Abstract
Classification of visual patterns, a differentiating sign of which is the position of the longer axis of an oval and the principal part of the image, was studied. Stimuli were presented at random to the left (LVF) or right (RVF) visual fields in two situations:same (preceding imageS 1 was of the same form and presented to the same visual field as the current imageS 2) anddifferent (S 1 differed fromS 2 by both form and location). Classification ofdifferent images was less effective compared with that ofsame images during stimulation of LVF and showed no dependence on the preceding image during stimulation of RVF. The matching of event-related potentials (ERP) in response toS 2 and differential curvesS 2−S 1 revealed the processes related to accessing the information on the preceding stimulus and processing of the current stimulus, which simultaneously occur during the initial 50 ms in both hemispheres and in the 160–180 ms interval in the right hemisphere. Both processes were more expressed during stimulation of the contralateral visual field. In the 190–310 ms interval, discrimination of thesame anddifferent images was determined by processing of information about the current stimulus on the basis of the results of the preceding stage of analysis. This process was more expressed in the occipital, parietal and temporoparietooccipital regions of the right hemisphere independently of the stimulated visual field. The involvement of frontal regions at this stage of information processing was observed only at stimulation of RVF. The dependence of differences of ERP to thesame anddifferent images on the stimulated visual field was revealed for the 320–500-ms interval (N 400 and late positive complex) in the occipital regions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nelson, C. and Collins, P., Event-related Potential and Looking-Time Analysis of Infants’ Response to Familiar and Novel Events: Implications for Visual Memory,Dev. Physiol., 1991, vol. 27, no. 1, p. 50.
Hamberger, M. and Friedman, D., Event-related Potential Correlates of Repetition Priming and Stimulus Classification in Young, Middle-aged, and Older Adults,J. Gerontol., 1992, vol. 47, no. 6, p. 395.
Beteleva, T.G., Formation of the Traces of Visual Information. Analysis of Evoked Potentials,Fiziol. Chel., 1996, vol. 22, no. 3, p. 45.
Posner, M., Bois, S., Eichelman, W., and Taylor, R., Retention of Visual and Name Codes of Single Letters,J. Exp. Psychol., 1969, vol. 79, no. 1 (part 2), p. 45.
Bogomolova, I.V. and Farber, D.A., Electrophysiological Analysis of Visual Perceptive Memory. I. The Influence of Time Inverval between Discriminated Letters on the Parameters of ERP,Fiziol. Chel., 1995, vol. 21, no. 4, p. 13.
Bogomolova, I.V. and Farber, D.A., Electrophysiological Analysis of Visual Perceptive Memory. II. Reflection of the Mode of Recognition by the Model in Parameters ofP 3 Wave,Fiziol. Chel., 1996, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 40.
Parks, Th., Kroll, N., Salzberg, P., and Parkinson, S., Persistence of Visual Memory as Indicated by Decision Time in a Matching Task,J. Exp. Psychol., 1972, vol. 92, no. 3, p. 437.
Baddley, A.,Working Memory, Oxford Psychology Series, no. 11, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987, p. 289.
Fabiani, M., Karis, D., and Donchin, E., P300 and Recall in an Incidental Memory Paradigm,Psychophysiology, 1986, v. 23, no. 3, p. 298.
Paller, K., Kutas, M., and Mayes, A., Neural Correlates of Encoding in an Incidental Learning Paradigm,Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1987, vol. 67, no. 4, p. 360.
Noldy, N., Stelmack, R., and Campbell, K., Event-related Potentials and Recognition Memory for Pictures and Words: the Effects of Intentional and Incidental Learning,Psychophysiology, 1990, vol. 27, no. 4, p. 417.
Van Petten, C. and Senkfor, A., Memory for Words and Novel Visual Patterns: Repetition, Recognition, and Encoding Effects in the Event-related Brain Potential,Psychophysiology, 1996, vol. 33, no. 5, p. 491.
Schacter D., Implicit Memory: History and Current Status,J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., Mem., and Cognit., 1987, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 501.
Schacter D., Understanding Implicit Memory: a Cognitive Neuroscience Approach,Am. Psychol., 1992, vol. 47, p. 559.
Marsolek, Ch., and Kosslyn, S., Form-Specific Visual Priming in the Right Hemisphere,J. Exp. Psychol. Learn, Mem., and Cognit., 1992, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 492.
Koivisto, M., Form-specific Priming and Functional Brain Asymmetries in Perceptual Identification,Cortex, 1996, vol. 32, no. 3, p. 527.
Schacter D., Perceptual Representation Systems and Implicit Memory: towards a Resolution of the Multiple Memory System Debate,Ann. NY Acad. Sci, 1990, vol. 608, p. 543.
Schacter D., Implicit Memory: a Selective Review,Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 1993, vol. 16, p. 159.
Tulving, E. and Schacter, D., Priming and Human Memory Systems,Science, 1990, vol. 247, p. 301.
Friedman, D., Cognitive Event-related Potential Components during Continuous Recognition Memory for Pictures,Psychophysiology, 1990, vol. 27, no. 2, p. 136.
Munte, T., Brack, M., Grootheer, O.,et al., Event-related Brain Potentials to Unfamiliar Faces in Explicit and Implicit Memory Tasks,Neurosci. Res., 1997, vol. 28, no. 3, p. 223.
Zhang, X., Begleiter, H., Porjesz, B., and Litke, A., Visual Object Priming Differs from Word Priming. ERP Study,Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1997, vol. 102, no. 3, p. 200.
Beteleva, T.G., Age-related Peculiarities of Incidental Perception of Visual Stimuli,Fiziol. Chel., 1996, vol. 22, no. 5, p. 75.
Posner, M. and Mitchell, R., Chronometric Analysis of Classification,Psychol. Rev., 1967, vol. 74, no. 5, p. 392.
Seamon, J., Brody, N., and Kauft, D., Affective Discrimination of Stimuli That Are Not Recognized: Effect of Shadowing, Masking and Cerebral Laterality,J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., Mem., Cognit., 1983, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 544.
Magnani, G., Mazzuah, A., and Parma, M., Interhemispheric Differences in Same Versus Different Judgment upon Presentation of Complex Visual Stimuli,Neurophysiology, 1984, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 527.
Begleiter, H., Porjesz, B., and Wang, W., A Neurophysiologic Correlate of Visual Short-term Memory in Humans,Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, vol. 87, p. 46.
Hertz, Sh., Porjesz, B., Begleiter, H., and Chorlian, D., Event-related Potentials to Faces: the Effect of Priming and Recognition,Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1994, vol. 92, no. 4, p. 342.
Friedman, D., Sutton, S., Putnam, L.,et al., ERP Components in Picture Matching in Children and Adults,Psychophysiology, 1988, vol. 25, no. 5, p. 570.
Stuss, D., Sarazin, F., Leech, E., and Picton, T., Event-related Potentials during Naming and Mental Rotation,Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1983, vol. 56, no. 2, p. 133.
Neville, H., Electroencephalographic Testing of Cerebral Specialization in Normal and Congenitally Deaf Children: a Preliminary Report, inLanguage Development and Neurological Theory, Segalowitz, S. and Gruber F., Eds., New York: Academic Press, 1977, p. 121.
Beteleva, T.G., Changes in the Event-related Potentials during Image Classification,Fiziol. Chel., 1998, vol. 24, no. 4, p. 64.
Farber, D.A. and Beteleva, T.G., Regional and Hemispheric Specialization in Visual Recognition,Fiziol. Chel., 1999, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 15.
Chao, L., Nielsen-Bohlman, L., and Knight, R., Auditory Event-related Potentials Dissociate Early and Late Memory Processed,Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1995, vol. 96, no. 2, p. 157.
Nevskaya, A.A., and Leushina, L.I.,Asimmetriya polusharii i opoznavanie zritel’nych obrazov (Hemispheric Asymmetry and Recognition of Visual Patterns), Leningrad: Nauka, 1990.
Luriya, A.R.,Osnovy neiropsikhologii (The Principles of Neuropsychology), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1973.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beteleva, T.G. Functional specialization of hemispheres in matching current and preceding stimuli. Hum Physiol 26, 265–274 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02760186
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02760186