Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Berücksichtigung des „timing principle“ für die „rapid sequence induction“ nicht nötig

Consideration of the timing principle for rapid sequence induction is unnecessary

  • Leserbriefe
  • Published:
Der Anaesthesist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Warnecke T, Dobbermann M, Becker T, Bernhard M, Hinkelbein J (2018) Performance of prehospital emergency anesthesia and airway management : An online survey. Anaesthesist 67(9):654–663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eichelsbacher C, Ilper H, Noppens R, Hinkelbein J, Loop T (2018) Rapid sequence induction and intubation in patients with risk of aspiration : Recommendations for action for practical management of anesthesia. Anaesthesist 67(8):568–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews JI, Kumar N, van den Brom RH, Olkkola KT, Roest GJ, Wright PM (1999) A large simple randomized trial of rocuronium versus succinylcholine in rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia along with propofol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 43(1):4–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kopman AF, Klewicka MM, Reexamined NGG (2001) the recommended endotracheal intubating dose for nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockers of rapid onset. Anesth Analg 93(4):954–959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stollings JL, Diedrich DA, Oyen LJ, Brown DR (2014) Rapid-sequence intubation: a review of the process and considerations when choosing medications. Ann Pharmacother 48(1):62–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland

    T. Loop MD

  2. Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Köln (AöR), Köln, Deutschland

    J. Hinkelbein

Authors
  1. T. Loop MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Hinkelbein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Loop MD.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

T. Loop und J. Hinkelbein geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loop, T., Hinkelbein, J. Berücksichtigung des „timing principle“ für die „rapid sequence induction“ nicht nötig. Anaesthesist 68, 47–48 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-018-0531-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-018-0531-5

Search

Navigation