Abstract
Background
The laparoscopic approach to a difficult splenectomy requires a longer total operative time and is frequently associated with an increased risk of bleeding and a high conversion rate.
Methods
A total of 418 elective splenectomies were registered in the Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation of Fundeni Clinical Institute between January 1995 and June 2012, of which 299 splenectomies (212 laparoscopic and 77 robotic) were performed by a single surgical team and retrospectively documented. The effect of the learning curve and the relative complexity of each type of procedure were analyzed using the Minimally Invasive Splenectomy Score, which further allowed categorizing the splenectomies as simple or difficult. Statistical analyses using the CUSUM algorithm of the intra- and postoperative parameters of the laparoscopic and robotic approaches, for both the simple and the difficult splenectomies, were performed.
Results
The results of the statistical analyses clearly indicated that there was a learning curve effect for laparoscopic splenectomy but not for robotic splenectomy. When compared with the laparoscopic approach in difficult splenectomies, the robotic approach had a shorter total operative time (84.13 vs. 97.2 min), less blood loss (30.88 vs. 156.9 ml), and decreased risk of hemorrhagic complications during surgery.
Conclusions
Laparoscopic splenectomy remains the approach of choice for simple splenectomies in the surgical treatment for common indications. The robotic system is particularly beneficial in difficult splenectomies (i.e., partial splenectomy, splenectomy in liver cirrhosis, splenic tumors, or malignant hemopathies).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Delaitre B, Maignien B (1991) Splenectomy by the laparoscopic approach. Report of a case. Presse Med 20(44):2263
Feldman LS (2011) Laparoscopic splenectomy: standardized approach. World J Surg 35(7):1487–1495
Targarona EM, Espert JJ, Cerdan G, Balague C, Piulachs J, Sugranes G et al (1999) Effect of spleen size on splenectomy outcome. A comparison of open and laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13(6):559–562
Casaccia M, Torelli P, Squarcia S, Sormani MP, Savelli A, Troilo B et al (2006) Laparoscopic splenectomy for hematologic diseases: a preliminary analysis performed on the Italian Registry of Laparoscopic Surgery of the Spleen (IRLSS). Surg Endosc 20(8):1214–1220
Brodsky JA, Brody FJ, Walsh RM, Malm JA, Ponsky JL (2002) Laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Endosc 16(5):851–854
Grahn SW, Alvarez J III, Kirkwood K (2006) Trends in laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly. Arch Surg 141(8):755–761
Imura S, Shimada M, Utsunomiya T, Morine Y, Ikemoto T, Mori H et al (2010) Impact of splenectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis: Results from 18 patients in a single center experience. Hepatol Res 40(9):894–900
Chan SW, Hensman C, Waxman BP, Blamey S, Cox J, Farrell K et al (2002) Technical developments and a team approach leads to an improved outcome: lessons learnt implementing laparoscopic splenectomy. ANZ J Surg 72(7):523–527
Tan M, Zheng CX, Wu ZM, Chen GT, Chen LH, Zhao ZX (2003) Laparoscopic splenectomy: the latest technical evaluation. World J Gastroenterol 9(5):1086–1089
Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, Blasco JA, Guerra M, Andradas E et al (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252(2):254–262
Vasilescu C, Stanciulea O, Tudor S (2012) Laparoscopic versus robotic subtotal splenectomy in hereditary spherocytosis. Potential advantages and limits of an expensive approach. Surg Endosc 26(10):2802–2809
Vasilescu C, Stanciulea O, Tudor S, Stanescu D, Colita A, Stoia R et al (2006) Laparoscopic subtotal splenectomy in hereditary spherocytosis: to preserve the upper or the lower pole of the spleen? Surg Endosc 20(5):748–752
Vasilescu C, Tudor S, Popa M, Tiron A, Lupescu I (2010) Robotic partial splenectomy for hydatid cyst of the spleen. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395(8):1169–1174
Vasilescu C (2005) Laparoscopic splenectomy. Chirurgia (Bucur) 100(6):595–598
Vasilescu C, Tomulescu V, Ciurea S, Popescu I (2001) [Laparoscopic splenectomy–lessons learned from a series of 40 cases. The advantages of the postero-lateral approach]. Chirurgia (Bucur) 96(2):231–236
Qian D, He Z, Hua J, Gong J, Lin S, Song Z (2014) Hand-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic splenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg. doi:10.1111/ans.12597
Wang X, Li Y, Peng B (2013) Hand-assisted laparoscopic technique in the setting of complicated splenectomy: a 9-year experience. World J Surg 37(9):2046–2052
Wang X, Li Y, Zhou J, Wu Z, Peng B (2012) Hand-assited laparoscopic splenectomy is a better choice for patients with supramassive splenomegaly due to liver cirrhosis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22(10):962–977
Barnard GA (1959) Control charts and stochastic processes. J R Stat Soc Series B 21:239–271
Noyez L (2009) Control charts, Cusum techniques and funnel plots. A review of methods for monitoring performance in healthcare. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 9(3):494–499
Bani Hani MN, Qasaimeh GR, Bani-Hani KE, Alwaqfi NR, Al Manasra AR, Matani YS et al (2010) Laparoscopic splenectomy: consensus and debatable points. S Afr J Surg 48(3):81–84
Heniford BT, Park A, Walsh RM, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, Frenette G et al (2001) Laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with normal-sized spleens versus splenomegaly: does size matter? Am Surg 67(9):854–857
Vasilescu C, Stanciulea O, Colita A, Stoia R, Moicean A, Arion C (2003) Laparoscopic subtotal splenectomy in the treatment of hereditary spherocytosis. Chirurgia (Bucur) 98(6):571–576
Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F et al (2005) Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 19(1):117–119
Hashizume M, Tsugawa K (2004) Robotic surgery and cancer: the present state, problems and future vision. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34(5):227–237
Vasilescu C, Popescu I (2008) Robotic surgery–possibilities and perspectives. Chirurgia (Bucur) 103(1):9–11
Bodner J, Lucciarini P, Fish J, Kafka-Ritsch R, Schmid T (2005) Laparoscopic splenectomy with the da Vinci robot. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 15(1):1–5
Gelmini R, Franzoni C, Spaziani A, Patriti A, Casciola L, Saviano M (2011) Laparoscopic splenectomy: conventional versus robotic approach–a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21(5):393–398
Giulianotti PC, Buchs NC, Addeo P, Ayloo S, Bianco FM (2011) Robot-assisted partial and total splenectomy. Int J Med Robot 7(4):482–488
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a Grant from the Ministry of National Education, CNCS – UEFISCDI, project No. PN-II-ID-PCE-2012-4-0018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
D.-E. Giza and S. Tudor contributed equally to this work.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giza, DE., Tudor, S., Purnichescu-Purtan, R.R. et al. Robotic Splenectomy: What is the Real Benefit?. World J Surg 38, 3067–3073 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2697-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2697-6