Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Importance of Feedback in Preparing Social Work Students for Field Education

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Feedback is an important mechanism that enhances student learning in supervision and field education. Constructive feedback that is specific, timely, and based on observations; bridges theory and practice, enhances self-awareness, and builds holistic competence in social work students. There is scant social work research examining how this teaching mechanism facilitates student learning. In this qualitative study we examined the role of feedback in student learning using a simulation-based learning activity aimed at developing holistic competence in the classroom to prepare students for field learning. The study examined the impact of feedback on student learning and the key elements that facilitated learning related to feedback. We identified four themes that described the impact of feedback on student learning: (1) feedback enhanced knowledge, (2) feedback improved skills, (3) feedback developed professional judgment, and (4) feedback increased self-reflection. The processes influencing the impact of feedback were the source of the feedback, type of feedback given, and delivery of feedback. The results deepen our understanding of feedback as a learning mechanism with implications for field education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Study design and procedures were originally reported in Kourgiantakis et al. (in press).

References

  • Abbott, A. A., & Lyter, S. C. (1998). The use of constructive criticism in field supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 17(2), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications (8th ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, P., & Harris, S. (2017). Using live supervision to teach counselling skills to social work students. Social Work Education, 36(3), 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barretti, M. A. (2009). Ranking desirable field instructor characteristics: Viewing student preferences in context with field and class experience. The Clinical Supervisor, 28(1), 47–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, P., & Norman, G. (2011). Self-assessment or self deception? A lack of association between nursing students’ self-assessment and performance. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(11), 2406–2413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beddoe, L., Ackroyd, J., Chinnery, S. A., & Appleton, C. (2011). Live supervision of students in field placement: More than just watching. Social Work Education, 30(5), 512–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (1998). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (pp. 152–176). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bland, A. J., Topping, A., & Tobbell, J. (2014). Time to unravel the conceptual confusion of authenticity and fidelity and their contribution to learning within simulation-based nurse education. A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today, 34(7), 1112–1118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bland, A. J., Topping, A., & Wood, B. (2011). A concept analysis of simulation as a learning strategy in the education of undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 31(7), 664–670.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bogo, M. (2010). Achieving competence in social work through field education. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogo, M. (2015). Field education for clinical social work practice: Best practices and contemporary challenges. Clinical Social Work Journal, 43(3), 317–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogo, M., Rawlings, M., Katz, E., & Logie, C. (2014). Using simulation in assessment and teaching: OSCE Adapted for social work (Objective Structured Clinical Examination). Alexandria, VI: CSWE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogo, M., Regehr, C., Power, R., & Regehr, G. (2007). When values collide: Field instructors’ experiences of providing feedback and evaluating competence. The Clinical Supervisor, 26(1–2), 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogo, M., Lee, B., McKee, E., Ramjattan, R., & Baird, S., L. (2017). Bridging class and field: Field instructors’ and liaisons’ reactions to information about students’ baseline performance derived from simulated interviews. Journal of Social Work Education, 53(4), 580–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2017.1283269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borders, L. D., Welfare, L. E., Sackett, C. R., & Cashwell, C. (2017). New supervisors’ struggles and successes with corrective feedback. Counselor Education and Supervision, 56(3), 208–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (1999). Avoiding the traps: Seeking good practice in the use of self assessment and reflection in professional courses. Social Work Education, 18(2), 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, D. L., Miller, S. D., Seidel, J. A., Kane, R. T., Thornton, J. A., & Andrews, W. P. (2015). The role of deliberate practice in the development of highly effective psychotherapists. Psychotherapy, 52(3), 337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Council on Social Work Education. (2015). Educational policy and accreditation standards (EPAS). Alexandria, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.csocialworke.org/file.aspx?id=81660.

  • Council on Social Work Education. (2015). Report of the CSWE Summit on Field Education 2014. Alexandria, VA: CSWE. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/CMSPages/GetFile.aspx?guid=56b3d093-68c1-4558-9af9-b742dc93230.

  • Cozolino, L. J., & Santos, E. N. (2014). Why we need therapy-and why it works: A neuroscientific perspective. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 84, 157–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davys, A. M., & Beddoe, L. (2015). ‘Going Live’: A negotiated collaborative model for live observation of practice. Practice: Social Work in Action, 27(3), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2015.1032234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earls Larrison, T. E., & Korr, W. S. (2013). Does social work have a signature pedagogy? Journal of Social Work Education, 49(2), 194–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, M. L. (1994). Critical field instructor behaviors: Student and field instructor views. Arete, 18(2), 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppich, W., & Cheng, A. (2015). Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS): Development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simulation in Healthcare, 10(2), 106–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1), 273–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W., & Regehr, G. (2005). Self-assessment in the health professions: A reformulation and research agenda. Academic Medicine, 80(10), S46–S54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J., & Taylor, I. (2013). Failure to fail? Practice educators’ emotional experiences of assessing failing social work students. Social Work Education, 32(2), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2012.720250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortune, A. E., & Abramson, J. S. (1993). Predictors of satisfaction with field practicum among social work students. The Clinical Supervisor, 11(1), 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortune, A. E., Lee, M., & Cavazos, A. (2007). Does practice make perfect? Practicing professional skills and outcomes in social work field education. The Clinical Supervisor, 26(1–2), 239–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortune, A. E., McCarthy, M., & Abramson, J. S. (2001). Student learning processes in field education: Relationship of learning activities to quality of field instruction, satisfaction, and performance among MSW students. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(1), 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E. (1985). The importance of feedback in clinical supervision: Implications for direct practice. The Clinical Supervisor, 3(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, R. K. (2014). Supervision as pedagogy: Attending to its essential instructional and learning processes. The Clinical Supervisor, 33(1), 82–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, E. J., Ting, L., Pecukonis, E., Hodorowicz, M., & Wade, K. (2017). The role of empathy in training social work students in motivational interviewing. Social Work Education, 36(7), 794–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman-Stone, C. (2004). Trainee preferences for feedback and evaluation in clinical supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 22(1), 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heron, G., McGoldrick, R., & Wilson, R. (2014). Exploring the influence of feedback on student social workers’ understanding of childcare and protection. The British Journal of Social Work, 45(8), 2317–2334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homonoff, E. (2008). The heart of social work: Best practitioners rise to challenges in field instruction. The Clinical Supervisor, 27(2), 135–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpenko, V., & Gidycz, C. A. (2012). The supervisory relationship and the process of evaluation: Recommendations for supervisors. The Clinical Supervisor, 31(2), 138–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, E. (2001). Observing practice as participant observation—Linking theory to practice. Social Work Education, 20(5), 527–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourgiantakis, T., Bogo, M., & Sewell, K. M. (in press). Practice Fridays: Using simulation to develop holistic competence. Journal of Social Work Education.

  • Ladany, N., Mori, Y., & Mehr, K. E. (2013). Effective and ineffective supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 41(1), 28–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., & Fortune, A. E. (2013). Patterns of field learning activities and their relation to learning outcome. Journal of Social Work Education, 49, 420–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maidment, J. (2000). Methods used to teach social work students in the field: A research report from New Zealand. Social Work Education, 19(2), 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miehls, D., Everett, J., Segal, C., & Bois, C. D. (2013). MSW students’ views of supervision: Factors contributing to satisfactory field experiences. The Clinical Supervisor, 32(1), 128–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J., Kovacs, P. J., Wright, L., Corcoran, J., & Rosenblum, A. (2005). Field education: Student and field instructor perceptions of the learning process. Journal of Social Work Education, 41(1), 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo, B. (1973). Aspects of live supervision. Family Process, 12(4), 343–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooradian, J. K. (2007). Simulated family therapy interviews in clinical social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 27(1–2), 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramani, S., & Krackov, S. K. (2012). Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment. Medical Teacher, 34, 787–791.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saltzburg, S., Greene, G. J., & Drew, H. (2010). Using live supervision in field education: Preparing social work students for clinical practice. Families in Society, 91(3), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.4008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenck, J., & Cruickshank, J. (2015). Evolving Kolb: Experiential education in the age of neuroscience. Journal of Experiential Education, 38(1), 73–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. (2006). An interpersonal neurobiological approach to psychotherapy. Psychiatric Annals 36(4), 248–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoltenberg, C. D. (2005). Enhancing professional competence through developmental approaches to supervision. American Psychologist, 60(8), 857.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltenberg, C. D. (2008). Developmental approaches to supervision. In C. A. Falender & E. P. Shafranske (Eds.), Casebook for clinical supervision: A competency-based approach (pp. 39–56). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltenberg, C. D., & McNeill, B. W. (2010). IDM supervision: An integrative developmental model of supervision. New York: Taylor & Francis Group

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, K., & Lamoreaux, A. (2008). Teaching with the brain in mind. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 119, 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, 246 Bloor Street West, Toronto, ON, M5S 1V4, Canada

    Toula Kourgiantakis, Karen M. Sewell & Marion Bogo

Authors
  1. Toula Kourgiantakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karen M. Sewell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marion Bogo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toula Kourgiantakis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kourgiantakis, T., Sewell, K.M. & Bogo, M. The Importance of Feedback in Preparing Social Work Students for Field Education. Clin Soc Work J 47, 124–133 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-018-0671-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-018-0671-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation