Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Combination therapy of focused ultrasound and radio-frequency for noninvasive body contouring in Asians with MRI photographic documentation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that single or multiple treatments by focused ultrasound are effective and safe. However, most include focused ultrasound only and not radio-frequency treatment. There is paucity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements and pictures in the literature. This study aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and pain and satisfaction levels of the combination therapy of focused ultrasound and radio-frequency for improving body contours. Thirty-two Asian patients received 3 sequential treatments every 2 weeks in the abdominal region. Safety parameters and adverse events were recorded. The subjects’ pain and satisfaction levels were evaluated using a five-point Likert scale. Two patients underwent MRI study randomly. There was a mean reduction in circumference of 3.91 ± 1.8 cm (p ≤ 0.001). In MRI measurement, the average in fat thickness reduction was 21.4 and 25 % on the upper and lower abdomen, respectively. There were three mild and self-limited localized adverse events. The satisfaction survey showed that 71.9 % was satisfied with the results, while pain level evaluation showed that 90.5 % felt no pain. Combination therapy of focused ultrasound and radio-frequency for noninvasive body contouring is an effective, safe, and painless procedure in Asians. Although the change is minor compared to traditional surgical procedure, it is real, definite, and effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (2011) Cosmetic surgery national data bank statistics. Available at http://www.surgery.org/sites/default/files/ASAPS-2011-Stats.pdf

  2. Sasaki GH (2011) Water-assisted liposuction for body contouring and lipoharvesting: safety and efficacy in 41 consecutive patients. Aesthet Surg J 31(1):76–88. doi:10.1177/1090820X10391465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blugerman G, Schavelzon D, Paul MD (2010) A safety and feasibility study of a novel radiofrequency-assisted liposuction technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(3):998–1006. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ce1820

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Habbema L (2009) Safety of liposuction using exclusively tumescent local anesthesia in 3,240 consecutive cases. Dermatol Surg 35(11):1728–1735. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01284.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Haeck PC, Swanson JA, Gutowski KA, Basu CB, Wandel AG, Damitz LA, Reisman NR, Baker SB (2009) Evidence-based patient safety advisory: liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(4 Suppl):28S–44S. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b52fcd

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Teitelbaum SA, Burns JL, Kubota J, Matsuda H, Otto MJ, Shirakabe Y, Suzuki Y, Brown SA (2007) Noninvasive body contouring by focused ultrasound: safety and efficacy of the Contour I device in a multicenter, controlled, clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(3):779–789. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000270840.98133.c8, discussion 790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moreno-Moraga J, Valero-Altes T, Riquelme AM, Isarria-Marcosy MI, de la Torre JR (2007) Body contouring by non-invasive transdermal focused ultrasound. Lasers Surg Med 39(4):315–323. doi:10.1002/lsm.20478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown SA, Greenbaum L, Shtukmaster S, Zadok Y, Ben-Ezra S, Kushkuley L (2009) Characterization of nonthermal focused ultrasound for noninvasive selective fat cell disruption (lysis): technical and preclinical assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(1):92–101. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31819c59c7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ascher B (2010) Safety and efficacy of UltraShape Contour I treatments to improve the appearance of body contours: multiple treatments in shorter intervals. Aesthet Surg J 30(2):217–224. doi:10.1177/1090820X09360692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shek S, Yu C, Yeung CK, Kono T, Chan HH (2009) The use of focused ultrasound for non-invasive body contouring in Asians. Lasers Surg Med 41(10):751–759. doi:10.1002/lsm.20875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hotta TA (2010) Nonsurgical body contouring with focused ultrasound. Plast Surg Nurs 30(2):77–82. doi:10.1097/PSN.0b013e3181dee9c9, quiz 83–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt PK, Carter JE (1990) Static and dynamic differences among five types of skinfold calipers. Hum Biol 62(3):369–388

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose. There are no funding sources for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sindy Hu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, SL., Huang, YL., Lee, MC. et al. Combination therapy of focused ultrasound and radio-frequency for noninvasive body contouring in Asians with MRI photographic documentation. Lasers Med Sci 29, 165–172 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1301-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1301-x

Keywords

Navigation