Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Science Education Research and Practices in Taiwan pp 133–146Cite as

Learners’ Epistemic Beliefs and Their Relations with Science Learning—Exploring the Cultural Differences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter discusses the cultural differences in learners’ epistemic beliefs (EBs) and the relations with science learning by cross comparing empirical studies from different countries in the recent 10 years. The reviewed papers were collected from the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) database on the research platform, Web of Knowledge, from 2004 to 2013. A total of 106 papers were included in the review. Comparisons of the research purposes, questions, and findings were made across different countries to reveal possible cultural differences. The analysis shows that among the eight issues abstracted from the 106 papers, the four which received the most attention were the status of students’ EBs (or conceptions of learning, COL), the role or effects of EBs (or COL) in science learning, the effects of instructional intervention on changes in EBs, and the relations between EBs and study approaches. Since most studies were conducted in Taiwan, Turkey, and the USA, the cultural comparisons were made mainly across these three countries. It was found that learners from Taiwan and the USA, which were identified as having lower context cultures, seemed to have developed more sophisticated beliefs about knowledge, but they tended to believe more in the innate ability of learning. On the contrary, learners from Turkey as well as China, which were recognized as having high-context cultures, tended to believe more in authority knowledge while relying more on the value of effort. While not much difference in the relations between learners’ EBs and science learning could be found across Taiwan, Turkey, and the USA, it was much easier for the EBs of learners with low-context cultures to be affected by instructional interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2012). Exploring student beliefs and understanding in elementary science and mathematics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 942–960 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. D., & Park, S. (2011). Epistemological syncretism in biology classroom: A case study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(1), 74–86 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cam, A., & Geban, O. (2011). Effectiveness of case-based learning instruction on epistemological beliefs and attitudes toward chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(1), 26–32 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai, C. S., Deng, F., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). A comparison of scientific epistemological views between mainland China and Taiwan high school students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(1), 17–26 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S. (1999). The Chinese learner—a question of style. Education + Training, 41, 294–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. A. (2012). Implicit theories, epistemic beliefs, and science motivation: A person-centered approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 724–735 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cifuentes, L., & Shih, Y.C. D. (2001). Teaching And Learning Online: A Collaboration Between U.S. and Taiwanese Students. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 456–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coban, G. U. (2013). The effects of inquiry supported by argument maps on science process skills and epistemological views of prospective science teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(3), 271–288 (papers selected for review).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobern, W.W., & Aikenhead, G.S. (1998). Cultural aspects of learning science. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 39–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Colbeck, D. (2007). Understanding knowledge genesis by means of multivariate factor analysis of epistemological belief structures. Information Research—An International Electronic Journal, 12(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Enz, C. A. (1986). Power and shared values in the corporate culture. Ann Arbor: UMI Resdearch Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Er, K. O. (2013). A study of the epistemological beliefs of teacher candidates in terms of various variables. Egitim Arastrmalari- Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 50, 207–226 (papers selected for review).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1986). Culture difference and science education. The Urban Review, 18, 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertekin, E., Dilmac, B., Delice, A., & Aydin, E. (2009). Teacher Trainees’ epistemological beliefs: Effects of gender, institution, and discipline (mathematics/social sciences). New Educational Review, 18(2), 184–196 (papers selected for review).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M. G., Ashton, P. T., & Algina, J. (2004). Changing preservice teachers’ epistemological beliefs about teaching and learning in mathematic: An intervention study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 164–185 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottesman, A. J., & Hoskins S. G. (2013). CREATE Cornerstone: Introduction to scientific thinking, a new course for STEM-interested freshmen, demystifies scientific thinking through analysis of scientific literature. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12(1), 59–71 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., & Elby, A. (2011). Beyond epistemological deficits: Dynamic explanations of engineering students’ difficulties with mathematical sense-making. International Journal of Science Education, 33(18), 2463–2488 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Oxford: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, L., & Brandt, C. (2004). Science and cultural process: Defining an anthropological approach to science education. Studies in Science Education, 40, 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannon, J. & D’Netto B. (2007). Cultural diversity online: Student engagement with learning technologies. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(5), 418–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P.R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs bout knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). (Eds.) Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, J.J. & York, D.E. (1995). Learning styles and culturally diverse students: A literature review. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 484–497). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabapinar, Y. (2012). An analysis of Turkish prospective teachers’ perception of constructivist view of learning and teaching. Egitim Ve Bilim- Education and Science, 37(165), 320–335 (papers selected for review).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, N. H. (2008). Learning to teach science: Personal epistemologies, teaching goals, and practices of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 478–498 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kizilgunes, B., Tekkaya, C., & Sungar, S. (2009). Modeling the relations among students’ epistemological beliefs, motivation, learning approach, and achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 243–255 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knobloch, N. A. (2008). Factors of teacher beliefs related to integrating agriculture into elementary school classrooms. Agriculture and Human Values, 25(4), 529–539 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korac-Kakabadse, N., Kouzmin, A., Korac-Kakabadse, A., & Savery, L. (2001) Low- and high-context communication patterns: Towards mapping cross-cultural encounters. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 8(2), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. W. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). Students’ domain-specific epistemological beliefs: A comparison between biology and physics. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21, 215–229 (papers selected for review).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. H., Johanson, R. E., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Exploring Taiwanese high school students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning science through a structural equation modeling analysis. Science Education, 92(2), 191–220 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. H., Tsai, C. C., & Chai, C. S. (2012). A comparative study of Taiwan, Singapore, and China pre service teachers’ epistemic beliefs. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21, 599–609 (papers selected for review).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Exploring the structure relationships between high school students’ scientific epistemological views and their utilization of information commitments toward online science information. International Journal of Science Education, 30(15), 2001–2022 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, T. J., Deng, F., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). High school students’ scientific epistemological beliefs motivation in learning science, and their relationship: A comparative study within the Chinese culture. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(1), 37–47 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, B. A., Hsu, L., Sadaghiani, H., Talor, J. W., & Cummings, K. (2012). Positive attitudinal shifts with the physics by inquiry curriculum across multiple implementations. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 8(1), Document Number: 010102 (papers selected for review).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lising, L., & Elby, A. (2005). The impact of epistemology on learning: A case study from introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 73(4), 372–382 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, P. H., & Liu, S. Y. (2011). A cross-subject investing of college students’epistemological beliefs of physics and mathematics. Asia-Pacific Education Research, 20, 336–351 (papers selected for review).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A., & Gould, E. W. (2000). Crosscurrents: Cultural dimensions and global Web user-interface design. Interactions, 7(4), 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, K. (2003). Does one size fit all? Exploring asynchronous learning in a multicultural environment. JALN, 7(1), 37–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieminen, J., Lindblom-Ylanne, S., & Lonka, K. (2004). The development of study orientations and study success in students of pharmacy. Instructional Science, 32(5): 387–417 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, G., & Poliquin, A. (2008). Role of epistemic beliefs and scientific argumentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 30(15), 1977–1999 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2007). PISA 2006: Science Competences for Tomorrow’s world, Volume1: Analysis. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogan-Bekiroglu, F. & Sengul-Turgut, G. (2011). Students’ general and physics epistemological beliefs: a twofold phenomenon. Research in Science & Technological Education, 29(3), 291–314 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogbu, J. U. (1992). Understanding cultural diversity and learning. Educational Researcher, 21, 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. G. (1998). Forms of ethical and intellectual development in the college years: A scheme. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in Education: Theory, Reserach and Applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravindran, B., Greene, B. A., & Debacker, T. K. (2005). Predicting preservice teachers’ cognitive engagement with goals and epistemological beliefs. Journal of Educational Research, 98(4), 222–232 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reznitskaya, A., & Gregory, M. (2013). Student thought and classroom language: Examining the mechanisms of change in Dialogic Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 48(2), 114–133 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricco, R., Pierce, S. S., & Medinilla, C. (2010). Epistemic beliefs and achievement motivation in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(2), 305–340 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivero, A., Azcrate, P., Porlan, R., del Pozo, R. M., & Harres, J. (2011). The progression of prospective primary teachers’ conception of the methodology of teaching, Research in Science Education, 41(5), 739–769 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandi-Urena, S., Cooper, M. M., & Catlin, T. A. (2011). Graduate teaching assistants’ epistemological and metacognitive development. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(1), 92–100 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, W. A. (2009). In defense of clarity in the study of personal epistemology. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 150–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1990). The effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge in comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • She, H. C. (2004). Fostering radical conceptual change through dual situated learning model. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(2), 142–164 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. U. (2010). Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: I. Philosophical/epistemological issues. Science & Education, 19(6), 523–533 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008) Culturally speaking. Culture, communication and politeness theory. (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, M. (2005). Social metaphorical mapping of the concept of force “CHI-KA-RA” in Japanese. International Journal of Science Education, 27(15), 1773–1804 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. A. (2008). Reviving Perry—an analysis of epistemological change by gender and ethnicity among gifted high school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(1), 87–88 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. C. (2004). Conception of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: A phenomenographic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1733–1750 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. C. (2006). Biological knowledge is more tentative than physics knowledge: Taiwan high school adolescents’ views about the nature of biology and physics. Adolescence, 41, 691–703 (papers selected for review).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. C. (2007). Teachers’ scientific epistemological views: the coherence with instruction and students’ views. Science Education, 91(2), 222–243 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. C. (2008). The preferences toward constructivist Internet-based learning environments among university students in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 16–31 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C. M., Wartenbert, T. E., & Winner, E. (2013). Engagement in philosophical dialogue facilitates children’s’ reasoning about subjectivity. Developmental Psychology, 47(7), 1338–1347 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, J., & Elby, A. (2013). Context dependence of students’ views about the role of equations in understanding biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12(2), 274–286 (papers selected for review).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watters, D. J., & Watters, J. J. (2007). Approaches to learning by students in the biological sciences: Implication for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 29(1), 19–43 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D. L., & Montgomery, D. (2009). Community college students’ view on learning mathematics in terms of their epistemological beliefs: a Q method study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(3), 289–306 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. K. (2011). Exploring the development of fifth graders’ practical epistemologies and explanation skills in inquiry-based learning classroom. Research in Science Education, 41(3), 319–340 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Würtz, E. (2006). Intercultural communication on Web sites: A cross-cultural analysis of web sites from high-context cultures and low-context cultures. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1), 274–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, F. Y. (2005). Student views concerning evidence and the expert in reasoning a socio-scientific issue and personal epistemology. Educational Studies, 31(1), 65–84 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, F. Y. & Tsai, C. C. (2012). Personal Epistemology and Science Learning: A Review of Empirical Studies. In Fraser, B. J., Kenneth, T., & Campbell, M. (Eds.) Second international handbook of science education (pp. 259–280). NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, F. Y., Chang, C. Y., & Hsu, Y. S. (2008). Teacher views about the constructivist instruction and personal epistemology—A national study in Taiwan. Educational Studies, 34, 527–542 (papers selected for review).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Fang-Ying Yang

Authors
  1. Fang-Ying Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fang-Ying Yang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Institute of Science Education, Taipei, Taiwan

    Mei-Hung Chiu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yang, FY. (2016). Learners’ Epistemic Beliefs and Their Relations with Science Learning—Exploring the Cultural Differences. In: Chiu, MH. (eds) Science Education Research and Practices in Taiwan. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-472-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-472-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-471-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-472-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation