Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Feminism and Penal Expansion: The Role of Rights-Based Criminal Law in Post-Neoliberal Ecuador

  • Published:
Feminist Legal Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article analyses feminist discourses on the criminalisation of violence against women in Ecuador, after the enactment of a “post-neoliberal” constitution. It responds to arguments in feminist legal theory, which affirm that penal expansion thrives through neoliberal globalisation, and that certain feminists have sponsored this carceral-neoliberal alliance, over and above redistributive concerns. However, in Ecuador, many feminists who participated in a recent criminalisation process also endorsed the post-neoliberal government’s social redistribution programme. Ecuadorian feminism therefore complicates current discussions on carceral and governance feminism, which link penal expansion with neoliberalism and an absence of redistributive concerns. Ecuadorian left-leaning feminists use rights-based frameworks to reconcile penal interventions with potential abuses of coercive power. This allows them to regard criminal justice as minimally problematic within the redistributive agenda they endorse. At the same time, the penal approach of Ecuadorian feminists runs the danger of marginalising legally pluralistic approaches to justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Clip available online at https://youtu.be/NTxUWQ2IE6s. Accessed 26 July 2018.

  2. The term, coined by John Williamson in 1990, refers to free market measures settled amongst Latin American and U.S. policymakers. To critics of neoliberalism, it involved U.S. imposition of structural adjustment, reduced social service provision, and the opening up of capital markets (Bedford 2009; Serra et al. 2008, 3–13).

  3. Some Latin American countries like Argentina, Bolivia, Brasil, Ecuador, Nicaragua, Uruguay and Venezuela, have been referred to as the “pink tide” (Kampwirth 2011), “new left”, or “post-neoliberal” (Borón 2003, 192), alluding to an approach that is not “socialist enough” to be considered “red”. Although some countries have recently moved back to right-leaning governments, the leftist programmes are still referred to as “socialism of the 21st century” (Dieterich 2009).

  4. In this article, I use “penality”, to refer to the whole of the penal complex, including laws, procedures and sanctions (Howe 1994; Foucault 1977; Garland 1985).

  5. Although Ecuador has lower incarceration rates than other Latin American countries, a 42% overpopulation has been estimated in prisons (El Telégrafo 2017). In addition, the rates of individuals imprisoned for particular crimes, such as drug trafficking doubled during 2017 alone (El Comercio 2017).

  6. Contemporary Andean thought is syncretic and presented in diverse ways (Estermann 1998). This article refers the concepts as they were incorporated into the 2008 Constitution.

  7. For example, the Beijing processes are indicative of the incorporation of Latin American feminists to international agencies and transnational NGOs. Also, in 1994, the OAS adopted the first VAW international treaty in the world: the Convention on the Prevention, Punishment and Eradication of Violence Against Women, known as “Belem Do Pará Convention”. Most Latin American laws on VAW resort to Belem do Para as a legal and conceptual foundation.

  8. Specialised Laws on domestic violence were enacted in Peru in 1993 and 1997; Chile and Argentina in 1994; Bolivia in 1995, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala and Mexico in 1996; and Venezuela in 1998 (Wilson 2013, 3–18).

  9. Development is defined as “the organised, sustainable and dynamic group of political, socio-cultural and environmental systems which underpin the achievement of the good living, the sumak kawsay” (Constitución de la República del Ecuador, Art. 275).

  10. This term, which translates approximately into “historical woman”, was used by most interviewees to refer to veteran feminist activists.

References

  • Ávila, Ramiro. 2009. Anteproyecto De Código De Garantías Penales. Quito: Ministerio de justicia y derechos humanos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ávila, Ramiro. 2012. Debe Aprender El Derecho Penal Estatal De La Justicia Indígena? In Justicia Indígena, Plurinacionalidad e Interculturalidad En Ecuador, ed. Boaventura de Sousa Santos and Agustín Grijalva, 279–304. La Paz: Abya Yala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ávila, Ramiro. 2013. La (in)Justicia Penal En La Democracia Constitucional De Derechos. Ediciones Legales: Una Mirada Desde El Garantismo Penal. Quito.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, Carol Lee. 2005. Discourse, Discourse Everywhere: Subject “agency” in Feminist Discourse Methodology. Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies 13(3): 198–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, Kate. 2009. Developing Partnerships: Gender, Sexuality, and the Reformed World Bank. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, Russell, and Gery Ryan. 2009. Analyzing Qualitative Data: Systematic Approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Elizabeth. 2007. The Sexual Politics of the “New Abolitionism”. Differences 18(3): 128–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Elizabeth. 2012. Carceral Politics as Gender Justice? the “Traffic in Women” and Neoliberal Circuits of Crime, Sex, and Rights. Theory and Society 41(3): 233–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borón, Atilio. 2003. El Pos-Neoliberalismo: Un Proyecto En Construcción. In La Trama Del Neoliberalismo. Mercado, Crisis y Exclusión Social, ed. Emir Sader and Pablo Gentili, 78–83. Buenos Aires: Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumiller, Kristin. 2008. In An Abusive State: How Neoliberalism Appropriated the Feminist Movement Against Sexual Violence. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, Nils. 2000. Crime Control as Industry. Towards Gulags, Western Style. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comisión Especializada Permanente de Justicia y Estructura del Estado. 2012. Informe Para Primer Debate. Proyecto De Código Orgánico Integral Penal. Quito: Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa, Rafael. 2011. Conferencia Magistral Del Economista Rafael Correa Delgado En La Universidad De Buenos Aires. http://www.presidencia.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/10/031210_Conferencia-Magistral-dictada-por-el-Presidente-en-la-UBA.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2018.

  • Corrigan, Rose. 2013. Up Against a Wall: Rape Reform and the Failure of Success. New York and London: NYU Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cucurí, Cristina. 2009. El Acceso De Las Mujeres Indígenas a La Justicia En La Nueva Constitución Del Ecuador. In Mujeres Indígenas y Justicia Ancestral, ed. Miriam Lang and Ana Kucia, 132–135. Quito: UNIFEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dávalos, Pablo. 2014. Alianza País o La Reinvención Del Poder. Quito: Ediciones desde abajo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dávalos, Pablo. 2008. El Sumak Kawsay (Buen Vivir) y Las Cesuras Del Desarrollo. América Latina En Movimiento, 6. https://www.alainet.org/es/active/23920. Accessed 26 July 2018.

  • Dean, Carolyn. 2001. Andean Androgyny and the Making of Men. In Gender in Pre-Hispanic America, ed. Cecilia F. Klein, 143–177. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieterich, Heinz. 2009. El Gran Salto Adelante Del Socialismo Del Siglo XXI. Rebellion 11. http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=82091. Accessed 26 July 2018.

  • Dubber, Markus Dirk. 2004. Toward a Constitutional Law of Crime and Punishment. Hastings Law Journal 55: 1–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Comercio. 2017. El Doble De Presos Por Drogas En 15 Meses, Reformas Incidieron En El Incremento. http://www.elcomercio.com/actualidad/ecuador-presos-drogas-justicia-microtrafico.html. Accessed 26 July 2018.

  • El Telégrafo. Un 42% De Hacinamiento Existe En Los Centros Penitenciarios De Ecuador. https://www.eltelegrafo.com.ec/noticias/39/13/un-42-de-hacinamiento-existe-en-los-centros-penitenciarios-de-ecuador. Accessed 26 July 2018.

  • El Universo. 2012. Anunziatta Valdez: ‘Las Mujeres Violentadas Quedan Desprotegidas Con Proyecto Penal’. http://www.eluniverso.com/2012/07/10/1/1355/anunziatta-valdez-las-mujeres-violentadas-quedan-desprotegidas-proyecto-penal.html. Accessed 26 July 2018.

  • El Universo. 2014. Nuevos Delitos En Código Penal. https://www.eluniverso.com/noticias/2014/08/03/nota/3308676/nuevos-delitos-codigo-penal. Accessed 26 July 2018.

  • Mujeres. http://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/violencia-degenero/. Accessed 26 July 2018.

  • Endara, Ximena. 1999. Modernización Del Estado y Reforma Jurídica, Ecuador 1992–1996. Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estermann, Josef. 1998. Filosofía Andina: Estudio Intercultural De La Sabiduría Autóctona Andina. Quito: Abya-Yala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrajoli, Luigi. 1995. Derecho y Razón. Teoría Del Garantismo Penal, vol. 2. Madrid: Editorial Trotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, Peter. 2014. The Revolutionary Past: Decolonizing Law and Human Rights. Metodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy 2: 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, David. 1985. Punishment and Welfare: A History of Penal Strategies. UK: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, David. 2012. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grugel, Jean, and Pía Riggirozzi. 2012. Post-neoliberalism in Latin America: Rebuilding and Reclaiming the State After Crisis. Development and Change 43: 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudynas, Eduardo, and Alberto Acosta. 2011. El Buen Vivir o La Disolución De La Idea Del Progreso. In La Medición Del Progreso y Del Bienestar. Propuestas Desde América Latina, ed. Mariano Rojas, 103–110. Mexico DF: Foro Consultivo, Científico y Tecnológico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halley, Janet. 2008. Rape at Rome: Feminist Interventions in the Criminalisation of Sex Related Violence in Positive International Criminal Law. Michigan Journal of International Law 30: 1–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halley, Janet, Prabha Kotiswaran, Hila Shamir, and Chantal Thomas. 2006. From the International to the Local in Feminist Legal Responses to Rape, Prostitution/Sex Work, and Sex Trafficking: Four Studies in Contemporary Governance Feminism. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender 29: 335–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halley, Janet, Prabha Kotiswaran, Hila Shamir, and Rachel Rebouché. 2018. Governance Feminism: An Introduction. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haney, Lynne A. 2010. Working through Mass Incarceration: Gender and the Politics of Prison Labor from East to West. Signs 36: 73–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, Adrian. 1994. Punish and Critique. Towards a Feminist Analysis of Penality. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • INEC. 2012. Encuesta Nacional De Relaciones Familiares y Violencia De Género Contra Las. Quito: INEC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampwirth, Karen. 2011. Latin America’s New Left and the Politics of Gender: Lessons from Nicaragua. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lagarde, Marcela. 2010. Preface: Feminist Keys to Understanding Feminicide. In Terrorizing Women: Feminicide in the Americas, ed. Rosa-Linda Fregoso and Cynthia Bejarano, xi–xxv. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron, Genevieve, and Adrienne Roberts. 2010. Toward a Feminist Political Economy of Capitalism and Carcerality. Signs 36: 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, Amy, and Christine Keating. 2013. Navigating the Left Turn: Sexual Justice and the Citizen Revolution in Ecuador. International Feminist Journal of Politics 15: 515–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugones, María. 2007. Heterosexualism and the colonial/modern Gender System. Hypatia 22(1): 186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugones, María. 2009. Hacia Una Lectura Decolonial De Chacha-Warmi. Reunión Annual De Etnología II: 153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugones, María. 2010. Toward a Decolonial Feminism. Hypatia 25: 742–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Movimiento de Mujeres del Ecuador. 2008. Agenda De Las Mujeres Para La Nueva Constitución Ecuatoriana. Quito: UNIFEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksala, Johanna. 2013. Feminism and Neoliberal Governmentality. Foucault Studies 16: 32–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ospina, Pablo. 2009. Historia De Un Desencuentro: Rafael Correa y Los Movimientos Sociales En El Ecuador (2007–2008). In Repensar La Política Desde América Latina. Cultura, Estado y Movimientos Sociales, ed. Raphael Hoetmer, 195–218. Lima: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paladines, Jorge Vicente. 2014. Feminismo Punitivo: Cuando El Género Se Redujo Al Castigo. http://www.pensamientopenal.com.ar/doctrina/40015-feminismo-punitivo-cuando-genero-se-redujo-al-castigo. Accessed 26 Julio 2018.

  • Quintero López, Rafael. 2008. La Constitución De 2008.Un Análisis Político. Abya-Yala: Quito.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe, Sarah A. 2012. Development for a Postneoliberal Era? Sumak Kawsay, Living Well and the Limits to Decolonisation in Ecuador. Geoforum 43(2): 240–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez Gallegos, Franklin. 2010. Desencuentros, Convergencias, Polarización (y Viceversa). El Gobierno Ecuatoriano y Los Movimientos Sociales. Nueva Sociedad 227: 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodas Morales, Raquel. 2007. Estudio Introductorio. In Las Propias y Los Ajenos. Miradas Críticas Sobre Los Discursos Del Movimiento De Mujeres Del Ecuador, ed. Raquel Rodas Morales, 9. Quito: FIG, ACDI, CONAMU, Abya-Yala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romo, María Paula. 2012. Informe De Minoría Para Primer Debate. Proyecto De Código Orgánico Integral Penal. Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador: Quito.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosero, Rocío. 2007. Las Mujeres Ecuatorianas, La Constituyente y La Constitución.”. La Tendencia 5: 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2010a. Hablamos Del Socialismo Del Buen Vivir. América Latina En Movimiento 452: 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2010b. Para Una Democracia De Alta Intensidad. Ecuador Debate 80: 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra, Narcis, Shari Spiegel, and Joseph E. Stiglitz. 2008. Introduction: From the Washington Consensus Towards a New Global Governance. In The Washington Consensus Reconsidered. Towards a New Global Governance, ed. Narcis Serra and Joseph E. Stiglitz, 3–13. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Jonathan. 1998. Managing the Monstrous: Sex Offenders and the New Penology. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 4 (1–2): 452–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Jonathan. 2007. Governing through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snider, Laureen. 1998. Towards Safer Societies: Punishment, Masculinities and Violence Against Women. British Journal of Criminology 38(1): 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sozzo, Máximo. 2015. ¿Más allá Del Neoliberalismo? Cambio Político y Penalidad En América Del Sur. Cuadernos Del Pensamiento Crítico Latinoamericano 23: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoler, Ann Laura. 1995. Race and the Education of Desire: Foucault’s History of Sexuality and the Colonial Order of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudbury, Julia (ed.). 2005. Global Lockdown: Race, Gender, and the Prison-Industrial Complex. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallejo Jiménez, Geovana. 2011. En Busca De Otro Derecho Penal. Opinión Jurídica 10(19): 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vela, María Pilar. 2006. Estrategias Del Movimiento De Mujeres Del Ecuador Para La Incorporación De Sus Derechos En La Constitución Política De 1998. In Reformas Constitucionales y Equidad De Género, ed. Sonia Montaño and Verónica Aranda, 263–268. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villagómez, Gayne. 2013. La Revolución Ciudadana y Las Demandas De Género. In El Correísmo Al Desnudo, ed. Juan Cuvi, Decio Machado, Atawallpa Oviedo, and Natalia Sierra, 53–69. Quito: Montecristi Vive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, Loïc. 2009. Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, John. eds. 1990. What Washington Means by Policy Reform. In Latin American Adjustment: How Much has Happened? 5–20. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.

  • Wilson, Tamar Diana. 2013. Violence Against Women in Latin America. Latin American Perspectives 41(1): 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaffaroni, Eugenio Raúl. 2009. El Discurso Feminista y El Poder Punitivo. In El Género En El Derecho. Ensayos Críticos, ed. Ramiro Ávila, Judith Salgado, and Lola Valladares, 321–334. Quito: Ministerio de justicia y derechos humanos.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank Dr. Katie Cruz, Dr. Arturo Sánchez García, Dr. Anne Carr, Professor Aziza Ahmed, Dr. Sebastián López Hidalgo, and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on earlier versions of this article. I am always grateful to Professor Kate Bedford for her continued guidance and support. All errors remain my own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvana Tapia Tapia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tapia Tapia, S. Feminism and Penal Expansion: The Role of Rights-Based Criminal Law in Post-Neoliberal Ecuador. Fem Leg Stud 26, 285–306 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-018-9380-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-018-9380-5

Keywords

Navigation