Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Thermal-economic multi-objective optimization of shell and tube heat exchanger using particle swarm optimization (PSO)

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many studies are performed by researchers about shell and tube heat exchanger (STHE) but the multi-objective particle swarm optimization (PSO) technique has never been used in such studies. This paper presents application of thermal-economic multi-objective optimization of STHE using PSO. For optimal design of a STHE, it was first thermally modeled using e-number of transfer units method while Bell–Delaware procedure was applied to estimate its shell side heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop. Multi objective PSO (MOPSO) method was applied to obtain the maximum effectiveness (heat recovery) and the minimum total cost as two objective functions. The results of optimal designs were a set of multiple optimum solutions, called ‘Pareto optimal solutions’. In order to show the accuracy of the algorithm, a comparison is made with the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) and MOPSO which are developed for the same problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A:

Heat transfer area (m2)

BC:

Baffle cut (m)

Cp :

Specific heat in constant pressure (J/kg K)

C:

Heat capacity rate ratio (Ch/Cmax)

Cin :

Total investment cost ($)

Cop :

Total operating cost ($)

Co :

Annual operating cost ($/year)

Ctotal :

Total cost ($)

CL:

Tube layout constant (–)

CTP:

Tube count calculation constant (–)

di :

Tube side inside diameter (m)

do :

Tube side outside diameter (m)

Ds :

Shell diameter (m)

f:

Friction factor (–)

Gs :

Fluid mass velocity based on the minimum free area

hi :

Tube side heat transfer coefficient (W/m2 K)

ho :

Shell side heat transfer coefficient (W/m2 K)

i:

Annual discount rate (%)

jc :

Correction factor for baffle configuration

js :

Correction factor for bigger baffle spacing at the shell inlet and outlet sections

jr :

Correction factor for the adverse temperature gradient in laminar flows

jb :

Correction factor for bundle and pass partition bypass streams

jl :

Correction factor for baffle leakage effect

Kc :

Entrance pressure loss coefficient (–)

Ke :

Exit pressure loss coefficient (–)

kel :

Price of electrical energy ($/kWh)

k:

Thermal conductivity (W/m k)

L:

Tube length (m)

Lbc :

Baffle spacing (m)

m:

Mass flow rate (kg/s)

np :

Number of tube pass (–)

Nt:

Number of tube (–)

NTU:

Number of transfer units (–)

Pt :

Tube pitch (m)

Q:

Heat transfer rate (kW)

Re:

Reynolds number (–)

T:

Temperature (°C)

U:

Overall heat transfer coefficient (W/m2 K)

σ:

Ratio of minimum free flow area to frontal area (–)

References

  1. Hewitt GF (ed) (1998) Heat exchanger design handbook. Begell House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shah RK, Bell KJ, RC C (2000) The CRC handbook of thermal engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  3. Venkata Rao R, Patel V (2013) Multi-objective optimization of heat exchangers using a modified teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm. Appl Math Model 37(3):1147–1162

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao M, Li Y (2013) An effective layer pattern optimization model for multi-stream plate-fin heat exchanger using genetic algorithm. Int J Heat Mass Transf 60:480–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Qian S, Huang L, Aute V, Hwang Y, Radermacher R (2013) Applicability of entransy dissipation based thermal resistance for design optimization of two-phase heat exchangers. Appl Therm Eng 55(1):140–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saleh K, Abdelaziz O, Aute V, Radermacher R, Azarm S (2013) Approximation assisted optimization of headers for new generation of air-cooled heat exchangers. Appl Therm Eng 61(2):817–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hadidi A, Nazari A (2013) Design and economic optimization of shell-and-tube heat exchangers using biogeography-based (BBO) algorithm. Appl Therm Eng 51(1):1263–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fettaka S, Thibault J, Gupta Y (2013) Design of shell-and-tube heat exchangers using multiobjective optimization. Int J Heat Mass Transf 60:343–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sreepathi BK, Rangaiah GP (2014) Improved heat exchanger network retrofitting using exchanger reassignment strategies and multi-objective optimization. Energy 67:584–594

    Google Scholar 

  10. Onishi VC, Ravagnani MASS, Caballero JA (2013) Mathematical programming model for heat exchanger design through optimization of partial objectives. Energy Convers Manag 74:60–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo J, Huai X, Li X, Cai J, Wang Y (2013) Multi-objective optimization of heat exchanger based on entransy dissipation theory in an irreversible Brayton cycle system. Energy 63:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pan M, Bulatov I, Smith R, Kim J-K (2013) Optimisation for the retrofit of large scale heat exchanger networks with different intensified heat transfer techniques. Appl Therm Eng 53(2):373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Manassaldi JI, Scenna NJ, Mussati SF (2014) Optimization mathematical model for the detailed design of air cooled heat exchangers. Energy 64:734–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Patel V, Savsani V (2014) Optimization of a plate-fin heat exchanger design through an improved multi-objective teaching–learning based optimization (MO-ITLBO) algorithm. Chem Eng Res Des (in press)

  15. Costa LH, Queiroz M (2008) Design optimization of shell-and-tube heat exchangers. Appl Therm Eng 28:1798–1805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Caputo A, Pelagagge P, Salini P (2008) Heat exchanger design based on economic optimization. Appl Therm Eng 28(10):1151–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fesanghary M, Damangir E, Soleimani I (2009) Design optimization of shell and tube heat exchangers using global sensitivity analysis and harmony search algorithm. Appl Therm Eng 29:1026–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hilbert R, Janiga G, Baron R, Venin D (2006) Multi-objective shape optimization of a heat exchanger using parallel genetic algorithms. Int J Heat Mass Transf 49(15–16):2567–2577

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Sanaye S, Hajabdollahi H (2010) Multi-objective optimization of shell and tube heat exchangers. Appl Therm Eng 30(14–15):1937–1945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ponce-Ortega J, Serna-González M, Jiménez-Gutiérrez A (2009) Use of genetic algorithms for the optimal design of shell-and-tube heat exchangers. Appl Therm Eng 29(2–3):203–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shah RK, Sekulic P (2003) Fundamental of heat exchanger design. Wiley, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Fallah-Mehdipour E, Haddad OB, Rezapour Tabari M, Mario MA (2012) Extraction of decision alternatives in construction management projects: application and adaptation of NSGA-II and MOPSO. Expert Syst Appl 39(3):2794–2803

    Google Scholar 

  23. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Coello CAC, Pulido GT, Lechuga MS (2004) Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 8(3):256–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Ghanei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghanei, A., Assareh, E., Biglari, M. et al. Thermal-economic multi-objective optimization of shell and tube heat exchanger using particle swarm optimization (PSO). Heat Mass Transfer 50, 1375–1384 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-014-1340-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-014-1340-2

Keywords

Navigation