Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact exercise and bone density in premenopausal women with below average bone density for age

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To study the effects of two home-based impact exercise programs on areal bone mineral density (aBMD) in adult premenopausal women with below average aBMD for age (negative Z-scores; 40.8 years; n = 107).

Methods

Two unilateral impact exercise programs were employed, one targeting the total hip and lumbar spine (n = 42 pairs), the other the distal radius (n = 24 pairs) with some individuals performing both. Force plate data were used to establish exercise loading characteristics (peak loads, time to peak), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) provided bone data. Calcium intake, health and extraneous physical activity (PA) were determined by survey. Exercise for both hip and spine consisted of unilateral landings from adjustable steps (maximum height 63.5 cm) while impacts were delivered to the forearm by arresting falls against a wall. An exercise log was used to provide the exercise prescription, record each exercise bout and any injuries. Participants were randomly assigned to exercise or control groups and pair-matched (age, BMI, Z-score, aBMD). Compliance was calculated as the number of sessions completed divided by the total prescribed number (mean ~50 %).

Results

The programs delivered significant gains pre to post at each site compared with significant losses in controls (forearm: 3.9 vs −3.9 %; total hip: 2.0 vs −2.6 %; lumbar spine: 2.8 vs −2.9 % exercise and controls, respectively, all p < 0.001). No exerciser lost bone at the target site regardless of compliance which was strongly correlated with bone gains (R 2 = 0.53–0.68, all p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Impact exercise provides an effective means of improving below average aBMD without supervision in this at risk population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

aBMD:

Areal bone mineral density

BMC:

Bone mineral content

BMI:

Body mass index

CFQ:

Calcium frequency questionnaire

DXA:

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

GRF:

Ground reaction forces

MANOVA:

Multiple analysis of variance

METs:

Metabolic equivalents

References

  • Adami S, Gatti D, Braga V, Bianchini D, Rossini M (1999) Site-specific effects of strength training on bone structure and geometry of ultradistal radius in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 14:120–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, Leon AS (2000) Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:S498–504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allison SJ, Folland JP, Rennie WJ, Summers GD, Brooke-Wavell K (2013) High impact exercise and increased femoral neck bone mineral density in older men: a randomised unilateral intervention. Bone 53:321–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Babatunde OO, Forsyth JJ, Gidlow CJ (2012) A meta-analysis of brief high- impact exercises for enhancing bone health in premenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 23:109–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge KE, Sowers MF, Crutchfield M, Lin X, Jannausch M, Harlow SD (2002) Natural history of bone loss over 6 years among premenopausal and early postmenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol 156:410–417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bassey EJ, Ramsdale SJ (1994) Increase in femoral bone density in young women following high-impact exercise. Osteoporos Int 4:72–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bassey EJ, Ramsdale SJ (1995) Weight-bearing exercise and ground reaction forces: a 12-month randomized controlled trial of effects on bone mineral density in healthy postmenopausal women. Bone 16:469–476

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frost HM (2001) From Wolff’s law to the Utah paradigm: insights about bone physiology and its clinical applications. Anat Rec 262:398–41923

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenway KG, Walkley JW, Rich PA (2012) Does long-term swimming participation have a deleterious effect on the adult female skeleton? Eur J Appl Physiol 112:3217–3225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heinonen A, Kannus P, Sievänen H, Oja P, Pasanen M, Rinne M, Uusi-Rasi K, Vuori I (1996) Randomised controlled trial of effect of high-impact exercise on selected risk factors for osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 16:1343–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato T, Terashima T, Yamashita T, Hatanaka Y, Honda A, Umemura Y (2006) Effect of low-repetition jump training on bone mineral density in young women. J Appl Physiol 100:839–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohrt WM, Barry DW, Schwartz RS (2009) Muscle forces or gravity: what predominates mechanical loading on bone? Med Sci Sports Exerc 41:2050–2055

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kriska AM, Sandler RB, Cauley JA, LaPorte RE, Hom DL, Pambianco G (1988) The assessment of historical physical activity and its relation to adult bone parameters. Am J Epidemiol 127:1053–1063

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu-Ambrose TY, Khan KM, Eng JJ, Heinonen A, McKay HA (2004) Both resistance and agility training increase cortical bone density in 75- to 85-year-old women. J Clin Densitom 7:390–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKelvie KJ, Khan KM, McKay HA (2002) Is there a critical period for bone response to weight-bearing exercise in children and adolescents? A systematic review. Br J Sports Med 36:250–257

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martyn-St James M, Carroll S (2009) A meta-analysis of impact exercise on postmenopausal bone loss: the case for mixed loading exercise programmes. Br J Sports Med 43:898–908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson ME, Baker C, Roubenoff R, Lindner L (2002) Strong Women and Men Beat Arthritis. Penguin, New York

  • Nowson CA, Sherwin AJ, Green RM, Wark JD (1995) Limitations of dietary calcium assessment in female twins of different ages. Challen Modern Med 7:97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwoll ES, Oviatt SK (1991) Longitudinal precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter study. The Nafarelin/Bone Study Group. J Bone Miner Res 6:191–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prior JC, Vigna YM, Barr SI, Kennedy S, Schulzer M, Li DK (1996) Ovulatory premenopausal women lose cancellous spinal bone: a five year prospective study. Bone 18:261–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robling AG, Hinant FM, Burr DB, Turner CH (2002) Improved bone structure and strength after long-term mechanical loading is greatest if loading is separated into short bouts. J Bone Miner Res 17:1545–1554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin CT, Lanyon LE (1984) Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:397–402

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner CH, Robling AG (2003) Designing exercise regimens to increase bone strength. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 31:45–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vainionpää A, Korpelainen R, Leppaluoto J, Jämsä T (2005) Effects of high-impact exercise on bone mineral density: a randomized controlled trial in premenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 16:191–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace BA, Cumming RG (2000) Systematic review of randomized trials of the effect of exercise on bone density in pre- and postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 67:10–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh L, Rutherford OM (1996) Hip bone mineral density is improved by high-impact aerobic exercise in postmenopausal women and men over 50 years. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 74:511–517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winters-Stone KM, Snow CM (2006) Site-specific response of bone to exercise in premenopausal women. Bone 39:1203–1209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their appreciation to the all of the participants and to the Shepherd Foundation of Victoria for funding that supported the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter A. Rich.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Kathleen Greenway, Jeff Walkley and Peter Rich declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

Ethical approval All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Communicated by Olivier Seynnes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Greenway, K.G., Walkley, J.W. & Rich, P.A. Impact exercise and bone density in premenopausal women with below average bone density for age. Eur J Appl Physiol 115, 2457–2469 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-015-3225-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-015-3225-6

Keywords

Navigation