Abstract
The current and previous studies elucidate that commercially available surfactants that mimic the natural constitutes of invertebrates gut fluids provide the efficient method for remediation of metals and organic pollutants from contaminated solids and waters. But, there are some disadvantages to the application of surfactants for remediation such as the formation of high-viscosity emulsions, toxic and very expensive. Surfactants found in the gut fluids of deposit feeders may play the different roles in their digestive system, for example, the dissolution of food particles. Mainly, there are two approaches either the metals are assimilated or not assimilated by organisms. If the metals are assimilated in the organisms, they may be become insoluble or accumulated in a specific organ or tissue and cause harmful effects. On the other hand, if not then metals pass through the complex gut fluids composition and enter into the aquatic environment where it may possible that it becomes more toxic to the environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bat L (1998) Influence of sediment on heavy metal uptake by the polychaete Arenicola marina. Tarkish J Zool 22:341–350
Chen Z, Mayer LM (1999) Assessment of sedimentary Cu availability: a comparison of biomimetic and AVS approaches. Environ Sci Technol 33:650–652
Cuypers C, Pancras T, Grotenhuis T, Rulkens W (2002) The estimation of PAH bioavailability in contaminated sediments using hydroxypropyl-b-cyclodextrin and Triton X-100 extraction techniques. Chemosphere 46:1235–1245
Doong RA, Wu YW, Lei WG (1998) Surfactant enhanced remediation of cadmium contaminated soils. Water Sci Technol 37:65–71
Hughes TJ, Turner A (2005) Sorption of ionic surfactants to estuarine sediment and their influence on the sequestration of phenanthrene. Environ Sci Technol 39:1688–1697
Lawrence AL, Mcaloon KM, Mason RP, Mayer LM (1999) Intestinal solubilization of particle-associated organic and inorganic mercury as a measure of bioavailability to benthic invertebrates. Environ Sci Technol 33:1871–1876
Mulligan CN, Eftekhari F (2003) Remediation with surfactant foam of PCP contaminated soil. Eng Geol 70:269–279
Nivas BT, Sabatinp BJ, Harwell JH (1996) Surfactant enhanced remediation of subsurface chromium contamination. Water Res 30(3):511–520
Shin M, Barrington SF, Marshall WD, Kim JW (2005) Effect of surfactant alkyl chain length on soil cadmium desorption using surfactant/ligand systems. Chemosphere 58:735–742
Wang S, Mulligan CN (2004) An evaluation of surfactant foam technology in remediation of contaminated soil. Chemsphere 57:1079–1089
Xu Jing, Turner A (2008) Influence of ionic surfactants on the flocculation and sorption of palladium and mercury in the aquatic environment. Water Res 42:318–326
Zenga Q-R, Tanga H-X, Liao B-H, Tang C (2006) Solubilization and desorption of methyl-parathion from porous media: a comparison of hydroxypropyl-b-cyclodextrin and two nonionic surfactants. Water Res 40:1351–1358
Zhou W, Zhu WL (2004) Solubilization of pyrene by anionic-nonionic mixed surfactants. J Hazard Mater 109(1–3):213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.03.018
Zhou W, Zhu WL (2005) Solubilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by anionic–nonionic mixed surfactant. Colloids Surf A 255:145–152
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bisht, A.S. (2019). Implication of Surfactants in Remediation. In: Commercial Surfactants for Remediation. Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0221-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0221-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0220-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0221-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)