Skip to main content

Economical Evaluation of the Flexible Resources for Providing the Operational Flexibility in the Power System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integration of Air Conditioning and Heating into Modern Power Systems
  • 557 Accesses

Abstract

The inherent stochastic nature of wind power requires additional flexibility during power system operation. Traditionally, conventional generation is the only option to provide the required flexibility. However, the provision of the flexibility from the conventional generation such as coal-fired generating units comes at the cost of significantly additional fuel consumption and carbon emissions. Fortunately, with the development of the technologies, energy storage and customer demand response would be able to compete with the conventional generation in providing the flexibility. Give that power systems should deploy the most economic resources for provision of the required operational flexibility, this chapter presents a detailed analysis of the economic characteristics of these key flexibility options. The concept of balancing cost is proposed to represent the cost of utilizing the flexible resources to integrate the variable wind power. The key indicators are proposed respectively for the different flexible resources to measure the balancing cost. Moreover, the optimization models are developed to evaluate the indicators to find out the balancing costs when utilizing different flexible resources. The results illustrate that exploiting the potential of flexibility from demand side management is the preferred option for integrating variable wind power when the penetration level is below 10%, preventing additional fuel consumption and carbon emissions. However, it may require 8% of the customer demand to be flexible and available. Moreover, although energy storage is currently relatively expensive, it is likely to prevail over conventional generation by 2025 to 2030, when the capital cost of energy storage is projected to drop to approximately $400/kWh or lower.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. C. Feng, M. Cui, B.M. Hodge, J. Zhang, A data-driven multi-model methodology with deep feature selection for short-term wind forecasting. Appl. Energy 190, 1245–1257 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H.Z. Wang, G.Q. Li, G.B. Wang, J.C. Peng, H. Jiang, Y.T. Liu, Deep learning based ensemble approach for probabilistic wind power forecasting. Appl. Energy 188, 56–70 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Ju, Z. Tan, J. Yuan et al., A bi-level stochastic scheduling optimization model for a virtual power plant connected to a wind–photovoltaic–energy storage system considering the uncertainty and demand response. Appl. Energy 171, 184–199 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M.H. Amrollahi, S.M.T. Bathaee, Techno-economic optimization of hybrid photovoltaic/wind generation together with energy storage system in a stand-alone micro-grid subjected to demand response. Appl. Energy 202, 66–77 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Jiang, J. Xu, Y. Sun, C. Wei, J. Wang, D. Ke et al., Day-ahead stochastic economic dispatch of wind integrated power system considering demand response of residential hybrid energy system. Appl. Energy 190, 1126–1137 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Ren, J. Liu, J. Wan, Y. Guo, D. Yu, J. Yan, Overview of wind power intermittency: impacts, measurements, and mitigation solutions. Appl. Energy 204, 47–65 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Kubik, P. Coker, C. Hunt, The role of conventional generation in managing variability. Energy Policy 50, 253–261 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Hirth, F. Ueckerdt, O. Edenhofer, Integration costs revisited–An economic framework for wind and solar variability. Renew. Energy 74, 925–939 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P. Simshauser, The hidden costs of wind generation in a thermal power system: what cost? Aust. Econ. Rev. 44, 269–292 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Bludszuweit, J.A. Dominguez-Navarro, A probabilistic method for energy storage sizing based on wind power forecast uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 26, 1651–1658 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Holttinen, P. Meibom, A. Orths et al., Impacts of large amounts of wind power on design and operation of power systems, results of IEA collaboration. Wind Energy 14(2), 179–192 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Khalid, R.P. Aguilera, A.V. Savkin, V.G. Agelidis, On maximizing profit of wind-battery supported power station based on wind power and energy price forecasting. Appl. Energy 211, 764–773 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C.D. Jonghe, B.F. Hobbs, R. Belmans, Optimal generation mix with short-term demand response and wind penetration. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 27, 830–839 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. T. Broeer, J. Fuller, F. Tuffner, D. Chassin, N. Djilali, Modeling framework and validation of a smart grid and demand response system for wind power integration. Appl. Energy 113, 199–207 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Falsafi, A. Zakariazadeh, S. Jadid, The role of demand response in single and multi-objective wind-thermal generation scheduling: a stochastic programming. Energy 64, 853–867 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G.P. Swin, M. Godel, Estimating the impact of wind generation on balancing costs in the GB electricity markets, in European Energy Market (2012), pp. 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Yang, R. Bewley, Integration of variable generation, cost-causation, and integration costs. Electr. J. 24, 51–63 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Yan, F. Li, Y. Liu, C. Gu, Novel cost model for balancing wind power forecasting uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 32, 318–329 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Joos, I. Staffell, Short-term integration costs of variable renewable energy: wind curtailment and balancing in Britain and Germany. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 86, 45–65 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. N. Mahmoudi, T.K. Saha, M. Eghbal, Demand response application by strategic wind power producers. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 31, 1227–1237 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Y. Ding, C. Shao, J. Yan, Y. Song, C. Zhang, C. Guo, Economical flexibility options for integrating fluctuating wind energy in power systems: The case of China. Appl. Energy 228, 426–436 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Ma, V. Silva, R. Belhomme, D.S. Kirschen, Evaluating and planning flexibility in sustainable power systems. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 4, 1–11 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M.S. Lu, C.L. Chang, W.J. Lee, L. Wang, Combining the wind power generation system with energy storage equipment. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 45, 2109–2115 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. P. Giorsetto, K.F. Utsurogi, Development of a new procedure for reliability modeling of wind turbine generators. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. PAS-102, 134–143 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. L. Cheng, M. Liu, Y. Sun, Y. Ding, A multi-state model for wind farms considering operational outage probability. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 1, 177–185 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. R. Karki, P. Hu, R. Billinton, A simplified wind power generation model for reliability evaluation. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 21, 533–540 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. H.-I. Su, A. El Gamal, Modeling and analysis of the role of energy storage for renewable integration: power balancing. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28, 4109–4117 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. N. Zhang, C. Kang, D.S. Kirschen, Q. Xia, W. Xi, J. Huang et al., Planning pumped storage capacity for wind power integration. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 4, 393–401 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. K. Wang, K. Jiang, B. Chung, T. Ouchi, P.J. Burke, D.A. Boysen et al., Lithium-antimony-lead liquid metal battery for grid-level energy storage. Nature 514, 348–350 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. C. Zhao, Q. Wang, J. Wang, Y. Guan, Expected value and chance constrained stochastic unit commitment ensuring wind power utilization. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 29, 2696–2705 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. T.K.A. Brekken, A. Yokochi, A.V. Jouanne, Z.Z. Yen, H.M. Hapke, D.A. Halamay, Optimal energy storage sizing and control for wind power applications. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2, 69–77 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. D. Elliott, Renewable energy and sustainable futures. Futures 32, 261–274 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. F. Liu, X. Jiang, Z. Li, Investigation on affects of generator load on coal consumption rate in fossil power plant. Power Syst. Eng. (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  34. C. Zhou, K. Qian, M. Allan, W. Zhou, Modeling of the cost of EV battery wear due to V2G application in power systems. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 26, 1041–1050 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. S. Han, H. Aki, S. Han, A practical battery wear model for electric vehicle charging applications, in Power and Energy Society General Meeting (2013), pp. 1100–1108

    Google Scholar 

  36. Y. Choi, H. Kim, E. Sciubba, Optimal scheduling of energy storage system for self-sustainable base station operation considering battery wear-out cost. Energies 9, 462 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. H. Zhong, L. Xie, Q. Xia, Coupon incentive-based demand response: theory and case study. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28, 1266–1276 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. C. Cecati, F. Ciancetta, P. Siano, A multilevel inverter for photovoltaic systems with fuzzy logic control. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 57, 4115–4125 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. R. Doherty, M.O. Malley, A new approach to quantify reserve demand in systems with significant installed wind capacity. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 20, 587–595 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. The Report on National Electricity Reliability Index in 2015 (China Electricity Councile)

    Google Scholar 

  41. M. Klobasa, Analysis of demand response and wind integration in Germany’s electricity market. IET Renew. Power Gener. 4, 55–63 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Y. Ding, S. Pineda, P. Nyeng, J. Østergaard, E.M. Larsen, Q. Wu, Real-time market concept architecture for EcoGrid EU—A prototype for european smart grids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 4, 2006–2016 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Ding .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ding, Y., Song, Y., Hui, H., Shao, C. (2019). Economical Evaluation of the Flexible Resources for Providing the Operational Flexibility in the Power System. In: Integration of Air Conditioning and Heating into Modern Power Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6420-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6420-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6419-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6420-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics