Abstract
This paper presents an overview of contemporary sociological issues in fire safety. The most obviously social aspects of fire safety—those that relate to the socioeconomic distribution of fire casualties and damage—are discussed first. The means that society uses to mitigate fire risks through regulation are treated next; focusing on the shift towards fire engineered solutions and the particular challenges this poses for the social distribution and communication of fire safety knowledge and expertise. Finally, the social construction of fire safety knowledge is discussed, raising questions about whether the confidence in the application of this knowledge by the full range of participants in the fire safety design and approvals process is always justified, given the specific assumptions involved in both the production of the knowledge and its extension to applications significantly removed from the original knowledge production; and the requisite competence that is therefore needed to apply this knowledge. The overarching objective is to argue that the fire safety professions ought to be more reflexive and informed about the nature of the knowledge and expertise that they develop and apply, and to suggest that fire safety scientists and engineers ought to actively collaborate with social scientists in research designed to study the way people interact with fire safety technology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
FEMA (2011) Fire death rate trends: an international perspective, Topical Fire Report Series, 12(8), https://www.usfa.fema.gov/downloads/pdf/statistics/v12i8.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2016
Bijker W, Hughes T, Pinch T (eds) (1988) The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. MIT Press, Cambridge
Bijker W, Law J (eds) (1992) Shaping technology/building society. MIT Press, Cambridge
MacKenzie D, Wajcman J (eds) (1999) The social shaping of technology, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Buckingham (1st edition 1985)
Latour B, Woolgar S [1986 (1979)] Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Barnes B, Bloor D, Henry J (1996) Scientific knowledge: a sociological analysis. Athlone and Chicago University Press, London
Collins H, Pinch T (2014) The Golem at large: what you should know about technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bullock M, Monaghan A (2014) The development of competency in fire engineering. Int Fire Prof 7:14–17
[9] Jennings CR (1999) Socioeconomic characteristics and their relationship to fire incidence: a review of the literature. Fire Technol 35(1):7–34
Department for Communities and Local Government (2012) Fire Statistics Great Britain April 2013 to March 2014. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/456652/Fire_Statistics_Great_Britain_2013-14___PDF_Version_.pdf Accessed 4 Nov 2015
Department of Transport (2014) Reported Road Casualties in Great Britain: Main Results 2014. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/reported-road-casualties-in-great-britain-main-results-2014 Accessed 4 Jan 2016
The Scottish Government (2012) Fire Statistics Scotland, 2011–2012. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/0040/00403593.pdf. Accessed 15 Sep 2014
Ahrens M (2014) Smoke alarms in US home fires. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy
Haynes HJG (2015) Fire Loss in the United States During 2014. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy
Federal Emergency Management Agency (1997) Socioeconomic factors and the incidence of fire. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC
Neavling S (2013) As Detroit breaks down, scourge of arson burns out of control. Reuters (July 13 2013)
http://www.clevelandfire.gov.uk/news-and-events/campaigns/arson-prevention/. Accessed 21 Aug 2013
Palmer EJ, Caulfield LS, Hollin CR (2007) Interventions with arsonists and young fire setters: a survey of the national picture in England and Wales’. Legal Criminol Psychol 12:101–116
[19] Wolski A, Dembsey NA, Meacham BJ (2000) Accommodating perceptions of risk in performance-based building fire safety code development. Fire Saf J 34(3):297–309
[20] Meacham BJ (2010) Risk‐informed performance‐based approach to building regulation. J Risk Res 13(7):877–893
Health & Safety Executive (1988) The tolerability of risk from nuclear power stations, HMSO, London (revised 1992)
Fraser-Mitchell J, Williams C (2012) Cost benefit analysis of residential sprinklers for Wales—Report of cost benefit analysis, BRE Global, 27 April
[23] Roberts H, Curtis K, Liabo K, Rowland D, DiGuiseppi C, Roberts I (2004) Putting public health evidence into practice: increasing the prevalence of working smoke alarms in disadvantaged inner city housing. J Epidemical Commun Health 58:280–285
Duncan C, Wade C (2011) Cost-effective domestic fire sprinkler systems. BRANZ Conference Paper 91. In: Presented at the CIB World Building Congress
UK National Archives file SP 9/171
Ross L (2012) Invitation and escape: technical standards and tacit knowledge in the design studio. In E. de Vos (ed.) Theory by design: architectural research made explicit in the design teaching studio. ASP, Antwerp
Cullen WD (1990) The public inquiry into the Piper Alpha disaster. HM Stationery Office, London
Fennell D (1988) Investigation into the King’s cross underground fire. Department of Transport, London
The Stationery Office Limited (2010) Schedule 1, Part 2 of Building and Buildings, England and Wales, The Building Regulations, UK http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2010/2214/pdfs/uksi_20102214_en.pdf Accessed 4th Jan 2016
Hansen G, Condon E (1989) Denial of disaster. Cameron & Company, San Francisco
Branner JC (1913) Earthquakes and structural engineering. Bull Seismol Soc Am 3(1):1–5
Fradkin PL (2005) The great earthquake and firestorms of 1906: how San Francisco nearly destroyed itself. University of California Press, Berkeley, p. 244
Drysdale D (2010) The origins of fire safety engineering in the UK. http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/FIRESEAT/files10/Slides_FIRESEAT2010_Drysdale.pdf. Accessed 15 Sep 2014
International Civil Aviation Organization (2001) Annex 13 to the convention on international civil aviation aircraft accident and incident investigation, http://www.emsa.europa.eu/retro/Docs/marine_casualties/annex_13.pdf
Caird RG (1996) Fire safety engineering: role in performance-based codes. In: 3rd Asia-Oceania Symposium on Fire Science and Technology
Meacham BJ (1996) The evolution of performance-based codes and fire safety design methods. National Institute of Standards and Technology, http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/fire98/PDF/f98125.pdf. Accessed 15 Sep 2014
[37] Department of Communities and Local Government (2010) Approved Document B, Building Regulations 2010. HM Government, London
Law M, Beever P (1995) Magic numbers and golden rules. Fire Technol 31(1):77–83
[39] Albano JM, Fitzgerald L, Meacham BJ (2006) Performance-based structural fire safety. J Perform Constr Facil 20(1):45–53
Meacham BJ, Bowen R, Traw J, Moore A (2005) Performance-based building regulation: current situation and future needs. Build Res Inf 33(2):91–106
May PJ (2007) Regulatory regimes and accountability. Regul Gov 1:8–26
[42] Alvarez A, Meacham BJ, Dembsey NA, Thomas JR (2013) Twenty years of performance based fire protection design: challenges faced and a look ahead. J Fire Prot Eng 23(4):249–276
Lewis K (2004) A world apart? http://www.building.co.uk/Story.aspx?storyCode=3042560. Accessed 20 Dec 2014
[44] Downer J (2010) Trust and technology: the social foundations of aviation regulation. Br J Sociol 61(1):83–106
[45] Downer J (2011) On audits and airplanes: redundancy and reliability-assessment in high technologies. Acc Organ Soc 36:269–283
Bullock M, Monaghan A (2012) The development of competency in fire engineering. Int Fire Prof 2012(7):14–17
Fleischmann CM (2011) Is prescription the future of performance-based design? Fire Saf Sci 10:77–94
International Code Council (2015) International Building Code. http://codes.iccsafe.org/app/book/content/2015-I-Codes/2015%20IBC%20HTML/Chapter%201.html
Ferreira MJ, Rosenbaum ER, Ballard MS, Schultheis B (2002) UBC Section 905.0—Smoke Control, A Case Study of the Implementation of Performance-Based Building Codes in the United States. In: 4th International Conference on Performance-Based Codes and Fire Safety
Wade C, Beever P, Fleischmann CM, Lester J, Llyodd D, Moule A, Saunders N, Thorby P (2007) Developing Fire Performance Criteria for New Zealand’s Performance Based Building Code. In: Paper presented at the Fire Safety Engineering International Seminar, 26–27 April, Paris, France. http://www.branz.co.nz/cms_show_download.php?id=f8f5f396ba47ccae10e62e5c335d917d4d9301c0 Accessed 14 Sep 2014
Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (2013) C/VM2, Verification method: framework for fire safety design
Beever P (2013) Presentation at the Lloyd’s Register Foundation/University of Edinburgh Seminar in Fire Safety Engineering, Gullane, Scotland, 30 April 2013
Davies C (1991) May: How it was built. Archit Rev
Bullock M, Monaghan A (2014) Code compliance or fire engineering for safety design—have we moved on? Int Fire Prof 8:25–28
Bullock M, Monaghan A (2014) Shouldering the responsibility. Int Fire Prof 9:29–32
Bullock M, Monaghan A (2014) Have you got the time? Int Fire Prof 10:33–36
Sachs EO (1903) Suggested Standards of Fire Resistance. In: Woolson IH (ed) Report of the Proceedings of the International Fire Protection Congress, pp. 243–248
Woolson IH (1903) Report of the Proceedings of the International Fire Protection Congress, London
Babrauskas V, Williamson RB (1978) The historical basis of fire resistance testing—Part I. Fire Technol 14(3):184–194
[60] Babrauskas V, Williamson RB (1978) The historical basis of fire resistance testing—Part II. Fire Technol 14(4):304–316
Wessel R, Gardner M (2004) What do fire resistance ratings really mean? The Construction Specifier, pp 46–52
Rakic J (2014) Understanding fire ratings, http://www.pfpa.com.au/docs/Fire%20ratings/rakic_understanding_fire_ratings.pdf?phpMyAdmin=ZlesLyIQHdlTOtrt-8XBatCVvU6. Accessed 14 Sep 2014
Harmathy TZ, Lie TT (1970) Fire Test Standard in the Light of Fire Research, Fire Test Performance—ASTM STP 464. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia
Law M (1981) Designing fire safety for steel—recent work. In: Proceedings of the ASCE Spring Convention. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York
Maluk C, Bisby LA, Krajcovic M, Torero JL (2015) The heat-transfer rate inducing system (H-TRIS) test method, Fire Saf J (submitted March)
Beyler C, Beitel J, Iwankiw N, Lattimer B (2007) Fire resistance testing for performance based design of buildings. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg
BS EN 1991-1-2 (2002) Eurocode 1: Actions on structures—Part 1–2: General actions—Actions on structures exposed to fire.
Reddaway TF (1940) The Rebuilding of London after the Great Fire (Jonathan Cape)
Rasbash D (1974) Inaugural Lecture at the University of Edinburgh. https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/5574
[70] Emmons HW (1985) The further history of fire science. Fire Technol 21(3):230–238
Drysdale DD (1985) An introduction to fire dynamics. Wiley, Chichester
Quintiere JG (1997) Principles of fire behaviour. Thomson, Albany
Buc EC (2008) Fire testing and fire reality: what do fire tests really tell us about materials? http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/FIRESEAT/files08/06-Buc.pdf. Accessed 14 Sep 2014
Lennon T (no date) BRE Cardington Steel Framed Building Fire Tests, The Building Research Establishment, UK, http://data.bre.co.uk/dataset/8296db4d-4a80-4a32-ae09-00821678e6ee/resource/bc6bc291-4ab5-498a-8ee2-8726402f1d21/download/BRE-Cardington-Steel-Framed-Building-Fire-Tests-SM.pdf Accessed 12 June 2016
Lamont S (2001) The Behaviour of Multi-story Composite Steel Framed Structures in Response to Compartment Fires. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK
Wang Y, Burgess I, Wald F, Gillie M (2013) Performance-based fire engineering of structures. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Collette KA (2007) Comparisons of structural design fires. M.Sc. thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester
Rein G, Torero JL, Jahn W, Stern-Gottfried J, Ryder NL, Desanghere S, Lazaro M, Mowrer F, Coles A, Joyeux D, Alvear D, Capote JA, Jowsey A, Abecassis-Empis C, Reszka P (2009) Round-robin study of a priori modelling predictions of the Dalmarnock Fire Test One. Fire Saf J 44:590–602
Johansson N (2015) ‘User Impact on FDS simulations: Reflections Based on the Results from a Round-Robin Study’ at the SFPE conference, Copenhagen, June 4–5. http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.sfpe.org/resource/resmgr/2015_Europe_Presentations/Fri_PM_GS.pdf
MacKenzie D, Rüdig W, Spinardi G (1988) Social research on technology and the policy agenda: an example from the strategic arms race. In: Brian Elliot B (ed), Technology and social process. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
Spearpoint M, MacLennan HA (2012) The effect of an ageing and less fit population on the ability of people to egress buildings. Saf Sci 50:1675–1684
[82] Ronchi E, Nilsson D (2013) Fire evacuation in high-rise buildings: a review of human behaviour and modelling research. Fire Sci Rev 2:7
May PJ (2003) Performance-based regulation and regulatory regimes: the Saga of leaky buildings. Law Policy 25(4):381–401
Acknowledgments
Many of the ideas leading to this paper originated from The 2013 Lloyd’s Register Foundation Global Technical Leadership Seminar in Fire Safety Engineering, held in Gullane, Scotland. The Seminar was majority funded by The Lloyd’s Register Foundation (LRF). The authors would like to acknowledge the intellectual contributions the Seminar participants, as well as the in-kind support provided by their respective organizations in allowing them to attend. We are grateful for the support of The Royal Academy of Engineering.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spinardi, G., Bisby, L. & Torero, J. A Review of Sociological Issues in Fire Safety Regulation. Fire Technol 53, 1011–1037 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-016-0615-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-016-0615-1