Abstract
1:1 laptop programs, in which every student is provided with a personal computer to use during the school year, permit increased and routine use of powerful, user-friendly computer-based tools. Growing numbers of 1:1 programs are reshaping the roles of teachers and learners in science classrooms. At the Denver School of Science and Technology, a public charter high school where a large percentage of students come from low-income families, 1:1 laptops are used often by teachers and students. This article describes the school’s use of laptops, the Internet, and related digital tools, especially for teaching and learning physics. The data are from teacher and student surveys, interviews, classroom observations, and document analyses. Physics students and teachers use an interactive digital textbook; Internet-based simulations (some developed by a Nobel Prize winner); word processors; digital drop boxes; email; formative electronic assessments; computer-based and stand-alone graphing calculators; probes and associated software; and digital video cameras to explore hypotheses, collaborate, engage in scientific inquiry, and to identify strengths and weaknesses of students’ understanding of physics. Technology provides students at DSST with high-quality tools to explore scientific concepts and the experiences of teachers and students illustrate effective uses of digital technology for high school physics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adelman N, Donnelly MB, Dove T, Tiffany-Morales J, Wayne A, Zucker A (2002) The integrated studies of educational technology: professional development and teachers’ uses of technology. U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC
American Educational Research Association (2007) Research points: science education that makes sense, vol 5, issue 1. Author, Washington, DC
Bayraktar S (2001) A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in science education. J Res Technol Educ 34(2):173–188
Bell R, Gess-Newsome J, Luft J (eds) (2007) Technology in the secondary science classroom. National Science Teachers Association, Arlington, VA
Bonifaz A, Zucker A (2004) Lessons learned about providing laptops to all students. EDC and NEIRTEC, Newton, MA
Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res 18:32–42
CDW-G (2006) Teachers talk tech 2006: fulfilling technology’s promise of improved student performance. Retrieved July 21, 2006. http://newsroom.cdwg.com/features/TeachersTalkTech2006Results.pdf
Cuban L (2001) Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Cuban L, Kirkpatrick H, Peck C (2001) High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: explaining an apparent paradox. Am Educ Res J 38(4):813–834. doi:10.3102/00028312038004813
Lemke J (1990) Talking science: language, learning and values. Ablex, Norwood, NJ
Linn MC (2003) Technology and science education: starting points, research programs, and trends. Int J Sci Educ 25(6):727–758. doi:10.1080/09500690305017
Linn MC, Lee H-S, Tinker R, Husic F, Chiu JL (2006) Inquiry learning: teaching and assessing knowledge integration in science. Science 313(5790):1049–1050. doi:10.1126/science.1131408
National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Oppenheimer T (2003) The flickering mind: the false promise of technology in the classroom and how learning can be saved. Random House, New York
Penuel W (2005) Research: what it says about 1 to 1 learning. Apple Computer
Rockman S (2003) Learning from laptops. Threshold 1(1):24–28
Russell M, Bebell D, Higgins J (2004) Laptop learning: a comparison of teaching and learning in upper elementary classrooms equipped with shared carts of laptops and permanent 1:1 laptops. J Educ Comput Res 30(4):313–330. doi:10.2190/6E7K-F57M-6UY6-QAJJ
Warren B, Rosebery A (1996) This question is just too, too easy: perspectives from the classroom on accountability in science. In: Schauble L, Glaser R (eds) Contributions of instructional innovation to understanding learning. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 97–125
Warschauer M (2006) Laptops and literacy: learning in the wireless classroom. Teachers College Press, New York
Zucker AA (2004) Developing a research agenda for ubiquitous computing in schools. J Educ Comput Res 30(4):349–364. doi:10.2190/BYR8-CGFC-WVHV-T0TL
Zucker AA (2008) Transforming schools with technology: how smart use of digital tools helps achieve six key education goals. Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, MA
Zucker AA, Hug ST (2007) A study of the 1:1 laptop program at the Denver School of Science and Technology. Denver School of Science and Technology, Denver, CO. Available at http://scienceandtech.org/documents/Technology/DSST_Laptop_Study_Report.pdf
Zucker AA, McGhee R (2005) A study of one-to-one computer use in mathematics and science instruction at the secondary level in Henrico County Public Schools. SRI International, Menlo Park, CA. Available at http://www.ubiqcomputing.org/FinalReport.pdf
Zucker AA, Tinker RF, Staudt C, Mansfield A, Metcalf S (2008) Learning science in grades 3–8 using probeware and computers: findings from the TEEMSS II project. J Sci Educ Technol 17(1):42–48. doi:10.1007/s10956-007-9086-y
Acknowledgments
Funding for studying DSST’s 1:1 laptop program was provided by the Colorado Children’s Campaign through a grant awarded to the Denver School of Science and Technology. The authors gratefully acknowledge that support as well as the cooperation of the hundreds of teachers, students, administrators, and trustees whose assistance made the study possible.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zucker, A.A., Hug, S.T. Teaching and Learning Physics in a 1:1 Laptop School. J Sci Educ Technol 17, 586–594 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9125-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9125-3