Skip to main content

A Review on Reed Bed System as a Potential Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Plant Transgenics: Methods and Applications

Abstract

To develop sustainable societies, wastewater treatment and management are two most significant challenges the world is facing today. A large amount of potable water is being wasted regularly from various sources, including household, in the form of wastewater. Reed bed systems (RBSs) are cost-effective engineered constructed wetlands (CWs) which can be used as an eco-friendly technology for treatment of different wastewaters. Several factors are crucial for effective performance of this sustainable technology, which include design parameters of RBSs, media materials, hydraulic regime, inhabiting microorganisms, biofilms and functionalized plants. The biotic community (especially, microbial assemblages) dwelling RBSs can vary considerably in different environment and wastewater compositions. Thus, RBSs can be an excellent option for decentralized wastewater treatment with water reuse potentiality in the space constrained areas. This review presents recent developments of RBSs and its potential for using as decentralized cost-effective wastewater treatment processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen LH Jr (1997) Mechanisms and rates of O2 transfer to and through submerged rhizomes and roots via aerenchyma. Annu Proc Soil Crop Sci Soc Fla 56:41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Arends JBA, Van Denhouwe S, Verstraete W, Boon N, Rabaey K (2014) Enhanced disinfection of wastewater by combining wetland treatment with bioelectrochemical H2O2 production. Bioresour Technol 155:352–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Austin D, Nivala J (2009) Energy requirements for nitrification and biological nitrogen removal in engineered wetlands. Ecol Eng 35:184–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ávila C, Matamoros V, Reyes-Contreras C, Piña B, Casado M, Mita L, Rivetti C, Barata C, García J, Bayona JM (2014) Attenuation of emerging organic contaminants in a hybrid constructed wetland system under different hydraulic loading rates and their associated toxicological effects in wastewater. Sci Total Environ 470–471:1272–1280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brix H, Schierup H (1989) Use of aquatic macrophyte in water pollution control. Ambio 18:100–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Brix H, Arias CA, del Bubba M (2001) Media selection for sustainable phosphorus removal in subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Water Sci Technol 44:47–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho PN, Arias CA, Brix H (2017) Constructed wetlands for water treatment: new developments. Water 9:397. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9060397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Wei XD, Liu YS, Ying GG, Liu SS, He LY, Su HC, Hu LX, Chen FR, Yang YQ (2016) Removal of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes from domestic sewage by constructed wetlands: optimization of wetland substrates and hydraulic loading. Sci Total Environ 565:240–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ciria MP, Solano ML, Soriano P (2005) Role of macrophyte Typha latifolia in a constructed wetland for wastewater treatment and assessment of its potential as a biomass fuel. Biosyst Eng 92:535–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong X, Reddy GB (2010) Soil bacterial communities in constructed wetlands treated with swine wastewater using PCR-DGGE technique. Bioresour Technol 101:1175–1182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drewe JA, Mwangi D, Donoghue HD, Cromie RL (2009) PCR analysis of the presence and location of Mycobacterium avium in a constructed reed bed, with implications for avian tuberculosis control. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 67:320–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elsayed OF, Maillard E, Vuilleumier S, Imfeld G (2014) Bacterial communities in batch and continuous-flow wetlands treating the herbicide S-metolachlor. Sci Total Environ 499:327–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, Wang W, Zhang B, Guo Y, Ngo HH, Guo W, Zhang J, Wu H (2013) Nitrogen removal in intermittently aerated vertical flow constructed wetlands: impact of influent COD/N ratios. Bioresour Technol 143:461–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faulwetter JL, Gagnon V, Sundberg C, Chazarenc F, Burr MD, Brisson J, Camper AK, Stein OR (2009) Microbial processes influencing performance of treatment wetlands: a review. Ecol Eng 35:987–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera I, Sánchez O (2016) Insights into microbial diversity in wastewater treatment systems: how far have we come? Biotechnol Adv 34:790–802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gontia-Mishra I, Sasidharan S, Tiwari S (2014) Recent developments in use of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase for conferring tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress. Biotechnol Lett 36:889–898

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • He T, Guan W, Luan Z, Xie S (2016) Spatiotemporal variation of bacterial and archaeal communities in a pilot-scale constructed wetland for surface water treatment. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:1479–1488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heers M (2006) Constructed wetlands under different geographic conditions: evaluation of the suitability and criteria for the choice of plants including productive species. PhD dissertation, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences

    Google Scholar 

  • Horváth G (2012) Review of subsurface flow treatment wetland feasibility in Finland. PhD dissertation, Tampere University of Applied Science

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y, Zhao Y, Rymszewicz A (2014) Robust biological nitrogen removal by creating multiple tides in a single bed tidal flow constructed wetland. Sci Total Environ 470–471:1197–1204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson EF, Jackson CR (2008) Viruses in wetland ecosystems. Freshw Biol 53:1214–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamshidi S, Akbarzadeh A, Woo KS, Valipour A (2014) Wastewater treatment using integrated anaerobic baffled reactor and bio-rack wetland planted with Phragmites sp. and Typha sp. Environ Health Sci Eng 12:131–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec RH (2009) Wastewater treatment at the Houghton Lake wetland: soils and sediments. Ecol Eng 35:1333–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec RH, Knight RL (1996) Treatment wetlands. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec RH, Wallace S (2009) Treatment wetlands. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpiscak MM, Sanchez LR, Freitas RJ, Gerba CP (2001) Removal of bacterial indicators and pathogens from dairy wastewater by a multi-component treatment system. Water Sci Technol 44:183–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsley C, Kennedy K, Crolla A (2017) A combined reed bed/freezing bed technology for septage treatment and reuse in cold climate regions. Water Sci Technol 76(2):286 293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kurniadie D (2011) Wastewater treatment using vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland in Indonesia. Am J Environ Sci 7:15–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen JD (2017) Environmental assessment of sewage sludge management – focusing on sludge treatment reed bed systems. Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Kgs. Lyngby. (Downloaded from: https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/136886674/Thesis_online_version_Julie_Dam_Larsen.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Ye ZH, Wei ZJ, Wong MH (2011a) Root porosity and radial oxygen loss related to arsenic tolerance and uptake in wetland plants. Environ Pollut 159:30–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Zhang Y, Zhang X (2011b) Heat preservation of subsurface flow constructed wetland in cold area in winter and its operation effect. Procedia Environ Sci 10:2182–2188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Wu B, Zhu G, Liu Y, Ng WJ, Appan A, Tan SK (2016) Highthroughput pyrosequencing analysis of bacteria relevant to cometabolic and metabolic degradation of ibuprofen in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Sci Total Environ 562:604–613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lv T, Zhang Y, Carvalho PN, Zhang L, Button M, Arias CA, Weber KP, Brix H (2017) Microbial community metabolic function in constructed wetland mesocosms treating the pesticides imazalil and tebuconazole. Ecol Eng 98:378–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masciandaro G, Iannelli R, Chiarugi M, Peruzzi E (2015) Reed bed systems for sludge treatment: case studies in Italy. 5 Water Sci Technol 72(7):1043–1050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mæhlum T (1999) Wetlands for treatment of landfill leachates in cold climates. In: Mulamoottil G, McBean EA, Rovers F (eds) Constructed wetlands for the treatment of landfill leachates. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 33–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander U, Teiter S, Kuusemets V, Lohmus K, Oovel M, Nurk K, Augustin J (2003) Nitrogen and phosphorous budgets in a subsurface flow wastewater treatment wetland. Water Resour Manag II 61:135–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Viveros O, Jorquera MA, Crowley DE, Gajardo G, Mora ML (2010) Mechanisms and practical considerations involved in plant growth promotion by rhizobacteria. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 10:293–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen PH, Mielczarek AT, Kragelund C, Nielse JL, Saunders AM, Kong Y, Hansen AA, Vollertsen J (2012) A conceptual model system of microbial communities in enhanced biological phosphorus removal plants. Water Res 44:5070–5088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peng JF, Wang BZ, Wang L (2005) Multi-stage ponds–wetlands ecosystem for effective wastewater treatment. J Zhejiang Univ (Sci) B6:346–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo A, Bresciani R, Martinuzzi N, Masi F (2018) French reed bed as a solution to minimize the operational and maintenance costs of wastewater treatment from a small settlement: an Italian example. Water 10:156. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez CA, Childers DL, Turnbull L, Upham RF, Weller N (2016) Aridland constructed treatment wetlands II: plant mediation of surface hydrology enhances nitrogen removal. Ecol Eng 97:658–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez O (2017) Constructed wetlands revisited: microbial diversity in the –omics era. Microb Ecol 73:722–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shen H, Hu HY, Pan YB (2007) Study on enhanced measures for operation of subsurface flow constructed wetlands in winter. China Water Wastewater 23:44–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein OR, Hook PB (2005) Temperature, plants, and oxygen: how does season affect constructed wetland performance? Environ Sci Health 40:1331–1342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stott R, Jenkins T, Bahgat M, Shalaby I (1999) Capacity of constructed wetlands to remove parasite eggs from wastewaters in Egypt. Water Sci Technol 40:117–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taleno VC (2012) Comparison of two constructed wetland with different soil depth in relation to their nitrogen removal. PhD dissertation, Universidad Autónoma De San Luis Potosí

    Google Scholar 

  • Tee HC, Lim PE, Seng CE, MAM N (2012) Newly developed baffled subsurface-flow constructed wetland for the enhancement of nitrogen removal. Bioresour Technol 104:235–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari K, Jha S, Vyas K, Patel K, Patel M (2017) Reed bed technology: a review. Intl J Engg Scien Invention Res Dev III:554–556. e-ISSN: 2349-6185

    Google Scholar 

  • Valipour A, Ahn YH (2016) Constructed wetlands as sustainable ecotechnologies in decentralization practices: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:180–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Valipour A, Hamnabard N, Woo KS, Ahn YH (2014a) Performance of high-rate constructed phytoremediation process with attached growth for domestic wastewater treatment: effect of high TDS and Cu. Environ Manag 145:1–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Valipour A, Azizi S, Raman VK, Jamshidi S, Hamnabard N (2014b) The comparative evaluation of the performance of two phytoremediation systems for domestic wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Eng 56:319–326

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Valipour A, Raman VK, Ahn YH (2015) Effectiveness of domestic wastewater treatment using a bio-hedge water hyacinth wetland system. Water 7:329–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vohla C, Koiv M, Bavor HJ, Chazarenc F, Mander U (2011) Filter materials for phosphorus removal from wastewater in treatment wetlands – a review. Ecol Eng 37:70–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal J (2004) Removal of phosphorus in constructed wetlands with horizontal subsurface flow in the Czech Republic. Water Air Soil Pollut 4:657–670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal J (2013) Emergent plants in free water surface constructed wetlands: a review. Ecol Eng 61P:582–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal J, Brezinova T (2015) The use of constructed wetlands for removal of pesticides from agricultural runoff and drainage: a review. Environ Int 75C:11–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace SD, Nivala JA (2005) Thermal response of a horizontal subsurface flow wetland in a cold temperate climate. IWA specialist group on the use of macrophytes in water pollution control. Newsletter 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiessner A, Kuschk P, Kappelmeyer U, Bederski O, Müller RA, Kästner M (2006) Influence of helophytes on redox reactions in their rhizosphere. In: Mackova M, Dowling DN, Macek T (eds) Phytoremediation and rhizoremediation, vol 9A. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 69–82

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wong C, Au E, Truong H, Quan J, Young J, Kathriarachchi S (2009) The reed bed sewage treatment system. http://empslocal.ex.ac.uk

  • Wu S, Austin D, Liu L, Dong R (2011) Performance of integrated household constructed wetland for domestic wastewater treatment in rural areas. Ecol Eng 37:948–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin H, Shen W (1995) Using reed beds for winter operation of wetland treatment system for wastewater. Water Sci Technol 32:111–117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao YJ, Hui Z, Chao X, Nie E, Li HJ, He J, Zheng Z (2011) Efficiency of two-stage combinations of subsurface vertical down-flow and up-flow constructed wetland systems for treating variation in influent C/N ratios of domestic wastewater. Ecol Eng 37:1546–1554

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

S.C. is thankful to Director, DRL (DRDO), Assam, India. The authors apologize for the many colleagues who are not referenced in this work due to space limitations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chatterjee, S., Mitra, A., Gupta, S.K., Gupta, D.K. (2019). A Review on Reed Bed System as a Potential Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Practice. In: Sathishkumar, R., Kumar, S., Hema, J., Baskar, V. (eds) Advances in Plant Transgenics: Methods and Applications. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9624-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics