Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Forearm interosseous membrane imaging and anatomy

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine the regional thickness variation of the interosseous membrane (IOM) along the forearm and validate magnetic resonance imaging of the IOM with laser micrometry.

Design and patients

Axial thickness measurements of 12 cadaver forearms were obtained using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at radial, central, and ulnar locations. The specimens were dissected, and IOM thickness measured using a laser micrometer. MRI and laser measurements of the main and oblique IOM bundles were compared. An axial thickness profile was plotted versus forearm length, and radial, central, and ulnar positions were compared.

Results

The main bundle thickness was 2.18±0.20 mm using laser micrometry, which was not significantly different from MRI measurements (1.86±0.25 mm, p=0.11, power = 0.84). The dorsal oblique bundle thickness was not significantly different between measurement methods (2.93±0.77 mm and 3.30±1.64 mm using laser micrometry and MRI respectively, p=0.75, power = 0.04). Both methods demonstrated a progressive increase in thickness proximally within the forearm. MRI measurements demonstrated a significantly greater thickness increase in the radial location compared to the central location (slope = 2.26 and 1.05, r2=0.31 and 0.12 respectively, p<0.05). The ulnar slope was not significantly different from zero (r2=0.02, p>0.05).

Conclusion

Our findings describe the varying IOM anatomy using MRI, and determined the location of the clinically important IOM fiber bundles. This study confirms the accuracy of MR imaging of the IOM by comparison with a laser micrometer, and demonstrates the thickness variation along the forearm. This information may be used to identify changes in IOM anatomy with both acute IOM injury and chronic fiber attenuation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3A–E
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hollister AM, Gellman H, Waters RL. The relationship of the interosseous membrane to the axis of rotation of the forearm. Clin Orthop 1994; 298:272–276.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Werner JA, Koebke J. The function of the antebrachial interosseous membrane. Anat Embryol 1987; 176:127–131.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Poitevin LA. Anatomy and biomechanics of the interosseous membrane: its importance in the longitudinal stability of the forearm. Hand Clin 2001; 17:97–110.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hotchkiss RN, An KN, Sowa DT, Basta S, Weiland AJ. An anatomic and mechanical study of the interosseous membrane of the forearm: pathomechanics of proximal migration of the radius. J Hand Surg [Am] 1989; 14:256–261.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nakamura T, Yabe Y, Horiuchi Y. Functional anatomy of the interosseous membrane of the forearm - dynamic changes during rotation. Hand Surg 1999; 4:67–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Failla JM, Jacobson J, van Holsbeeck M. Ultrasound diagnosis and surgical pathology of the torn interosseous membrane in forearm fractures/dislocations. J Hand Surg [Am] 1999; 24:257–266.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nakamura T, Yabe Y, Horiuchi Y, Yamazaki N. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of the interosseous membrane of forearm: a new method using fuzzy reasoning. Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 17:463–470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakamura T, Yabe Y, Horiuchi Y. In vivo MR studies of dynamic changes in the interosseous membrane of the forearm during rotation. J Hand Surg [Br] 1999; 24:245–248.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Starch DW, Dabezies EJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of the interosseous membrane of the forearm. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83:235–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaakkola JI, Riggans DH, Lourie GM, Lang CJ, Hassem BE, Rosenthal SJ. Ultrasonography for the evaluation of forearm interosseous membrane disruption in a cadaver model. J Hand Surg [Am] 2001; 26:1053–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Skahen JR 3rd, Palmer AK, Werner FW, Fortino MD. The interosseous membrane of the forearm: anatomy and function. J Hand Surg [Am] 1997; 22:981–985.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schneiderman G, Meldrum RD, Bloebaum RD, Tarr R, Sarmiento A. The interosseous membrane of the forearm: structure and its role in Galeazzi fractures. J Trauma 1993; 35:879–885.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Christensen JB, Adams JP, Cho KO, Miller L. A study of the interosseous distance between the radius and ulna during rotation of the forearm. Anat Rec 1968; 160:261–271.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Christodoulou G, Korovessis P, Giarmenitis S, Dimopoulos P, Sdougos G. The use of sonography for evaluation of the integrity and healing process of the tibiofibular interosseous membrane in ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 1995; 9:98–106.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Skahen JR III, Palmer AK, Werner FW, Fortino MD. Reconstruction of the interosseous membrane of the forearm in cadavers. J Hand Surg [Am] 1997; 22:986–994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott H. Kozin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McGinley, J.C., Roach, N., Gaughan, J.P. et al. Forearm interosseous membrane imaging and anatomy. Skeletal Radiol 33, 561–568 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-004-0795-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-004-0795-5

Keywords

Navigation