Skip to main content

Quantifying the concept of physico-chemical formulation in surfactant-oil-water systems — State of the art

  • Emulsions And Concentrated Systems
  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Trends in Colloid and Interface Science X

Part of the book series: Progress in Colloid & Polymer Science ((PROGCOLLOID,volume 100))

Abstract

The properties of surfactant-oil-water systems either at equilibrium or in dispersed state depend upon a large number of formulation variables that include not only the nature of the three components, but also the influence of electrolytes, alcohols and other additives (type and concentration), as well as temperature and pressure.

These variables contribute to an overall affinity balance at interface, a fact that was recognized in Winsor’s pioneering work as an attempt to interpret the experimental results rendered by the use of Banckoft’s rule or Griffin’s HLB. Then, Shinoda introduced the Phase Inversion Temperature (PIT), a characterization parameter that relies on an easily attainable experimental situation, whereas Beerbower and Hill proposed the Cohesive-Energy-Ratio (CER) approach as an attempt to develop a theoretical concept that could be easily linked with experimental results. In the 1970s, the Enhanced Oil Recovery research drive resulted in an extensive amount of experimental work dedicated to the development of multivariate empirical correlations for the attainment of three-phase behavior, a very well defined physico-chemical situation. The correlations contain a numerical contribution of the effect of each formulation variable that was later identified as an energy contribution to the surfactant affinity difference (SAD), a generalized formulation variable. The straightforward use of the correlations motivated experimentalists to extend its validity to very different systems, far beyond the original oil recovery scope. On the other hand, the surfactant partition coefficient between oil and water, an early measurement of the physico-chemical match, has been recently reinstated to a prominent place thanks to enhanced analytical methods; this approach is shown to lead to the same kind of quantitative description as the SAD, with a partial contribution of each group to the overall balance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becher P (ed) (1985–88) Encyclopedia of Emulsion Technology, 3 volumes. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Griffin WC (1949) J Soc Cosm Chem 1:311

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shinoda K, Kunieda H (1985) In: Becher P (ed) Encyclopedia of Emulsion Technology, Vol 1, Chap 5, Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Winsor P (1954) Solvent Properties of Amphiphilic Compounds, Butterworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bourrel M, Schechter RS (1988) Microemulsions and Related Systems, Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bourrel M, Biais J, Bothorel P, Clin B, Lalanne P (1991) J Dispersion Sci Technology 12:531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shah DO, Schechter RS (eds) (1977) Improved Oil Recovery by Surfactant and Polymer Flooding, Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beerbower A, Hill M (1971) In: Mac Cutcheon's Detergents and Emulsifiers, Allured Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Salager JL, Morgan J, Schechter R, Wade W, Vasquez E (1979) Soc Petrol Eng J 19:107

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bourrel M, Salager JL, Schechter RS, Wade WH (1980) J Colloid Interface Sci 75:451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Salager JL (1988) in Encyclopedia of Emulsion Technology, Becher P, Ed., Vol 3, Chap 3, Marcel Dekker

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kruglyakov P (1993) Worl Congress on Emulsion, Paris. References in Russian (1971) Dokladi Akademia Nauk CCCP, T. 197 (5) 1106, and Isveztia Sib Otd Akademia Nauk CCCP, No 9, V 4, 11

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davies JT (1957) Proceedings 2nd International Congress Surface Activity, Butterworths, London, Vol I, 426

    Google Scholar 

  14. Graciaa A, Lachaise J, Sayous JG, Grenier P, Yiv S, Schechter RS, Wade WH (1983) J Colloid Interface Sci 93:474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Márquez N (1994) Dr. Dissertation, Univ de Pau PA, Pau, France

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cratin P (1971) In: Ross S (ed) Chemistry and Physics at Interfaces — II. American Chemical Society Pub., Washington

    Google Scholar 

  17. Márquez N, Antón R, Graciaa A, Lachaise J, Salager JL (1995) Colloids and Surfaces A 100:225

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

C. Solans M. R. Infante M. J. García-Celma

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag GmbH & Co. KG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salager, J.L. (1996). Quantifying the concept of physico-chemical formulation in surfactant-oil-water systems — State of the art. In: Solans, C., Infante, M.R., García-Celma, M.J. (eds) Trends in Colloid and Interface Science X. Progress in Colloid & Polymer Science, vol 100. Steinkopff. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0115768

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0115768

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-1056-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7985-1665-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics