Skip to main content
Log in

Deformation and bonding processes in aluminum ultrasonic wire wedge bonding

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ultrasonic wire bonding (UWB) process has been examined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and standard wire pull testing techniques. Al-0.5 wt.% Mg wires 75 μm in diameter were bonded to pure and alloyed Al substrates. The bonding parameters, surface roughness, and surface contamination levels were variables in the experiments. Cross-section TEM specimens were made from these samples. TEM analysis was conducted on the wire, wire/substrate interface and substrate. Pull tests showed that for the Al substrates the surface roughness or the presence of contamination did not effect the bond strength, whereas for contaminated stainless steel substrates, a three μm surface finish resulted in the highest bond pull strength. The TEM observations revealed features such as low-angle grain boundaries, dislocation loops and the absence of a high dislocation density, indicating that the wire and substrate were dynamically annealed during bonding. Based on the width of a zone near a grain boundary in the wire which was depleted of dislocation loops, it was estimated that local heating equivalent to a temperature of 250° C for 90 msec was achieved in the wire during bonding. No evidence was found for melting along the bond interface, indicating that UWB is a solid-state process. Based on the TEM observationsof the bond interface and the pull tests, it is concluded that the ultrasonic vibrations clean the surfaces to be joined to the extent that a good bond can be obtained by intimate metal-metal contact in the clean areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. C. Joshi,Welding Journal 50, 840 (1971).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. G. G. Harman and K. O. Leedy,10th Annu. Proc. of Reliability Phys. Symp., pp. 49–56 (1972).

  3. G. G. Harman and J. Albers, IEEE Trans. on Parts, Hybrids and PackagingPHP-13, 406 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. V. H. Winchell, 14thAnnu. Proc. Reliability Phys. Symp., pp. 98–107 (1976).

  5. V. H. Winchell and H. M. Berg, IEEE Trans. on Components, Hybrids, and Manufact. Techn.CHMT-1, 211 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Kreye, Welding Journal 154s (1975).

  7. J. E. Krzanowski, Proc. 39th Electron. Comp. Conf., Houston, TX, p. 451–456 (1989); also to be published in the March issue of the IEEE Trans, on CHMT.

  8. B. Langenecker, IEEE Trans. Sonics and UltrasonicsSU-13, 1 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. A. Brandes, Smithells Metals Reference Book—6th Ed., London: Butterworths & Co. LTD (1983) p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. P. Severdenko, V. V. Klubovich and A. V. Stepanenko, in Ultrasonic Rolling and Wire Drawing of Metals, Consultants Bureau, New York (1972) pp. 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krzanowski, J.E., Murdeshwar, N. Deformation and bonding processes in aluminum ultrasonic wire wedge bonding. J. Electron. Mater. 19, 919–928 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652917

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652917

Key words

Navigation