China’s energy and economic policies were adjusted, and the market environment underwent major changes. This paper quantifies these two factors into indexes and combines them with the enterprise internal control index to apply them to the economic benefit model of petrochemical enterprises. Regression analysis has been used for positive analysis. The study finds that changes in China’s energy policy have played a guiding, regulating and promoting role in the development of petrochemical enterprises; the more restrictions the market environment imposes on petrochemical enterprises, the fewer economic benefits the petrochemical enterprises receive. Strengthening internal control in petrochemical enterprises can offset some unfavorable factors, and the economic benefits for downstream petrochemical enterprises are better than those for upstream ones. This paper reveals the effects of the energy policy action index, the market environment restriction index and the internal control index on the economic benefits of petrochemical enterprises. The policy recommendations are as follows: governments should improve the market environment and formulate policies that will benefit upstream petrochemical enterprises, especially oil and gas extraction enterprises, by raising product prices and increasing profit margins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chi G (2011) The function orientation and system construction of the internal control index of China’s listed companie. Manag World (06):172–173

  • China Petroleum and Chemical Industry Association (2012) 2011 China Petroleum and Chemical Industry economic operation analysis. Int Pet Econ (1–2):57–65

  • Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2008) VAT may support energy efficiency push in Europe. Manag Environ Qual Int J. https://doi.org/10.1108/meq.2008.08319aab.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Florax RJ, De Groot HL, Mulder P (2011) Improving energy efficiency through technology – trends, investment behaviour and policy design. Manag of Environ Qual Int J 23(4):352

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrón Bozo M (2008) Energy policies in Latin America and the Caribbean and the evolution of sustainability. Int J Energy Sector Manag 2(1):8–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatzert N, Kosub T (2017) Determinants of policy risks of renewable energy investments. Int J Energy Sect Manag 11(1):28–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong Y (2014) On the new normal growth and support the normal growth of the norm. Econ Perspect (11):4–7

  • Jia M, Song X (2009) The global economic crisis and the risk management of China Petroleum Processing Enterprises. Hebei Acad J 29(3):161–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Q (2013) On the definition of government intervention and market regulation. Chin Foreign Entrep (4):257–258

  • Li M, Xu X, Han Z, Chen L (2002) The establishment of the internal operation check system of oil field under the new system. Reform Econ Syst (3):63–65

  • Lin R, Yang Y (2014) The evolution of effective China market reform and monetary policy—analysis based on DSGE model. Manag World (06):39–52, 187

  • Liu B (2012) Problems and countermeasures of ideological and political work in petroleum and petrochemical enterprises. Truth Seek (S1):2

  • Ozoliņa L, Rošā M (2012) A review of energy efficiency policy and measures for industries in Latvia. Manag Environ Qual Int J 23(5):517–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piotr Z (2007) Polish Government policy for coal (1989–2006). Int J Energy Sector Manag 1(3):273–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pušnik M, Sučić B (2014) Integrated and realistic approach to energy planning—a case study of Slovenia. Manag Environ Qual Int J 25(1):30–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Sina Financial (2014) APEC CEO Summit—Xi Jinping keynote speech[EB/OL]. http://finance.sina.com.cn/focus/2014apec. Accessed 08 Nov 2014

  • State Council of China (2011) Energy Development in 12th Five-Year planning[EB/OL]. [23-1-2013]. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-01/23/content_2318554.htm. Accessed 18 Feb 2018

  • Wang Y, Ceng Z (2016) Discussion on safety management of hazardous chemicals in petrochemical enterprises. Petrochem Ind Technol 23(10):193

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng X (2015) Response to market challenges under low oil price of China’s petroleum and petrochemical enterprises. Int Pet Econ 23(12):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Hong C (2014) Asymmetric relationship of international oil price and economic growth in China. China Econ Q 13(2):699–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Zhiping (2016) A review on the economic operation of China’s petroleum and chemical industry in 2015 and a prospect for 2016. Chem Enterp Manag 24(2):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Wang Y (2009) System analysis on the sustainable development of China’s petrochemical enterprise. Sci Technol Manag 11(2):4–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu L (2015) Analysis of the relationship between the economic benefits of coal enterprises and external force and internal funds operation. Resour Sci 37(12):2414–2420

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu L, Huang G, Zhang Y (2014) A research on the trend of Chinese energy structure coal market forced mechanism. Price Theory Practice (3):57–59

  • Zhu L, Zhu X, Zhang W (2016) Determination of downward pressure index of petrochemical enterprises. Stat Decis(14):185–188

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the respected editors and the anonymous referees for their suggestions in this article. Special thanks are given for the financial support provided by the Major Projects of the National Social Science Fund of China (No. 15ZDB163), the Top-notch Academic Programs Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (No. PPZY2015C227), the Business Administration First Class Built Subject of Jiangsu Province in the 13th Five-Year (No. SJY201609) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71573255).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xueyi Zhu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, L., Zhu, X. Energy policy, market environment and the economic benefits of enterprises: evidence from China’s petrochemical enterprises. Nat Hazards 95, 113–127 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03579-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03579-3

Keywords

Navigation